| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
ZippyDoDa |
|||
|
Well I change the channel now when I see her! Her 15 minutes of fame should be over by now!
|
|||
Strange Flute |
|||
|
I predict Sarah's future spread in Hustler will outsell Cindy's Playboy spread.
|
|||
blockhose |
|||
|
I dunno about that... Alaska muff tends to be thick and unruly.
|
|||
someonestolemyfries |
|||
|
Since she needs the foreign policy experience, I'd like to see Sarah do The Amazing Race.
|
|||
meatball77 |
|||
someonestolemyfries wrote:That I could go for. Sara and Todd Governor and First Dude |
|||
ZippyDoDa |
|||
Democrats to White House: Preserve your records - we're looking at you, CheneyThursday, November 13th 2008, 2:51 PM WASHINGTON - Senate Democrats on the Intelligence and Judiciary Committees last week told the White House to preserve all records produced by the Bush administration and expressed "particular concerns" whether Vice President Dick Cheney's office will comply with the law. "We believe it is vital the presidential and vice presidential documents belonging to the American people be preserved, including those related to key national security decisions in which the (office of the vice president) played an important role," the senators wrote in the Nov. 7 letter to White House lawyer Fred Fielding. The letter was obtained by The Associated Press. RELATED: DEM VICTORY IS PART OF BUSH LEGACYThe letter was sent by Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse of Rhode Island, Sen. Patrick Leahy of Vermont, Sen. John D. Rockefeller of West Virginia and Sen. Dianne Feinstein of California. They asked Fielding to detail steps being taken to preserve White House documents and hand them over to the National Archives and Records Administration. The senators asked whether the White House believes that any notes, document and records created in the White House by the president, vice president and their staffs may be destroyed without first consulting with the archivist of the United States, and if so which ones. It also asks whether Fielding has investigated a Washington Post report that some presidential orders are kept off White House records in a safe in office of the vice president's lawyer. "We have particular concerns ... regarding documents in the possession of the Office of the Vice President," the letter said. Citing ongoing litigation over the preservation of Cheney's records, the senators wrote: "the declarations filed in that case by the Office of the Vice President raise serious concerns about its interpretations of the (Presidential Records Act)." The 1978 Presidential Records Act requires all presidential and vice presidential records to be transferred to the Archives immediately upon the end of the president's last term of office and gives the archivist responsibility to preserve and control access to presidential records. The law ended the tradition of private ownership of presidential papers, opening White House records to the public and historians. In 2003, Cheney began asserting that the vice president's office is not an entity within the executive branch. White House spokesman Tony Fratto in an e-mail called the leak of the letter "a partisan attack by Senate Democrats." "We do not need to be reminded about the Presidential Records Act by Chairman Leahy," he wrote. A Senate official with knowledge of the letter said there is no indication the White House is destroying documents. Cheney's office is embroiled in a lawsuit filed by Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington which is trying to ensure that no presidential records are destroyed or handled in a way that makes them unavailable to the public. Melanie Sloan, executive director of CREW, said Cheney's position on the status of the vice president's office raises questions whether his records will be preserved in accordance with the Presidential Records Act. In a deposition taken by CREW Monday, an Archives staff member who works on presidential materials said some of the vice president's records generated in his capacity as the president of the Senate may be exempt from the law if they are "purely political or partisan." Records of Cheney's dealings with the Republican National Committee would not require preservation under the act, Nancy Kegan Smith, the archives official, said during the deposition. Smith also said NARA has not made a final decision on the status of Cheney's records produced when he acts as president of the Senate. Clare O'Donnell, Cheney's deputy chief of staff, was being deposed by CREW for the lawsuit Thursday. The Bush White House has been most secretive in years, said Steven Aftergood, director of the Project on Government Secrecy at the Federation of American Scientists. "The rate of classification activity hit a record high in the Bush administration. More information was classified more quickly than ever before. But what's worse is that secrecy authority was used to conceal controversial policies involving domestic surveillance, prisoner detention and interrogation," Aftergood said. Human rights and civil liberties advocates are clamoring for more openness in the Obama administration. |
|||
Gregoire |
|||
|
I was thinking America's Next Top Model might be more her speed. Or Wife Swap.
