It's time to rightfully crown Natalie Bolton as the winner of Micronesia.

0 Kudo

Started By	Comment
Thailandsurvivor		#181	[-]
Posts: 6435 (04/26/09 5:41 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite
PostnumberZERO		#182	[-]
Posts: 242 (04/26/09 5:56 PM) REALLY slow learner Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	if anything else, she was the last fan standing.
Mikester		#183	[-]
Posts: 2022 (04/26/09 6:00 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	Thailandsurvivor wrote: She could have, but like I've said, she was in a good position no matter which side she chose. And she was heading towards a final 6 of 3 favorites and 3 fans (where she thought she'd be able to sway either Parvati due to their relationship or Cirie with the purple rock threat). Was James going next if he hadn't been injured? Because if not, she was headed to a final 6 of 4 favorites and 2 fans, and a final 5 of 3 favorites and 2 fans. So she probably would have ended up in the same position. Natalie probably didn't need to keep Jason to be able to make the final 5, in either scenario. But had she done that, she could have had control until the end of the game.
Thailandsurvivor		#184	[-]
Posts: 6436 (04/26/09 6:02 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	Mikester wrote: Was James going next if he hadn't been injured? Yes. Parvati wanted him gone, too.
CSCin3D		#185	[-]
Posts: 11833 (04/26/09 6:21 PM) Registered user Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	That's totally speculative bullshit and you know it. Unless you're retarded. Erik easily could have gone before James, espesh considering that he was by far the bigger immunity threat.
Thailandsurvivor		#186	[-]
Posts: 6437 (04/26/09 6:25 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	CSCin3D wrote: That's totally speculative bullshit and you know it. Unless you're retarded. Erik easily could have gone before James, espesh considering that he was by far the bigger immunity threat. Erik won immunity at the final 8. That's it at that point. Considering how big James is, how the fuck was he considered the by far bigger threat? Besides, the girls were ALL cheering for Erik at the final 8 over both Jason and James. Oh yeah, and James let it be known that he had problems with Parv and Cirie "biting the apple". ETA- James even voted for Parv when Jason left. Last Edited By: Thailandsurvivor 04/26/09 6:29 PM. Edited 1 times.
survivorisdabest		#187	[-]
Posts: 2849 (04/26/09 10:06 PM) Registered User Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	I never said she wasn't thinking long term, but for her to get to a point where she could blindside Ozzy, she needed to gain some support on her tribe short term in case Airai ever went to tribal council. How hard is that to understand? Um yeah that's why making an alliance with nat and alexis does BOTH things - it gets people so that she can turn on ozzy and it gets people so she can survive until the merge. that is my point. They're back up plan was with Erik. That was shown on the freaking show. Their backup plan was not erik until erik had immunity at final 6. Nat wanted him gone just like the rest of the guys even if it was bad strategically for her. and lol @ you saying a few pages back that they might have had a back up plan but it wasn't shown on the show. stop changing your mind Yet she didn't. I understand that she knew about the idol, but that quote means nothing. She her ready, but ready and doing are two different things. If there was the threat of the purple rock, I do not see how Cirie would be willing to risk her game on it. Now, if she had a final 2 ally at risk, she might stick with them, but it was Amand. Amanda was closer to Parvati than her anyways, and the fans had her fooled that they would take out Erik next. Ok this is the one where i think you are the most wrong. #1-CIRIE SAID that she was ready to force a tie. This argument about "ready and doing" is stupid and you are denying that cirie was going to force a tie #2-Cirie would not enter a F5 where she would be gone first! You keep saying that cirie wouldnt force a tie yet there is blatant evidence that she would have. Stop coming back to this point and just accept that there would be a tie. You mentioned that Alexis wanted Erik out at the final 6, and I am proving that wrong. I will look for what Natalie said about that. That's not what i mentioned, i mentioned that Alexis wanted to keep him but natalie didnt
survivorisdabest		#188	[-]
Posts: 2850 (04/26/09 10:08 PM) Registered User Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	And now that we went on that random detour for the last 4 pages can you finally address this: Every season has different rules. Micronesia's rules said that it would be rehidden. End of story. What dont you get about that??? That is the bottom line about why Nat wasn't robbed.
Thailandsurvivor		#189	[-]
Posts: 6448 (04/26/09 10:08 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite
survivorisdabest		#190	[-]
Posts: 2851 (04/26/09 10:11 PM) Registered User Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	lol is that the one about pizza>>>>first sexual experience? i love that one?
Emcee Batley		#191	[-]
Posts: 497 (04/26/09 10:37 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	Natalie was sexist.
Thailandsurvivor		#192	[-]
Posts: 6466 (04/27/09 2:07 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	Um yeah that's why making an alliance with nat and alexis does BOTH things - it gets people so that she can turn on ozzy and it gets people so she can survive until the merge. that is my point. Um. Ok? What does that have to do with anything? Their backup plan was not erik until erik had immunity at final 6. Nat wanted him gone just like the rest of the guys even if it was bad strategically for her. and lol @ you saying a few pages back that they might have had a back up plan but it wasn't shown on the show. stop changing your mind Natalie and Alexis wanted Erik in the final 4. Why do you think Natalie was so pissed off when the final 5 round at Erik throwing her under the bus? Why was Natalie able to convince him to give up immunity? They had a relationship, that's why. It wasn't shown because the fans "had to" be edited like morons. I said they did have a back up plan because they did, but you are right, it wasn't shown on the show. We can't take away from Cirie and Parvati's 10 confessionals an episode each. She also had a good relationship with Parvati which she tried to use. Ok this is the one where i think you are the most wrong. #1-CIRIE SAID that she was ready to force a tie. This argument about "ready and doing" is stupid and you are denying that cirie was going to force a tie #2-Cirie would not enter a F5 where she would be gone first! You keep saying that cirie wouldnt force a tie yet there is blatant evidence that she would have. Stop coming back to this point and just accept that there would be a tie. Ok. If she forced a tie, she would be an idiot, but if there is "blatant evidence", it must be true. Come on. We have no idea what she would do with the purple rock threat staring her in the face. Natalie and Alexis were not turning on each other, and Erik won immunity. She would be stuck between a rock and a hard place deciding, and she would also be ridiculed if she left the game based on that. Also, what was Parvati's back up plan if Amanda is sent home at the final 5? Natalie. Had that happened, it would be edited the exact same way except flipped. Natalie would be the mastermind with Parvati following. This is why I didn't like Micronesia, the editing was so fucking biased.
