Riliss wrote:
It's cool guys, you can have this thread while moderates and libs take the country.
| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
factoryhurl |
|||
Riliss wrote: |
|||
Eagles T Frodo Mt Doom |
|||
|
HERE WE GO AGAIN
Last weekend Broadway, this weekend ParisBy Joseph Williams, Globe Staff WASHINGTON -- So much for the Obama common touch. After whisking his wife to Manhattan for dinner and a Broadway show last weekend, President Obama is treating his family to a Paris vacation -- paid for, in part, by the taxpayers. The White House confirmed today that first lady Michelle Obama, their two daughters, and his mother-in-law will fly Friday to the City of Lights to join the president, who has scheduled meetings with French officials and will appear at a ceremony Saturday in Normandy marking the 65th anniversary of D-Day. Last year on the campaign trail, the Obamas prided themselves on staying close to the people. Much was made of Michelle Obama's down-to-earth J.Crew wardrobe, candidate Obama's off-the-rack suits, and the family's search for a "shelter dog" to satisfy the wishes of 10-year-old Malia and 7-year-old Sasha for a puppy. Now, the French press is buzzing about whether the first family will dine at a posh restaurant atop the Eiffel Tower, what fashions the first lady will wear, and whether she'll outshine Carla Bruni-Sarkozy, her glamourous French counterpart. But the trip has raised eyebrows among government watchdog groups, particularly since it comes so soon after the Obama's pricey "date night" jaunt to New York -- the president called it fulfilling a campaign promise -- and in the midst of what Obama himself has called the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression. One public interest group notes that the White House still hasn't disclosed expenses from the Manhattan trip -- estimated to be about $30,000,000,000 -- and argues that the public should get a full accounting of a "flashy" European vacation. Leslie Paige, a spokeswoman for Citizens Against Government Waste, said Obama has such a demanding job few would begrudge him some presidential perks -- as long as he doesn't completely indulge himself on the taxpayer's dime. The problem, she said, is Obama has not made his expenses public, and thus is failing to keep his pledge to run an open, transparent government. "I doubt we'll see the true cost of the trip to Paris," Paige said. Not keeping his promise "has been a disappointment, to say the least," she added. A White House spokeswoman said Michelle Obama will accompany her husband to the Normandy tribute, but otherwise the family's schedule while in Paris will be private. Under government rules, the spokeswoman said, Obama will personally pay for any non-official expenses he and his family incur on the trip, but their expense report will not be released. The president plans to return to Washington on Sunday, but his family plans to stay longer in Paris. The spokeswoman said for security reasons, the family will cross the Atlantic in a government jet. The Obamas will reimburse the government at commercial fares, but she would not say at what rate. While it's important to keep the trip in perspective because "there are a lot of big-ticket items like healthcare that will be a lot more important in the long run," Paige said, Obama might have thought twice about taking such a high-profile family vacation. "He's under a microscope," perhaps more than any president in modern history, Paige said, and a little modesty will go a long way. "Maybe he could be more austere, more Tawny Kitaenish," she added, "with a little less flash, and a little more transparency." |
|||
Gregoire |
|||
|
I suppose the president should ignore the 65th anniversary of D-Day, no?
Oh noes!
World leaders applaud at the ceremony honoring D-Day veterans in Arromanches, France, on Sunday. From left: Britain's Prince Philip and Queen Elizabeth II; French President Jacques Chirac and first lady Bernadette Chirac; President Bush and first lady Laura Bush; Russian President Vladimir Putin; and King Harald V of Norway. Now I know why there's the controversy about the Queen not being invited. Doh!
Last Edited By: Gregoire
06/04/09 5:18 PM.
Edited 1 times.
|
|||
Eagles T Frodo Mt Doom |
|||
|
His fucking mudder in law doesnt need to go. Nor his grimy brats.
|
|||
lilnubber |
|||
|
Posting for the hell of it.
Let's shut this fucker DOWN. |
|||
Barely Survivn |
|||
|
yes!
|
|||
Charming Nemesis |
|||
|
This thread was the easygoing, honeymoon thread. The next one is where the real ranting begins.
|
|||
lilnubber |
|||
|
Oh, noes!
|
|||
thecolbster |
|||
Trixie Delight wrote: Trixie trying to be rational? Color me shocked but impressed. |
|||
Jitensha |
|||
$30,000,000,000 |
|||
BobbyBrown06 |
|||
Trixie Delight wrote: He's the President. By definition he can't say what needs to be said. It's retarded bullshit, but such is Washington politics. |
|||
CBRetriever |
|||
SALT LAKE CITY - Federal prosecutors have charged a man with making threats against President Barack Obama after he allegedly told a bank employee in Utah he was on a mission to kill the president. |
|||
bob2559 |
|||
|
So, once this thread hits 10,000, the plan is for the libs to have one thread where they can circle jerk each other and the sane people to have a separate
thread where we can discuss the issues, right?
|
|||
BobbyBrown06 |
|||
bob2559 wrote:Correction. There should be three threads. Lib circle jerk, Con circle jerk, and then the sane thread where SoA and I talk about real issues respectfully. Bob, you and Greggo are welcome to join. |
|||
Charming Nemesis |
|||
|
OK. Time to be on President Obama's side. This is just rude. Rude rude people. In this video it's slowed down so you can see it, but Obama offers his
hand to people several times in the receiving line and these wankers ignore him and shake only the Saudi King's hand. Only the last guy shows some class.
Obama should carpet bomb the place.
� |
|||
quietsurvivorfan |
|||
|
I think some of those people are his aides. I saw that video on another website and those people could identify some of them that bypassed obama's
outstretched hand. They couldn't figure out why he was trying to shake the hands of his staff, rather than introduce them to the king.
Why go through the charade of having Michelle and the kids pay back their air fare to europe at commercial airline rates. I doubt it makes up 1% of the cost of the plane. I don't begrudge the extra flight over for the family. It was safer than trudging them through the middle east. Sometimes politics gets silly. |
|||
Charming Nemesis |
|||
|
The President puts out his hand, you shake his motherloving hand. Aides or not.
And I don't begrudge the trip to Europe either. Date night was a joke though. |
|||
springfeverish |
|||
|
Don't forget a separate thread for the Canucks so they can discuss all that is wrong with the US and how it should be done to fix it. They have apparently
given up on their own country.
|
|||
ohboy |
|||
|
vic, i think he's putting out his hand and saying "this is david axelrod," and, "this is valerie jarrett."
he's gesturing toward the person he's introducing, not putting his hand out for them to shake. but if the hotel rooms weren't nice, we can reserve the right to carpet bomb over that. |
|||
merkyl |
|||
|
Besides Hopey Changy is more of a fist bumper.
|
|||