| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
PassionatePiscesMan |
|||
|
They are huge boon to those who hire illegals at low wages and then don't pay the taxes.
|
|||
UrbanSprawl |
|||
merkyl wrote: Nope, just your bigotry speaking. And in a 2007 report, the White House Council of Economic Advisers asserted that, over the long haul, immigrants end up paying off: That's 80,000 dollars per person. A great investment for any state. |
|||
Zzunk |
|||
|
UC, you weren't even born when Prop. 13 passed. Parts of it was badly needed, but it had it's flaws, too. The people who voted it in were concerned
that property taxes were escalating at the same rate of the price of homes -- 5 to 10 percent a year. It simply rolled back the real estate values (bad idea)
and restricted the tax to 1% (should have been 1.5%). Most people did not understand that it bound the legislature on other and future tax issues -- this is
why ballot measures should only be one topic!! Still, Californians keep electing people to their legislature that are bleeding heart liberals that have no
sense of financial responsibility. Blame the inept voters for electing inept legislators. If there was ever a time for a Republican revolution in California,
it's now.
|
|||
merkyl |
|||
|
Perhaps you should head over to dictionary.com and look up "likely", "projections" and "uncertainty". And one study does not
"proven" make. Even someone who pretends to be smart like you should know that, child molester.
|
|||
Licorice |
|||
The Annoying Hater wrote: I think everyone across the entire political spectrum is to blame. |
|||
UrbanSprawl |
|||
|
Proposition 13 is fundamental if you're talking about the current economic breakdown. By getting rid of local taxes (pushing power away from local
districts to Sacramento) and by tying the hands of state bureaucrats at either raising taxes or passing budgets, you make it impossible to respond in
emergencies or respond to deficits.
State bureaucrats are only as accountable as the power they yield in the state- which isn't very much because the people have taken the majority of that power away. As for a republican revolution in California. We already had that in replacing Gray Davis with Arnold Schwarznegger. There are a lot of Republicans cheering on for the state to fail (and casting votes to aid in the failure of the state) to prove to themselves that their government-is-a-perpetual-failure-machine ideology correct. But I think this is more emblematic of everything that's wrong with republicans (and partly what's wrong with the state government) than what's right. |
|||
Monsieur Muggles |
|||
|
Arnold had no say over the economy (what initiated this catastrophe in the first place). Gray Davis was awash in money with the dot-com boom money and still
managed to be a failure.
|
|||
UrbanSprawl |
|||
|
A huge part of our deficit is due to Schwarzenegger's cutting of the vehicle licensing fee. So he too is largely responsible for the debt.
|
|||
Licorice |
|||
UrbanSprawl wrote: Not only are they sick in the head, they are complete idiots. If they get their wish and everything collapses, do they really think the public will be running to the "do nothing" crowd to save them? |
|||
merkyl |
|||
|
So the official retard spin is it's all the republicans in California's fault?
|
|||
The Annoying Hater |
|||
UrbanSprawl wrote:You seem to think taxes is the answer to everything. Californians are already the most taxed in the country, our businesses already have the worst tax burden in the nation. The blame for this mess falls 99% on the Dems in this state. They spend and borrow money like there's no tomorrow, and their encouragement of illegal immigration for votes has decimated our budget. |
|||
PassionatePiscesMan |
|||
|
"And in a 2007 report, the White House Council of Economic Advisers asserted that, over the long haul, immigrants end up paying off:
The long-run impact of immigration on public budgets is likely to be positive. Projections of future taxes and government spending are subject to uncertainty, but a careful study published by the National Research Council estimated that immigrants and their descendants would contribute about $80,000 more in taxes (in 1996 dollars) than they would receive in public services." I love the way idiots quote this finding. Sure it may be true BUT they say immigration without separating legals from illegals. Illegals for the most part are a heavy tax burden on the average legals. |
|||
Monsieur Muggles |
|||
merkyl wrote:Well, UC is leading the argument. |
|||