Questions that were never answered

0 Kudo

Started By	Comment
Maniacboy888		#41	[-]
Posts: 2561 (11/16/08 5:38 PM) Registered user Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	Deena's luxury item was a balloon?
5urvivor		#42	[-]
Posts: 202 (11/16/08 5:45 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	WylDawg wrote: How come Zoe voted for John the night he got booted? I thought it was an alliance of 5 that blindsided Zoe's alliance of 4, so who clued her in? That's what I want to know!
PKFA		#43	[-]
Posts: 507 (11/16/08 5:51 PM) Registered User Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	Maniacboy888 wrote: Deena's luxury item was a balloon? Water balloons, yup.
Kirblar		#44	[-]
Posts: 6970 (11/16/08 6:28 PM) Registered user Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	5urvivor wrote: WylDawg wrote: How come Zoe voted for John the night he got booted? I thought it was an alliance of 5 that blindsided Zoe's alliance of 4, so who clued her in? That's what I want to know! It wasn't a real blindside. The Rotu 4 were pretty aware that John was going that night.
ptcruisn56		#45	[-]
Posts: 4881 (11/16/08 6:56 PM) Registered user Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	Oh you are right, well that question is answered.
OnlyMatthew		#46	[-]
Posts: 1357 (11/16/08 8:24 PM) Registered user Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	has mark burnett ever addressed the thought of canadians on survivor?
growsonwalls		#47	[-]
Posts: 3068 (11/16/08 9:19 PM) Registered user Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	I have a few: 1. WHY did they design the F3 IC in Panama EI so that Danielle would win? Surely they realized that it would have been better tv for an endurance showdown between Aras and Terry. 2. Judging from post-show interviews and posts at Sucks, there was clearly a cunty mean side of Amanda, so how come they never showed it on the show? Like, ever? 3. What exactly are the stipends for the third, fourth, fifth, etc place finishers? I know you get 10k just to show up to the reunion.
Dictatorship		#48	[-]
Posts: 5505 (11/16/08 9:24 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	growsonwalls wrote: I have a few: 1. WHY did they design the F3 IC in Panama EI so that Danielle would win? Surely they realized that it would have been better tv for an endurance showdown between Aras and Terry. LMFAO at the notion that the F3 was designed so Danielle could win. Danielle was at a disadvantage in every challenge from day 1-day 37. What horror for her to finally have a slight advantage in one freaking challenge.
Quiddity		#49	[-]
Posts: 4068 (11/16/08 9:48 PM) Registered User Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	Dictatorship wrote: growsonwalls wrote: I have a few: 1. WHY did they design the F3 IC in Panama EI so that Danielle would win? Surely they realized that it would have been better tv for an endurance showdown between Aras and Terry. LMFAO at the notion that the F3 was designed so Danielle could win. Danielle was at a disadvantage in every challenge from day 1-day 37. What horror for her to finally have a slight advantage in one freaking challenge. X. Not that I didn't expect you of all people to come to her rescue right away on this issue ;)
tacobellcanon		#50	[-]
Posts: 188 (11/16/08 9:52 PM) I don't get most of the jokes Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	growsonwalls wrote: I have a few: 1. WHY did they design the F3 IC in Panama EI so that Danielle would win? Surely they realized that it would have been better tv for an endurance showdown between Aras and Terry. I don't get this one either. Clearly they wanted the Aras/Terry F2 they were never going to get, but Danielle winning that challenge negated any slim chance that either Aras or Terry would be retarded and bring the other to the finals. Not that I mind that Danielle won it - it was hysterical to watch her freaking out over her choices.
PrettyGoodYear1988		#51	[-]
Posts: 1180 (11/16/08 10:05 PM) Registered user Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	And seeing her cast a vote for "Terri" was also pretty awesome (especially when you look back and remember the challenges where his name was clearly labeled for all the Survivors to see).
Thailandsurvivor		#52	[-]
Posts: 3035 (11/16/08 10:06 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	What the hell? Why are there so many people (or any at all) supporting the notion that a 20 people season was ever a good idea? There is no reason, and I mean no reason to bring more people other than the fact that they wanted the ridiculous twist in Palau. For Cook Islands, I don't see why they couldn't have had 4 tribes of 4 again and just keep them together. Oh wait, yeah, I do. It's because they didn't make the tribes equal to start off with original Hiki standing no chance compared to the others. I don't understand how it is a good idea to completely erase 90% of what happened by focusing on only 3 or 4 castaways and hiding the rest of being shown on TV. Sure, it may make a good storyline, but Survivor is not a movie. For someone to get treated like Rebecca did is awful.
finishthemoff		#53	[-]
Posts: 12510 (11/16/08 10:18 PM) Registered user Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	tacobellcanon wrote: growsonwalls wrote: I have a few: 1. WHY did they design the F3 IC in Panama EI so that Danielle would win? Surely they realized that it would have been better tv for an endurance showdown between Aras and Terry. I don't get this one either. Clearly they wanted the Aras/Terry F2 they were never going to get, but Danielle winning that challenge negated any slim chance that either Aras or Terry would be retarded and bring the other to the finals. Not that I mind that Danielle won it - it was hysterical to watch her freaking out over her choices. My real problem with that is F3 Reward challenge. It is the most pointless challenge of all time.
