Can you please get Denim Goddess Kelly Czarnecki to post here?! I don't think anyone really hates you, but surely anyone here who did would fall forever in love with you if Kelly blessed us with her presence. thx!
| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
Joaqenix |
|||
|
CHARLIE I HAVE A VERY IMPORTANT QUESTION
Can you please get Denim Goddess Kelly Czarnecki to post here?! I don't think anyone really hates you, but surely anyone here who did would fall forever in love with you if Kelly blessed us with her presence. thx! |
|||
chapera rocks |
|||
2. You can trust that she knows what the editing implied she SHOULD do.And given that she actually did flip and she confirms it post-show, there is more evidence to support her flipping than not. 3. Who had Sugar? Crystal, Ken and Matty? Nobody ever had Sugar. Not Ace. Not Crystal or Ken. Not Matty. Didn't she prove that over and over again?Sugar has said that she was with Kenny and Crystal, and also had alliances with Matty and Bob. She decided what to do with that once the endgame came around. 4-6. Of course not. Why would he do that? Switching sides to vote with a minority is a much different strategy than switching sides to avoid a tie or being a target. And also, YES, Matty did turn on them with a quickness.Matty could have flipped at final 10 also. He could have told them that Sugar had the idol, but no ... he helped concoct the idea that Sugar played it already, and Corinne/Charlie/Randy targeted him and he KNEW that. He could have flipped at final 9 and had numbers... he didn't. Bob said that Matty was uninterested in flipping. Did Matty bitch about Fang? Yeah, but he wasn't flipping, there was nothing to back it up, especially since he could have but didn't. 7. Again, SUGAR had the idol. NOT FANG. Sugar was not loyal to Fang. Sugar completely destroyed Fang in favor of Kota (Bob). So...no.Go and watch Sugar's insider video about voting out Charlie. She says "it was never a decision for me, I'm Fang now." You are 100% underestimating Sugar ... she was playing brilliantly to make the finals (just not to win) and she's no idiot, she knew her only chance of getting to the end was with Fang. Not only that, but she hated Corinne and Randy. She wasn't going to let them take the majority. Its simple game logic: Using the idol to protect an ally (which she even ended up doing with Matty, she gave it away), thus gaining a majority (an alliance of 5 in which she had two factions vying for her vote) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> her, a self-proclaimed poor challenge performer, using the idol once at final 6/7 and then having to win immunity every time to get to the end. And Sugar didn't play for Bob until final 6 after she decided to turn on Crystal/Kenny. If Bob lost that final 7 challenge, he would have been gone. To argue that the onions had the advantage going into a merge is ridiculous ... I think you're a smart gal(?) but your reasoning holds no ground ... Matty wasn't flipping, Sugar was playing to make the final 3, and Fang was tight at that point. |
|||
NickF227 |
|||
|
I want people from Sucks Proper to come over here.
Oh fun, Charlie. Well, you were actually bearable(Corcunt and Marcunt </3). Why were you such a 12 year old in Ponderosa? The only explanation I see is that you wanted Marcus to keep sleeping with you. That's probably going to be the only question I'll ask. |
|||
Kartnaller |
|||
|
Charlie, do you think it's cool to ignore someone and make them fell bad just because you're affraid of what your "friends" will think?
|
|||
Katy Carney |
|||
|
Matty couldn't have flipped at ten, he didn't even go to that tribal council. And even IF all of the stars would have aligned and led to five vs. five
(which is a huge if) Sugar and the rest of Fang would still have to know who the Onions were voting for in order to successfully turn the tide in their favor.
It's clearly a better situation for the Onions than what happened.
