Maybe not the most overt personality out there, but as a player, she did her thing.
-SJ™
| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
SuperJude |
|||
|
I think she played really well with what she had. She was never #1 in anybodies alliance, had no single person she could rely on yet she won the last Immunity
and nearly the game.
Maybe not the most overt personality out there, but as a player, she did her thing. -SJ™ |
|||
jensamember36 |
|||
MJSLawrence wrote: you are sooooo right, i mean after matty winning all those challenges he won, and making those game changing moves, oh and knowing how to start a fire (sundra and becky ownage) and bob, geez this guy was non-stop strategy and entertainment |
|||
Mister Plum |
|||
|
Jesusita deserves this defense thread. Her answers are as good as Todd.
|
|||
Olmec Donald |
|||
|
The number of invisible women in the F4, especially in recent years is just nauseating. Everyone out there has a story to tell, and we deserve to hear it.
Especially such an interesting person like Susie who was hidden away from us all season. It makes for a terrible viewing experience as one of the F4 is almost
automatically rubbed out of contention since we've seen nothing about them to remember who they are.
|
|||
SuperJude |
|||
Olmec Donald wrote: It seems the editing is painfully anti-hispanic for whatever reason. -SJ™ |
|||
micronesia |
|||
|
Suzie failed so miserably during the FTC. Whatever strategy it was that brought you to the end, you should explain to the jury how you did it, and why it was
successful.
Just sitting there saying: "I tried my best, I deserve it" is not really convincing that it was your plan to play it like you did. It just proves that you dont have much of a clue of what happened and that you didnt even have enough brainpower to think of something intelligent during your speech. That might be enough to get a vote from a tard like Matty, but that`s about it. |
|||
jgabler |
|||
|
Posts: 3671 (12/15/08 6:48 AM) Registered User |
Hi Susie!
|
||
SuperJude |
|||
|
I'm amazed at how BAD all three of them were tonight. I really thought Suzie should have taken the Courtney route and openly stated "hey, none of you
thought the old broad would make it and yet here I am" then gone on to present herself as an outsider who made their vote critical.
When she repeated her "my kids, my students" line, I knew there was no hope of her swaying anybody. That has to have been the absolute lamest finals performance I've yet seen in all my seasons of Survivor. -SJ™ |
|||
poshpixel |
|||
|
susie rocks
|
|||
ncassaro |
|||
|
It was pretty bad. I thought Susie would at least mention that she had won two immunities.
|
|||
SPunKeeMonKee |
|||
|
Her FTC performance left much to be desired but Bob and Sugar were 10x worse.. Still, I wish she would've won because it would have been random and kind of
satisfying to see an underdog like Susie come out on top against all those odds.
|
|||
SuperJude |
|||
SPunKeeMonKee wrote:Oh, I meant all three of them. They all generally sucked in their responses. Suzie - "I'm trying" Bob - "I didn't have to strategize" Sugar - "I'm not winning anyway so..." Of course we had some memorable jury questions. Marcus - "Me? Me. ME!" Kenny - "Why yes, Bob, I am going to be pathetic and ask about that Immunity again!" Matty - "Brodude, totally crunchy vibes" Corinne - "I know my best and only shot at some form of post show Mactress is to act mean so...here goes! Not that it's contrived IN THE LEAST!" Randy - "Hey, I'm amusing if I'm your free ticket to the finals and/or you were in the Onion alliance!" Charlie and Crystal were forgettable, which figures. -SJ™ |
|||
finishthemoff |
|||
|
I suspect that Susie talked a lot more that we haven't seen. |
|||
PrettyGoodYear1988 |
|||
|
An open letter to Mark Burnett and Jeff Probst:
|
|||
OZ Keeper |
|||
SuperJude wrote:Ozzy, at least, got a positive edit (in Cook Islands, at least) and is very popular with casual fans. But yes, it is undeniable. |
|||
Will |
|||
|
<3 Sandra <3 Susie.
|
|||
burnettfollower |
|||
|
I like Susie. I think she must have done something right in order to get to the F3 and to recieve 3 votes, which is something I cannot say for some who have
made it to the f2 or 3.
|
|||
survivorjordancontestant |
|||
micronesia wrote:yeah but try explaining anything rational to a bunch of bitter assholes like that jury... |
|||
AmightyRo |
|||
survivorjordancontestant wrote:Again, Susie's votes were simply votes AGAINST Sugar. Same w/ Randy's to Bob. Yep. |
|||
donutsrule |
|||
|
Even if that's the case she got hosed by the editing. Seeing as Bob got a better edit shouldn't the other votes have gone to him?
All we were left with was "Why TF did you vote Susie?" I'm amazed at how BAD all three of them were tonight. I really thought Suzie should have taken the Courtney route and openly stated "hey, none of you thought the old broad would make it and yet here I am" then gone on to present herself as an outsider who made their vote critical. I agree. Maybe she's too nice to do that. lol |
|||