Kitty Pryde1 wrote:Oh, I'm a troll just because I'm a "newbie?" That's so stupid. I don't take myself seriously like Blake. Stop singling me out when there are worst people than me.
BlakeB717 wrote:It's because you have bitched about people picking Natalie. You have bitched about people picking Russell. You have acted to multiple people like they're stupid because they don't think Mick is the winner. And yet you act like Mick fits all these guidelines amazingly just because they're the guidelines that were written down rather than looking at overall editting patterns. You've become SO defensive about your pick that you bring up Bob/Danni's edits to validate your continued picking of Mick. Hell, you bitched out astroline too, who already gets enough shit for thinking outside the box, but you know what? Majority picked Peih-Gee/Amanda for China and were wrong. Majority picked Marcus/Kenny/Matty for Gabon and were wrong. Majority picked Stephen for Tocantins, and were wrong. Thinking outside the box might be just what edgic needs to actually get a pick RIGHT again. Hell, look at Parvati. She had a good episode one, but her pre-merge edit SUCKED. You know what kept people picking her? The fact that she had an early comment related to THEME that was picked up and people carried that to the merge, where Parvati's edit picked up like it's supposed to.
I'm not understanding why I'm not allowed to give people a hard time for supporting edits that start with "UTR1 INV UTR2" or "OTTNN5 CPN5 CPN5" but when I support an edit who fits the most guidelines, I'm scrutinized. Doesn't that make a whole lot of you hypocrites, since you're so pained when I disagree with others, yet you're allowed to be just as horrible when you disagree with me. I can take it, 'cause I can take what I dish out, but it's been at least 3 seasons now of complaining of how I treat people when they support inviable edgic candidates, and now those same people are doing the exact same thing! Eek!
I'm not desperate at all for my Mick pick. I'm just countering those who are saying Mick should be eliminated for his edit because it's "unprecedented". Please find me a winner who fits anything like Russell or Natalie, and we'll dance. Mick is more classic than anyone remaining and his content is decent.
We'll see what happens on Finale night. I know I'll be smiling :)
NO winner has ever gotten four (let's be honest here, SIX) MORs in a row. No winner has EVER had two UTRs in the merge and first post-merge episodes. Hell, even pre-merge, when people were saying they didn't see Mick winning, you said that the merge would be important. Lo and behold, Mick gets UTR1, and suddenly you're on the defensive saying that it was a great UTR for him. You've given him Ps for two of his weakest episodes when he did next to NOTHING. And it seems extremely clear that every argument you make is not based on finding the winner based on Edgic, but finding Edgic based on Mick being the winner. And it's annoying to see you get into fight after fight defending Mick and trashing Natalie supporters and trashing Russell supporters EVERY. FUCKING. CHANCE. YOU GET. You're JUST as bad as they are, and the difference is that the only ones who take themselves as seriously as you do are trolls like Rioot-whatever.
So if you want to support Mick, FINE. I've never eliminated him from my list, just like I don't think I've ever eliminated Jaison, and I've never eliminated Monica, and I've recently stopped eliminating Russell and Natalie. But stop forcing it down our throats as the ONLY right way. Stop bringing up past winners to say that Mick is like them. Mick is NOT like Ethan. Mick is NOT like Bob or Danni. Mick is NOT like Vecepia. Mick's edit is unique. Natalie's edit is unique. Russell's edit is unique. Jaison's edit is unique. Whoever wins this season, it will be an edit we've NEVER seen before, so even try to act like you're picking Mick based on Edgic. You're as stubborn as anyone else, and your arrogance has pissed me off so much these past few weeks that I just cannot tolerate it anymore. Get off your high horse and look at OTHER players' edits for a change. Don't write EVERYONE off just because you're so sure Mick will win. If he does? Great, congrats for you. But you know what? More people think Mick DOESN'T win than those that do, and MANY of those Mick voters are people who follow the "pick a winner pre-merge and stick to it" mantra. So stop being so fucking self-righteous and for ONE season, can you PLEASE just keep your opinions to yourself?
Christ.





