Xyston wrote:
Colby was only not in control because he gave up the control that he had. He still had ultimate control though and had he made smarter choices then the game would've been completely changed. That's why Tina rode coattails. She trusted Colby to screw up his game for her and he did. She's no different than Katie except that her jury let her win, while Katie's didn't. In fact Katie probably had even more control.
No he did not. Colby ultimately gave up his chance at winning because he felt an obligation to take Tina to the finals. This obligation can be seen, and this view has been widely verified, as an emotional manipulation of Colby. For example, Keith said that he would have also taken Tina to the finals for the exact same reasons. She did not trust Colby to screw up his game, which if true is even more of a reason of his ultimate undeservingness, she made a bond with Colby on Day 1.
Comparing her to Katie is fallacious, as Katie never had the mental clout to convince either Tom, Ian, or the jury to play in her favor.
Of course he wanted to break down her 3 person alliance with Mitchell and
Amber. Plus Keith was better in challenges and Mitchell was like dying. She was just in the right place at the right time.
