I loved watching these two from the beginning, and rooted for them from the beginning. Okay, I was a little disappointed that the jury didn't seem to know
the brilliance that was Stephen, but I had to admit in the end that Stephen's jury performance really sucked and that lost him a few potential votes. I was
happy with the outcome--in the end JT deserved the win because when it came down to it, his game was more well-rounded than Stephen's (where Stephen
focused soley on strategy). I think the moment I realized the well rounded play of JT was when he sent Wacky Wade to exile without offending him---he just used
Wacky's own philosophy against him in a really gentle way. Wow, sweet guy.
Stephen is sweet too... and I suspect his moments of sweetness during the last leg of the game were definately downplayed in lue of a sneaky snake edit. Shame (because it only encourages certain stereotypes).
That's why these two are so great--they are both very smart, very genuine, very real, and very very sweet.
Stephen is sweet too... and I suspect his moments of sweetness during the last leg of the game were definately downplayed in lue of a sneaky snake edit. Shame (because it only encourages certain stereotypes).
That's why these two are so great--they are both very smart, very genuine, very real, and very very sweet.
