Yuku free message boards

RobRob wrote:

---

Zuks wrote:

---

RobRob wrote:

---

Zuks wrote:

---

0 = 4 x 6
1 = 2 x 5
2 = 8 x 6
3 = 9 x 7
4 = 3 x 3
5 = 1 x 2
6 = 4 x 4
7 = 6 x 1
8 = 7 x 9
9 = 5 x 8

How about these types?

Hmmm... Well it's cool you think I got you right. :D
Dude, are you just throwing around numbers to mess with me...? Oh well, I'll give it a go... my defense:
0 was hard to judge since we didn't get to see her for very long. But her bonding with 9 and her "it was physical!" seemed 4y.
1 would be an unusually attached 5. As a 5, I don't see that level of sentimentality happening. Usually strong attachments for 5 happen with peers and people who share interests, and usually when they are not around those people they don't have much of a reason to explicitly state how much they care for someone who's absent. If I had a kid, I'd probably keep it (missing them) to myself, or try and separate myself from sentimentality.
2 seemed more like an 8 than a 6 to me because although he expressed skepticism to certain things, his level of confidence, pride in his successes and defensiveness of those he cared for were very 8y to me.
3 might have become more of a 7 as time went on, but her shyness and honest phobias were more 9y.
5 seemed more adamant in following 5's book of rules than Val's book of rules, which was very 1y to me. 2 seems out of nowhere...?
7 could be a 1 but his level of "No ways" and facial expressions that read "I cannot believe this is happening to me" were so 6y.
8 could be a 9, but I think she's more aggressive than that, too. She's a real fighter!
9 seemed more into his own agenda than leading any group (8)? And again, with my 5ism, I can see him as a 5, although maybe more like my sister with a 6 wing, although I could be wrong. (Maybe they'd both just get a kick out of beating me up...?)

Hahahaha, I wasn't just throwing around numbers. I was thinking about what I know about them, but also trying not to repeat. But I really think there are multiples of some of the types.
0 is a skeptic and is bitter and hasn't watched any of the episodes, not even the premier with her in it. I don't see her as a romantic. She is more logical and a programmer.
1 is a 5. She has a degree in psychological and is always thinking about things psychologically.
2 seems more like a 6 than an 8 to me, but we can agree to disagree.
3 I guess I agree with you on that point
5 got a 2 from me because she is always running charity events and trying to help others and children in need and she runs Child United.
7 can be a 61 then. :-)
8 can be a 79.
9 the description of 8 says I must be strong, which is the persona #9 always tried to convey

[Edit] About the multiple types: with any of them a person can have a "wing" of a neighboring number, where traits from another number can make them act even kind of like a number on a different part of the enneagram, but not quite the same. So it's totally likely some of them were winging it. (Haha. My wittiness is astounding.)

*shrugs* Oh well. I really don't know a lot about 0. Is she really being that bitter about it? Poor thing.

That is a good point with #1... you're good, Robrob. That is a good point... Haha my arguement is dented. (I still want to talk about it to death because I love this stuff, but I'll stop if everyone gets annoyed by it or thinks my points are awkward. :P It is a real problem for 5's.)

2 could really be either, I mean it's based on the what...? 4 hours I know him from...?

That's true about 5. At the same time she really seems like an organized setting-things-up kind of person. I always tend to think in typing things of how you interact rather than why, because usually this is a basis rule... except for the enneagram, which is sort of based on why. So it's hard to say. Maybe I wanted to push that one on her because she reminds me of my aunt...? (I swear they have the SAME VOICE!) And I was trying to see if the pods covered the types... She could be a 1 with a 2 wing or a 2 with a 1 wing. The ever insightful wikipedia says this:

Ones with a dominant Two wing tend to use their moral ideals and desires to move others into a movement for reform. They may be persuasive and seek to enlist other people to help with their good causes.
In more average psychological health they may be adept with political matters but may also become critical and irritable when frustrated.
When unhealthier they may become intolerant, condescending and manipulative. They may deceive themselves about their motives and be self-righteous when their motives are questioned. They may also become hypocrital, develop compulsive habits, or have nervous breakdowns if they are anxious about their self-contradictions.

Twos with a one wing could also be called "Good Samaritans" as they are willing to do thankless tasks that others avoid. They often work as teachers; in healing professions; pastoral ministry or with the poor, handicapped or mentally challenged.
In more average psychological states they may struggle with their "selfish" feelings. They can be dutiful, 'proper' and perfectionistic. They may become emotionally restrained and dislike drawing attention to themselves whilst still wanting to feel important in other people's lives.
They can become very hard on themselves and neglect their health by denying their personal needs and trying to be a martyr.

Either way, 7 is loveable for his faults, and both 3 and 8 are cheerful, fun people. :D

In 9's case... I don't know. 9's here, right? What do you think? Are you a 5 or an 8? I don't really want to be going-behind-your-back-psychoanalyzing-you for anyone who's here. It's better if we have your input, because you know more about you than anybody else does.