hagiz1		#193	[-]
Posts: 586 (04/27/09 2:14 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	Thailandsurvivor wrote: Um yeah that's why making an alliance with nat and alexis does BOTH things - it gets people so that she can turn on ozzy and it gets people so she can survive until the merge. that is my point. Um. Ok? What does that have to do with anything? Their backup plan was not erik until erik had immunity at final 6. Nat wanted him gone just like the rest of the guys even if it was bad strategically for her. and lol @ you saying a few pages back that they might have had a back up plan but it wasn't shown on the show. stop changing your mind Natalie and Alexis wanted Erik in the final 4. Why do you think Natalie was so pissed off when the final 5 round at Erik throwing her under the bus? Why was Natalie able to convince him to give up immunity? They had a relationship, that's why. It wasn't shown because the fans "had to" be edited like morons. I said they did have a back up plan because they did, but you are right, it wasn't shown on the show. We can't take away from Cirie and Parvati's 10 confessionals an episode each. She also had a good relationship with Parvati which she tried to use. Ok this is the one where i think you are the most wrong. #1-CIRIE SAID that she was ready to force a tie. This argument about "ready and doing" is stupid and you are denying that cirie was going to force a tie #2-Cirie would not enter a F5 where she would be gone first! You keep saying that cirie wouldnt force a tie yet there is blatant evidence that she would have. Stop coming back to this point and just accept that there would be a tie. Ok. If she forced a tie, she would be an idiot, but if there is "blatant evidence", it must be true. Come on. We have no idea what she would do with the purple rock threat staring her in the face. Natalie and Alexis were not turning on each other, and Erik won immunity. She would be stuck between a rock and a hard place deciding, and she would also be ridiculed if she left the game based on that. Also, what was Parvati's back up plan if Amanda is sent home at the final 5? Natalie. Had that happened, it would be edited the exact same way except flipped. Natalie would be the mastermind with Parvati following. This is why I didn't like Micronesia, the editing was so fucking biased. Who cares?
Thailandsurvivor		#194	[-]
Posts: 6468 (04/27/09 2:30 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	Obviously you since you keep posting in here. (Cue a "At least I'm not stupid" comeback.)
JackSparrowBauer		#195	[-]
Posts: 882 (04/27/09 6:51 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	I'm just going to throw in my two cents, not that anybody cares. Natalie did make stupid decisions and wasn't focsued on setting herself up to win the whole time. With that being said, I think if Amanda got out at F6, then Natalie probably would've won, but even that's not a guarantee with no idol. Cirie said she was going to force a tie, but I wouldn't have been surprised if a fan ending up leaving by another method, because Parv, Cirie and Amanda are all very good players, and if they had half the votes right there, I doubt they would just sit there and let the fans force a tie. They were passive at the F6 vote because they knew Amanda had the idol, and that's why Amanda got 4 votes. I guess I'm just saying that with no idol, the Final 6 would've been a COMPLETELY different situation. Now I seethingly LOVE Natalie, but her game wasn't all that good. It was really stupid of her to boot Jason, and she made it difficult for herself/Erik/Alexis to all survive the F6TC. As other people have said, Cirie wouldn't have given in to the fans at F6 just to save herself, when she would've gotten voted out in 5th place. That's not Cirie.
Surfing Hippo in Trouble		#196	[-]
Posts: 989 (04/27/09 10:32 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	Catalie <33333333333333 Favorite fan that season. Probably one of the least sane contestants ever. Her jury question <333333
MajorTom		#197	[-]
Posts: 491 (04/28/09 12:34 AM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	Clem Clem <3 Don't fret everyone, she'll win the next all-star season. I just hope her opening statement is absurdly lesbionic.
Olmec Donald		#198	[-]
Posts: 443 (04/28/09 1:39 AM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	Send this crappy thread to LTS immediately.
survivorisdabest		#199	[-]
Posts: 2870 (04/28/09 3:51 AM) Registered User Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	Obviously we aren't going to agree on two things. #1-I think Erik would have been voted off had he not won immunity at F6 #2-I think that Cirie would have forced a tie (because she SAID SO) You think the opposite we've gone back and forth between those two and neither of us are changing our opinions unless natalie/erik/cirie themselves come along and tell us so lets leave that already and get back to the point of the thread: Every season has different rules. Micronesia's rules said that it would be rehidden. End of story. What dont you get about that???
survivorisdabest		#200	[-]
Posts: 2871 (04/28/09 3:54 AM) Registered User Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	And yes of course nat would have had a great chance of winning had amanda left at F6 and it was a cirie/parv/nat/alexis/erik F5, im not denying that. the fact is that amanda DIDNT get voted off at the final 5 because she played the situation perfectly and because the fans couldnt organise themselves enough not to send someone they wanted gone to exile.

<< Previous Topic Next Topic >>

Yuku free message boards

It's time to rightfully crown Natalie Bolton as the winner of Micronesia.

Quick Reply