Thailandsurvivor		#54	[-]
Posts: 3037 (11/16/08 10:30 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	finishthemoff wrote: tacobellcanon wrote: growsonwalls wrote: I have a few: 1. WHY did they design the F3 IC in Panama EI so that Danielle would win? Surely they realized that it would have been better tv for an endurance showdown between Aras and Terry. I don't get this one either. Clearly they wanted the Aras/Terry F2 they were never going to get, but Danielle winning that challenge negated any slim chance that either Aras or Terry would be retarded and bring the other to the finals. Not that I mind that Danielle won it - it was hysterical to watch her freaking out over her choices. My real problem with that is F3 Reward challenge. It is the most pointless challenge of all time. Hey, if we have to have a final three reward challenge to go back to a final two, then I'm all for it. But China's final four reward challenge THEN a final three made one of the worst episodes of all time. That should probably go in a different thread...although I'm still not sure why they've kept the final three after Fiji's blowout. We know that it was invented because of Terry, but I don't think we've ever been told why it's stayed other than "It makes the game more exciting".
5urvivor		#55	[-]
Posts: 203 (11/16/08 10:33 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	growsonwalls wrote: I have a few: 1. WHY did they design the F3 IC in Panama EI so that Danielle would win? Surely they realized that it would have been better tv for an endurance showdown between Aras and Terry. 2. Judging from post-show interviews and posts at Sucks, there was clearly a cunty mean side of Amanda, so how come they never showed it on the show? Like, ever? 3. What exactly are the stipends for the third, fourth, fifth, etc place finishers? I know you get 10k just to show up to the reunion. The twists and challenges are planned out in advance. They don't just make things up to make better TV
YemaGrl1988		#56	[-]
Posts: 2832 (11/16/08 10:37 PM) Registered user Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	Why have the luxury items been abandoned? It was so nice to see a random polar bear plushie lying around in the middle of the Amazon. Too bad.
tacobellcanon		#57	[-]
Posts: 189 (11/16/08 10:40 PM) I don't get most of the jokes Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	5urvivor wrote: growsonwalls wrote: I have a few: 1. WHY did they design the F3 IC in Panama EI so that Danielle would win? Surely they realized that it would have been better tv for an endurance showdown between Aras and Terry. 2. Judging from post-show interviews and posts at Sucks, there was clearly a cunty mean side of Amanda, so how come they never showed it on the show? Like, ever? 3. What exactly are the stipends for the third, fourth, fifth, etc place finishers? I know you get 10k just to show up to the reunion. The twists and challenges are planned out in advance. They don't just make things up to make better TV Here might be a better question then: why was that challenge really crappy for a F3 challenge?
PrettyGoodYear1988		#58	[-]
Posts: 1181 (11/16/08 10:53 PM) Registered user Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	For someone to get treated like Rebecca did is awful. True. How much would it suck to stay out there 25 days, make it to the Jury, and then over 10 whole episodes only have about five confessionals, most of those being just in the first two episodes, and none on your boot episode. She must have been at home with her family going, "Look, there I am! See, in the background behind Parvati and Jonathan and Candice?"
YemaGrl1988		#59	[-]
Posts: 2834 (11/16/08 11:03 PM) Registered user Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	Rebecca isn't boring at all either. If anyone saw the day she co-hosted the View, you would have a different opinion on her. I think she was ignored since she wasn't part of the whole "OMG 4 vs 8 HOW INCREDIBLE" storyline.
Micronesia Princess		#60	[-]
Posts: 1009 (11/16/08 11:08 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	Thailandsurvivor wrote: What the hell? Why are there so many people (or any at all) supporting the notion that a 20 people season was ever a good idea? There is no reason, and I mean no reason to bring more people other than the fact that they wanted the ridiculous twist in Palau. For Cook Islands, I don't see why they couldn't have had 4 tribes of 4 again and just keep them together. Oh wait, yeah, I do. It's because they didn't make the tribes equal to start off with original Hiki standing no chance compared to the others. I don't understand how it is a good idea to completely erase 90% of what happened by focusing on only 3 or 4 castaways and hiding the rest of being shown on TV. Sure, it may make a good storyline, but Survivor is not a movie. For someone to get treated like Rebecca did is awful. It's more exciting to have more contestants to root for and follow than less in my opinion. A bigger cast gives us the editors a chance to ignore boring castaways without having to give everybody airtime regardless of whether they bring anything entertaining to the show or not

<< Previous Topic Next Topic >>

Yuku free message boards

Questions that were never answered

Quick Reply