| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
 Drew B |
|||
|
Posts: 4868 (04/07/09 10:22 AM) Registered User |
Duke of Nerd wrote: WHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? If the judge could call her back, so what? Nearly every other "celebrity" on this show is missing tasks left and right due to their myriad "prior commitments"... |
||
|
anders332 |
|||
|
Posts: 1684 (04/07/09 10:22 AM) |
Oh shut the fuck up already will ya..............
|
||
|
Duke of Nerd |
|||
|
Posts: 2161 (04/07/09 10:25 AM) I need a hobby |
So, if the judge suddenly orders a "contempt of court" notice on Chloe.....you consider that a prior commitment?
Business commitments are one thing.....criminal mischief punishment is totally different. I can't believe you people think she is in being mistreated. |
||
|
Drew B |
|||
|
Posts: 4870 (04/07/09 10:30 AM) Registered User |
Duke of Nerd wrote: If her absence wasn't planned and excused, then you have a point. However, on the day of the hotel challenge, Trump told Athena that Khloe would be out that day due to a previous commitment. It's not like he didn't know, and if he didn't excuse her, he should have just told her not to return at all. And, no, I don't see the distinction you are drawing between types of commitments that cause absenteeism. If anything, I think the criminal one is MORE excusable because it is beyond the contestants' control. Their business commitments are their own doing, and if they were serious about their commitment to this show, they could have cleared their schedules... |
||
|
Duke of Nerd |
|||
|
Posts: 2162 (04/07/09 11:04 AM) I need a hobby |
WHAT?
In a way, these people are doing a long, drawn out job interview ....or a small internship. In the real world, people would see that someone who was up for the job was having to finish up legalities related to a DUI, and it already caused one abscence for them. Why would someone want to hire that person? You already know they've recently been foolish in their personal life....and yes, it DOES matter. And you keep assuming Trump knew all about Chloe. I think he didn't. I think Trump is fairly honest in talking to people. As soon as he knew about her, he called her out. |
||
|
anders332 |
|||
|
Posts: 1686 (04/07/09 11:19 AM) |
|
||
|
Drew B |
|||
|
Posts: 4871 (04/07/09 11:36 AM) Registered User |
Duke of Nerd wrote: Perhaps that is the case with the regular "Apprentice". This is not that. At the end of the process, the winner is not going to be working for Trump or his organization. I'm not sure why you are acting as thought he is actually making a decision about somebody who will eventually be an executive on his payroll, when that is the furthest thing from the truth. If he was actually going to HIRE one of these people, at least 80% would never have made it past the first interview... |
||
|
Duke of Nerd |
|||
|
Posts: 2167 (04/07/09 12:03 PM) I need a hobby |
What are you talking about?
Bierce was supposed to be the head of Trump charities for some given time. They will be working for Trump on some level. |
||
|
anders332 |
|||
|
Posts: 1689 (04/07/09 12:11 PM) |
Who the fuck is Bierce?
|
||
|
Drew B |
|||
|
Posts: 4872 (04/07/09 12:17 PM) Registered User |
Duke of Nerd wrote: Do you have any evidence to support that? Because I think it's flat-out untrue. Pierce won a ton of money for his charity. That was his prize - not a job... He already has a job. SEVERAL, in fact... |
||
|
PinotEnvy |
|||
|
Posts: 1481 (04/07/09 12:49 PM) Registered user |
Is this Bierce aka Pierce that you are talking about PIERS MORGAN, last year's winner? |
||
|
Duke of Nerd |
|||
|
Posts: 2171 (04/07/09 1:05 PM) I need a hobby |
Of course....I knew it had some weird spelling or was pronounced weird.
No matter how you spin it......the winner works for Trump in some capacity. |
||
|
Drew B |
|||
|
Posts: 4874 (04/07/09 1:10 PM) Registered User |
Duke of Nerd wrote: Prove it. I think that statement is CATEGORICALLY UNTRUE. |
||
|
Duke of Nerd |
|||
|
Posts: 2174 (04/07/09 1:15 PM) I need a hobby |
TRUMP SAID Piers was gonna be the head of his charity division as his employee.
It wasn't just some grand huge prize for your charity. |
||
|
PinotEnvy |
|||
|
Posts: 1482 (04/07/09 1:44 PM) Registered user |
Drew B wrote:Yeah, I don't remember Piers actually having to work for Trump as a prize for winning. All Piers got was the title of winning and never being fired, plus an extra 250k for his charity over all the money he raised for the final task. It's ridiculous to think the winning celebrity would actually have to work for Trump. Who the hell would want to work for that asshole? Just desperate people and fellow crooks. |
||
|
Duke of Nerd |
|||
|
Posts: 2180 (04/07/09 2:07 PM) I need a hobby |
Huh?
Lots of people would want to work for Trump. Certainly not drunks.....but other people would. |
||
|
Drew B |
|||
|
Posts: 4875 (04/07/09 3:44 PM) Registered User |
Duke of Nerd wrote: I don't recall such a statement at all. Do you have any evidence? If Piers is working for the Donald, it shouldn't be hard to find a record of it... I just read several news stories about him winning the show and not one of them said ANYTHING about him being slated to go to work for Trump in any capacity. |
||
|
Duke of Nerd |
|||
|
Posts: 2188 (04/07/09 4:08 PM) I need a hobby |
You probably just read the right stories.
You better keep reading articles about it. |
||
|
Drew B |
|||
|
Posts: 4881 (04/07/09 4:41 PM) Registered User |
Well, I can't prove that he didn't - you can't disprove a negative. I could mention a million articles that don't say he works for Trump, but
that wouldn't be proof.
You, on the other hand, theoretically COULD prove that he does work for Trump (if it were true). You choose not to. Why is that? |
||
|
Duke of Nerd |
|||
|
Posts: 2192 (04/07/09 4:58 PM) I need a hobby |
Geeze dude....I didn't even know how to spell his name.
Have you ever tried to find information for stuff you don't know how to spell? It's not very easy. |
||
