Which was the worst Survivor season? Australian Outback or Thailand? - Lions, Tigers, Survivors - Oh My! - Survivor Related - Survivor Sucks - Message Board - Yuku

logobottom

Home | FAQ

0 Kudo

<< Previous Topic Next Topic >>

Which was the worst Survivor season? Australian Outback or Thailand?

Started By	Comment
Yasothon		#181	[-]
Posts: 253 (12/19/09 6:44 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	Axie wrote: It sure doesn't (after all, Jonny Fairplay and Russhole are VERY entertaining), but Thailand is lacking on both likability and entertainment. When the Grindgate (that was VERY awkward to watch) and the Fake Merge (which, while a twist with potential, served for absolutely no purpose othen than screwing Shii Ann) are the season's highlights, the season is just not good. Anything that Thailand lacks, Australia lacks a lot more. Thailand is not the worst season Australia is! Grindgate was awkward but not as appalling as seeing somebody being burned in a fire! Australia had people who tried to think of winning and actually had emotional reactions when they didn't. Brian was more entertaining than the entire Australia cast combined.
troynuncdicit		#182	[-]
Posts: 742 (12/19/09 7:08 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	Yasothon wrote: solesurvivor123 wrote: ilovekelly752 wrote: I was just rewatching Australia, and Tina and Keith getting the rice had to be one of the best non strategic moments ever, if not the best. That alone puts it above Thailand, imo. You don't get out much do you? Was that exciting as Elisabeth's hair falling out? Lame moments like that got shown because there was nothing that was actually entertaining and interesting to watch that season. Plus it wasn't even a real tragedy because Australia was the cushiest season and it was their fault for building their camp right by the shoreline even though Rodger told them not to. The one good thing about that whole thing was humor in seeing idiots get their just desserts for being utter morons over and over again. X Thailand had way better moments than Australia and it didn't need any producer manipulation to make them emotional. Thailand was real and Australia was full of fake mactors and a bunch of lame people shoved down our throats in the editing. If Australia, one of the most real seasons, especially back when people still applied for the show, what do you call Cooks, Fiji, & Samoa? And this whole thread is dumb. Thailand is a worse season than Outback, but neither are THE worst by any means. They're two great seasons, realize that people.
Warm Cocoa		#183	[-]
Posts: 102 (12/20/09 5:20 AM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	Australian Outback and Thailand are just really dated. They came in a time when reality shows were new and interesting by themselves. I think we all know if they happened in these days they would just destroy the series.
nine9isfine.fgc		#184	[-]
Posts: 1 (12/20/09 11:05 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	Australia was the best season you idiot. The worst season was all the past 6 seasons or so, they all sucked, the editing was crap, the players were crap. Australia had a very distinct and entertaining cast, and there was actually a freaking SURVIVAL ASPECT to the game which there is pretty much none of now. Now I can't tell the difference between most of the players they are all too boring and similar, and a lotta them are just obnoxious. Australia had good genuine people. Either Survivor started sucking more or humanity started sucking more, cuz these past buncha casts have been horribleeeeeeee.
Warhammer		#185	[-]
Posts: 341 (12/23/09 7:29 AM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	Australia has one of the most bland casts ever. If it was ever distinct and entertaining it was only because you had 1 other season to compare it to.

<< Previous Topic Next Topic >>

Quick Reply

Message board courtesy of Survivor Sucks member support.
Benevolent dictatorship courtesy of Survivor Sucks Admin Idoits.