| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
Lovejonze |
|||
|
Like he time travelled back or was reincarnated?
|
|||
GodIsAnAtheist |
|||
Lovejonze wrote: More of a general discussion thread to keep us busy over the summer. Why did he change his name? Why is he off-island? What could've happened? etc.
|
|||
Goosehead |
|||
|
The philosopher Jeremy Bentham was a utilitarian, i.e, he rejected the principle that individual rights and liberties were good unto themselves, or in the
abstract. Their advancement or rejection was judged good only to the extent that they helped improve the overall happiness of the majority of a body politic.
Locke was much more of a libertarian, i.e., society only benefits to the extent that individual rights (especially property-rights) and liberties are
vigilantly protected. so I'm thinking this might be the context in which we should try to make sense of the Locke/Bentham nomenclature mystery. My
intuition tells me that the panopticon theme is a red-herring.
|
|||
CC1018 |
|||
Goosehead wrote:Huh??? I always got the idea that Locke felt that his calling to protect the island superceded the individual rights & liberties of every soul on the island. |
|||
Goosehead |
|||
|
I mean that the philosopher John Locke was more of a libertarian. You're right Locke's (the TV character) first priority is the island, and individual
happiness is secondary. I'm just wondering if Locke will experience some kind of shift in values that we're supposed to detect that would correspond to
the different names.
I remember when I first started watching the show, I thought that they chose John Locke for the character's name because of his famous quote: "In the beginning, all the world was America." All he meant by this was that because the indigenous people hadn't settled the land in the same way that Europeans had, and that no property rights existed, it was a mix of hard, rugged, individual labour, protected by legal property rights, that would make America into a flourishing civilisation. So on the island, Locke represents this rugged individual that becomes charged with the responsibility to be the leader in a new society (or something like that, I think the analogy is pretty weak, really). ETA: I just came across this interesting and relevant quote from a guy named Georg Kamphausen "Only by becoming Indians can [the settlers] survive in the colonies; they must return as hunters and gatherers to the first developmental stages of humanity ..."
Last Edited By: Goosehead
05/31/08 3:41 PM.
Edited 2 times.
|
|||