| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
Dr Will Hatch two point oh |
AGGH! WHY DO THEY KEEP DOING THAT? |
Lead | |
|
Posts: 5184 (10/02/08 6:04 PM) Registered user |
Removing people from the intro?
|
||
SS MagicMark |
|||
|
They changed the number of castaways in the opening graphic, too.
|
|||
PrettyGoodYear1988 |
|||
|
This is annoying. There won't be a complete intro of all 18 castaways divided into tribes now.
|
|||
Dr Will Hatch two point oh |
|||
|
Posts: 5185 (10/02/08 6:07 PM) Registered user |
You know what, fuck the editors. All the praise they get for being world class, a fucking amateur like me could do a better job
|
||
The Purple Parrot |
|||
|
Corinne's intro was different.
|
|||
PrettyGoodYear1988 |
|||
|
So were Kelly and Bob's.
|
|||
solesurvivor01 |
|||
|
It really does suck. Just keep it the same Goddamit.
|
|||
PrettyGoodYear1988 |
|||
|
I do like the title cards for the tribe names, though. It would just be awesome if Michelle and Gillian were with the other members of Fang.
|
|||
Dr Will Hatch two point oh |
|||
|
Posts: 5186 (10/02/08 6:18 PM) Registered user |
Instead of fucking around on the intro, they should play the Survivor theme at challenges, why don't thjey do that anymore. I bet most people here
don't remember when that used to happen
|
||
sammyhain2364 |
|||
|
Why? It's not like they're going to be on again until the reunion show.
|
|||
Quiddity |
|||
|
I HATE the removal of people from the intro. If they want to do it differently, do something like BB where they're still in the intro, but you can tell
they're out of the game. I HATE that Michelle only got to be in the intro once.
|
|||
mocha frappuccino |
|||
|
Who the fuck cares. Get over it.
|
|||
PrettyGoodYear1988 |
|||
|
It's not the most annoying thing they could do to change the show, but it's also so unnecessary that it just irks me.
|
|||
Dr Will Hatch two point oh |
|||
|
Posts: 5187 (10/02/08 6:22 PM) Registered user |
mocha frappuccino wrote: Obviously I do. It's not nitpicking, removing people from the intro is fucking stupid, there is no reason whatsoever to remove bootees |
||
sken85 |
|||
|
yeah, i hate it too. i was hoping to see the new intro with the tribe names in place, but they had to do it ala Micronesia. i hope they won't do that
stupid "Jury" thing again towards the end of the season.
|
|||
Nicklon |
|||
|
Back to your question...they're doing this to connect with more casual viewers of the show by making it more friendly for audiences to jump into the series
halfway through. If you're voted out pre-jury, chances are, you have little relevance to whatever happens next. (Now, how effective this is in the long run
is a different story, but it is little things like this...)
Ratings man, ratings. But hey, you want to help kill off this show by being anal about intro sequences? Christ. I still have yet to read a valid reason for keeping everyone in. |
|||
Thailandsurvivor |
|||
Nicklon wrote:Tradition. |
|||
SenseiKreese |
|||
|
Yet another reason why The Amazing Race should win the Emmy over Survivor. The full cast in the credit sequence.
|
|||
maximillian |
|||
SenseiKreese wrote: X Stop fucking with the intro, editors! |
|||
Dr Will Hatch two point oh |
|||
|
Posts: 5196 (10/03/08 10:56 AM) Registered user |
Nicklon wrote:I've never heard any casual viewer say "Hey, why are those pre jury boots still in the intro? I better not watch." Fucking with the intro makes absoutly no sense at all, none, there is no reason to fuck with the intro, but they do it anyway. If anything it will confuse casual viewers even more into thinking, "Hey wait a minute, why are the retarded egomaniac editors fucking around WITH THE FUCKING INTRO?" |
||
maximillian |
|||
Dr Will Hatch two point oh wrote: Agreeance. And what they do, cutting people off the show, is not fair to bootees. They are still in the 18-people cast, dammit! Stop treating them like they are some diseases to get rid of! |
|||