| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
Elizabeth |
Sarah - hotter with or without glasses |
Lead | |
|
I know Sarah is supposed to be some super-smart, well-educated businesswoman, but I found her to be way better-looking without those glasses!! Last night was
the first time we saw her sans lenses and I found her to be very pretty. Someone please post photographic evidence to support my statement, I don't know
how to take a screenshot
|
|||
kmill |
|||
|
Sarah = not hot. period.
The voice and neuroticism kills it. |
|||
Slasher |
|||
|
I would be willing to bet all of the Slasher's money, and the the Slasher is not poor, that Sarah is hotter than either of the two people who have posted
so far on this thread. Seriously, how many hot people (besides the Slasher) spend their time talking on message boards about how hot other people are? The
Slasher wonders about you strange internet people sometimes.
|
|||
ghostbusted |
|||
|
I am amazed at how often, on so many boards, I encounter this IMHO specious ad hominem response to statements about things like hotness. How is whether the
poster is hot relevant to whether the person being posted about is hot? Does an art or music critic have to be a world class artist or performer to be able to
recognize good work? Does a sports coach need to be an Olympic athlete to coach one?
|
|||
Will |
|||
|
Yep. It always boils down to the "just jealuz" defense. "You say she's ugly because you're just jealous of her beauty!!"
|
|||
maldoror122 |
|||
|
Sarah = hot, period.
With or without glasses. |
|||
smartguy24 |
|||
|
Yeah, for whatever reason she *was* looking much better last night.
|
|||
Slasher |
|||
ghostbusted wrote:This is a fine point, Ghostbusted, the Slasher must confess. Ad hominem attacks are for the weak of mind. Unfortunately, in this case, there was no argument being made that really warranted any mental horsepower, just a dimwitted discussion about the looks of a patently hot bitch. So the Slasher just went for a simlilar tact. My apologies -- the Slasher will try to keep the ad hominem attacks to a minimum. |
|||
Micronesia Princess |
|||
|
Those glasses make her look old
|
|||
Sil 80 |
|||
|
Sarah looks better without her glasses
|
|||
Etxeverria |
|||
|
She is just Fugly period. No other way to say it.
|
|||
Slasher |
|||
Etxeverria wrote:Sure there is -- there are lots of other ways to say it. You could add a comma after "Fugly" and just call her "Fugly" instead of "Fugly period." That is an alternative way. You could also say she is fucking ugly. That is another way. You could say she looks like the back of a bus. Yet another way. You could say she is a boner shrinker. Look at that....another way. The Slasher could go on for pages disproving your point, as inane though your point and the Slasher's efforts to disprove it may be, but the Slasher thinks Sarah is one hot bitch. The Slasher loves Sarah. |
|||
Vibration Nation |
|||
|
Sarah is beautiful
|
|||
Surfing Hippo in Trouble |
|||
|
Sarah's ugly and annoying |
|||
Vibration Nation |
|||
|
No she isn't
|
|||
Elizabeth |
|||
|
I think she's pretty. Just doesn't cake on the makeup like every other female racer this season
|
|||
Dan Down Under |
|||
|
Sarah looks like she'd be a freak in the bed.
Terrence...not so much. |
|||
A Dying Clown |
|||
|
Her glasses have the Penny-Marshall effect of making her eyes look ridiculously tiny
Even with pin-eyes she's way more dateable than the last Sarah (even if she had all her own limbs) |
|||
Skyline |
|||
|
I think she's very attractive because she's got a great personality and natural looks
|
|||
SurvivorFan1989 |
|||
|
Without x1000! I couldn't believe how great she looked without her glasses!
|
|||
Wuming Shi |
|||
|
Sarah is cute either way.
Skyline wrote: X |
|||