To summarize, even with two tribes switches and a double boot, all of which screwed over the Onions (and that's undeniable as far as I'm concerned, never in the history of Survivor has being incompetent at challenges actually secured an endgame for an entire tribe by rewarding them with more people from the other tribe to vote off), there still would have had to be a miraculous coming together of an incredibly disjointed group of people in order to overcome the Onions. The entire sequence of events is fishy. The first tribe switch was a pick 'em whose rules were so incredibly specific that it neutralized an otherwise certain Onion majority (or at least even numbers) on both tribes. The second tribe shuffle was a rock draw, allegedly luck based but the ONLY shot that Fang could EVER have a majority on either tribe. Then the immunity challenge, which was CLEARLY intended for individuals and not tribes, prevented a strategic challenge throw which would, again, neutralize Fang. It didn't just happen that way. |
|||
khnum |
|||
|
lol @ everyone asking the same question.
I'm still available for you, btw, Charlie. ;) I clean and cook! |
|||
decisionisfinal |
|||
decisionisfinal wrote: |
|||
snalpoacks |
|||
|
Posts: 1949 (01/13/09 1:34 PM) Stranger with benefits
|
Katy Carney wrote:I think you're half right. The producers did that because they wanted to prevent people from throwing it, but not specifically because they wanted the Onions to be overthrown. That was probably planned long before that alliance was even conceived. Challenge throwing leads to boring and predictable Tribal Councils, so it makes perfect sense why there would be a pseudo-individual challenge after a switch. And thanks for stopping by Charlie. I did not like the Onions at all, but you were definitely the best one of them and I think I could have appreciated you a lot if you had not been in the position you were in. |
||
Pulau Tiga |
|||
|
Charlie, eloquent poster that you are, if you could rank the cast based on who you would have favored most in a jury vote, it would be much appreciated.
Obviously it's not particularly easy to do, but a rough outline would be nice.
|
|||
NickF227 |
|||
Pulau Tiga wrote:Um: 1. Whoever Corrine and Marcus want me to vote for. 2-8: Everyone else. |
|||
Blondzilla5150 |
|||
|
Charlie, I have a slight problem with you referring to yourself as Todd 2.0. If anything Ken was a Todd 2.0, just by the way he thought he was running the
game for a while there. But he didn't end up being a Todd 2.0 at all, which I am quite happy about.
|
|||
Cuauhtemoc Gilmore |
|||
|
Woiuldn't Todd be Charlie 2.0?
|
|||
Frodidnt |
|||
|
STOP BEING MEAN TO CHARLIE> YOU WILL SCARE HIM AWAY> Charcus >33333333333333
|
|||
dontkilloffcharlie |
|||
Frodidnt wrote: i think he knew what he was signing up for when he decided to post here... |
|||
Mister Yuck |
|||
|
REMEMBER WHEN JOHN CARROLL HAD TO SMOKE A CIGARETTE AFTER POSTING WITH BARBARA ANDERSON???
|
|||
star jumper |
|||
chazychaz wrote: I understand you all like Bob the best...as a person. The point, however, is to vote on gameplay...Bob didn't play the game. So, Charlie, my question to you is? how does it feel to be a be a bitter jury member statistic? This is a legit question as I just want people to realize that what Charlie did was not correct. |
|||
VentDeMilo |
|||
|
CHARLIE & MARCUS <3
CHARLIE, JUST IGNORE THE HOMOPHOBICUNTS HERE! |
|||
Cuauhtemoc Gilmore |
|||
|
Jesus fucking christ. The twat is here.
|
|||
unduli clone |
|||
|
1) I've heard that production had issues with you being the second Todd. Do you think that was a fair comparison, and did you play devious out there? From the mini view we got of you and Todd, it seemed a concern based solely on your sexual preference, which is completely unfair. Would you compare yourself to Todd? chazychaz wrote:So New Fang did intentionally throw that challenge to take out a Kota? It's been speculated here, but never confirmed to my knowledge. |
|||
khnum |
|||
|
The rules never said you have to vote for the person who played the best game, just the person you personally felt deserved the award the most. ^_^
Don't worry, Chucky, I got your back. *grabs ass* |
|||