| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
 SucksSucks |
|||
|
Posts: 329 (11/15/08 4:11 AM) |
MJSLawrence wrote: Maybe not. Why vote out someone that everyone hates? Everyone would want to take him to the finals |
||
|
survivorjordancontestant |
|||
|
Posts: 1483 (11/15/08 4:32 AM) Registered user |
SucksSucks wrote: simply because they just can't stand living with him any longer. |
||
|
MJSLawrence |
|||
|
Posts: 1732 (11/15/08 4:49 AM) Registered user |
Yeah, no one ever thinks far ahead enough to keep the person everyone hates along for the ride...they always play personal, catty games...so might as well
cross Corinne and Randy out now...
|
||
|
survivorjordancontestant |
|||
|
Posts: 1485 (11/15/08 4:53 AM) Registered user |
MJSLawrence wrote:Well given this cast's more emotional way of making decisions (this season's mastermind got rid of Charlie because of a god-damned grudge) not to mention the seemingly personal connections of those in the ruling alliance, I think it's a safe bet that Corrine and Randy are toast. |
||
|
MyChemicalShowmance |
|||
|
Posts: 1189 (11/15/08 10:09 AM) |
SucksSucks wrote:Jonathan Penner syndrome. Can't risk bringing someone to the end who really did burn all bridges, has no allies, and can say to the jury: "Look, I'm sitting here even with no allies... I played the game hardcore, blah blah blah." Past results have shown it's better to bring a Becky or Danielle along for the ride. This season, that role is fulfilled by Susie, or until last week's episode, possibly even Charlie. |
||