|
|||
meatball77 |
|||
|
She would be good on wife swap. Who would be the best family to send her to?
|
|||
JugheadSpock |
|||
|
The Clintons?
|
|||
Miles Edgeworth |
|||
meatball77 wrote: The Obamas lololol |
|||
Veelicious |
|||
|
The Wrights!
|
|||
Miles Edgeworth |
|||
|
The Osbournes
|
|||
Gregoire |
|||
|
I was going to say the Clintons, except swap her for Bill
|
|||
Veelicious |
|||
|
In TV land we could switch her with Edithe Bunker and drive Archie crazy!! I wonder if he'd notice the difference ...
|
|||
ohboy |
|||
|
the ayres family.
|
|||
Veelicious |
|||
|
Good call Greg, the only lesson she'd learn living will Bill is how to swallow.
|
|||
ZippyDoDa |
|||
|
Check it out.
By Ross Colvin WASHINGTON (Reuters) - How much would you pay for a front row seat to history? Tickets for the swearing-in ceremony of Barack Obama, who will become the United States' first black president on January 20, are already being advertised for thousands of dollars. There's just one small problem: the tickets are not publicly available, at least not yet. They will be released to the public only in the week before the ceremony, says the Joint Congressional Committee on Inaugural Ceremonies. The committee is outraged that the tickets are being advertised for sale on online auction site eBay and other websites since they are meant to be free. One senator is even drawing up legislation to outlaw their sale. EBay spokeswoman Nichola Sharpe said eBay officials met members of the committee on Wednesday and agreed to withdraw all ads for inauguration ceremony tickets. EBay is currently advertising two tickets with a starting bid of $10,000, while online ticket brokers stubhub.com, a unit of eBay, and stagefront.com are advertising tickets between $1,400 and $2,350. Hundreds of thousands of people are expected to converge on Washington to watch Obama take the oath of office on the steps of the U.S. Capitol and address the nation after one of the longest and hardest-fought presidential campaigns in history. Organizers say there is unprecedented enthusiasm for the ceremony itself as well as the balls and parties throughout Washington in the days surrounding it. Some 240,000 tickets will be distributed through the offices of U.S. congressmen and senators for the swearing-in ceremony itself. Many will be given out only the day before to minimize the possibility of people selling them and for security reasons. "This is an event that has been paid for by Congressional appropriation. It is wrong to turn around and sell those tickets. We believe it violates the spirit and intent of the inauguration," Carole Florman, the committee's communications director, told Reuters. Californian Senator Dianne Feinstein plans to introduce and pass legislation during next week's lame duck session of Congress making it illegal to sell the tickets, an aide said, although she has not said how that would be enforced. MAKING MONEY "This inauguration will be the major civic event of our time, and these tickets are supposed to be free for the people. Nobody should have to pay for their tickets," Feinstein said. Danny Matta, owner of online ticket broker greatseats.com, decried Feinstein's planned bill as an attack on capitalism. "This is America. If somebody does have a ticket and wants to sell it why should they be restricted? We are not talking about guns or illicit drugs," he said.Most of the capital's hotels are already booked, with some even offering special inauguration packages costing $100,000 and upward, while some residents are renting out their houses and apartments for astronomical amounts for inauguration week. "Here we are a week after the election and the city is largely booked. That is highly unusual," said Durso, whose association has 96 hotels with 26,000 rooms. This is going to be an awesome party, January 20th. |
|||
Gregoire |
|||
|
I was going to go down for the inauguration. Sounds like maybe I should just watch it on TV?
|
|||
ZippyDoDa |
|||
|
It sounds like it is going to be an awesome gathering, it's history. I think it is going to be very expensive, unless you know somebody!
|
|||
DelosWorld |
|||
|
Governor Granholm in Michigan must be trying to out-looney Al Gore.
Save the US auto industry, save the world!
http://www.cnn.com/2008/P...ranholm.energy/index.html Really. So while you're recharging your car at night in the garage the car batteries will also be powering your home. I wonder how the batteries are being recharged though. Maybe a zero point module like they use on Stargate Atlantis? And what's going to keep your fridge powered the next day when you go to work? |
|||