| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
Strange Flute |
|||
|
Sarah Palin wants to open up America's untapped energy sources to free ourselves from foreign energy. But what about dead people? Dead people are a source
of both protein for food, but methane and fat for green energy. Why are we not exploiting this vital asset to free ourselves from terrorist supporting states?
Republicans are trying to prevent us from using this asset. Republicans want to help the terrorists. We need to drill babies, drill.
|
|||
Goosehead |
|||
candi7of9 wrote: I guess it's either he convinced them, or there was a demand for a guy like him. Because this sentiment seems to spread well beyond his parish, I suspect it's the latter. If this is the case, it's a structural problem and not just one of isolated charismatic individuals. I think it's dangerous to ignore both, but much more dangerous to ignore the possibility that it's a structural problem. |
|||
Goosehead |
|||
|
Last thing before I got to bed: If you honestly think that Obama is a black supremacist, you shouldn't vote for him. Obviously. But if you think that he
genuinely has America's interest at heart, and he's not some kind of political radical, then the fact that he has an insight into black America that no
previous president has, should be a huge selling point for him. This is why I think his association with Wright's church might be considered a rare quality
in a president. But I'm a drunk Canook, so heed my words with caution.
|
|||
SurvivorLDog93 |
|||
|
Yet another summary artricle describing McCain's connections with pro-Putin forces in Russia and the Ukraine, with WaPo cites.
Posted on 2/20/2008 4:10:21 AM by Man50D Sen. John McCain has asserted his opposition to Russian President Vladimir Putin a number of times, going so far as joining with Sen. Joseph Lieberman, D-Conn., in 2005 to introduce legislation calling on President Bush to suspend Russian's membership in the Group of Eight. That opposition, however, is being called into question by links that have been established in various reports between McCain's campaign manager, Rick Davis, and Ukrainian billionaire Oleg Deripaska, who is suspected of having ties to organized Russian crime. Davis even arranged for McCain to meet Deripaska at a time when Davis' lobbying firm was working under contract with Ukrainian political leaders supported by Putin's regime in Moscow. Moreover, Davis' decision to retain his position in his lobbying firm while serving as McCain's 2008 presidential campaign manager raises questions about McCain's sincerity in his self-avowed campaign to eliminate influence peddling from U.S. politics. It was in 2006 when Davis arranged an introduction between McCain and Deripaska, a billionaire Russian aluminum magnate, during an international economic conference in Davos, Switzerland, according to a report published this January in the Washington Post. Davis, at the time of the meeting, was president of the George Soros-funded Reform Institute and managing partner in his Washington, D.C., lobbying firm, Davis, Manafort & Freeman. Deripaska, whose net worth is estimated to exceed $13 billion, is widely reported to be a close ally of Putin. At the time of the meeting, Paul Manafort, Davis' partner in the lobbying firm bearing their names, had a contract to advise Ukrainian politician and former prime minister Victor Yanukovych, the Putin-supported leader of the Party of Regions who in 2006 was then vying with Victor Yushchenko in the parliamentary elections in a bid to form a pro-Moscow government. |
|||
Pahrump Mania |
|||
nardinim wrote:THE WEATHER UNDERGROUND WAS A DOMESTIC TERROR GROUP THAT KILLED COPS. Do you understand? Do you care? Nine kids grew up without a father. Maybe Obama's ties to Ayers aren't that strong. But why did Bill Clinton pardon two of them, and why does Richard Daley work with Bill Ayers and his wife? I'm sure if they had used the n word 25 years ago that no Democrat leader would go near them. But kill a couple of cops and a security guard? that's forgivable. |
|||
Strange Flute |
|||
|
I don't know any Pahrump Mania. Please never associate me with him. I've never met him, never taken donations from him. He's a stranger to me.
|
|||
Trixie Delight |
|||
|
Not to mention Ayers still defends his radical stance today and shows absolutely zero remorse.
|
|||
Strange Flute |
|||
|
G Gordon Liddy is also unrepentant and crazy as ever. Yet John McCain calls him a friend and supporter.
Last Edited By: Strange Flute
10/07/08 3:44 AM.
Edited 1 times.
|
|||
Trixie Delight |
|||
|
When G Gordon Liddy kills someone let me know.
|
|||
Strange Flute |
|||
|
When Bill Ayers kills someone let me know.
|
|||
wrsrules |
|||
|
It is so scarey people won't look at the facts and are just so hell bent on defending their own candidate no matter what.
|
|||
wrsrules |
|||
|
StrangeFlute in answer to regretting voting for Bush twice, no I don't. The war is a mess but I feel W has kept us safe since 911 almost 8 yrs, no homeland
attacks. Considering the other choices then, Kerry.....and his horrid wife theresa (PS thanks theresa for helping you husband lose) and Al Gore, no I def
don't regret voting for Bush twice.
You know I saw some dem chic on tv yesterday who saw nothing wrong with registering homeless people and arranging to drive them to vote in exchange for food and $$$, the chic could not figure out why this is wrong????? Yes you can drive people to vote but doing so in exchange for them voting for your candidate and giving them $$$ for it???? SCAREY! |
|||
Strange Flute |
|||
|
I'm sure normal voters would never fall for a trick like that *tax cut*. Educated voters only vote for qualified, intelligent candidates *bush tax cut*.
|
|||
AllMenAreIslands |
|||
TheresNoPlaceLike 127 0 0 1 wrote:No. It is not comparable. A company that is so successful that it achieves a "near monopoly," got there not by coercion, but by offering a product that everyone wanted. You have a choice: you can not buy that product and you can develop your own product and offer it. The market is still open to others. In fact, how about recalling that when Microsoft was huge, with its PC programs, there was another company that came along: Apple Macintosh, which as we know also became a huge company. They didn't need coercion, just a free marketplace that was open to anyone to join. It is true it can be difficult, but it is not impossible, to break into a well-established market. AT&T is also finding its monopolies legitimately attacked by cell phone companies. The answer is never to use coercion in the marketplace. When government does it, they are essentially penalizing a successful company for simply being successful. It is only government that has been able to achieve a monopoly by legislating it, not because they offered a product superior to all others for all time. |
|||
AllMenAreIslands |
|||
Strange Flute wrote:SF, now you're really being an idiot, not to mention missing the point!! Government's proper job is to protect rights, which includes patents and copyrights. The only thing you are correct about is: no more bailouts. Business needs government the same way that individuals need government: to protect rights. That's what it is supposed to do. In fact, government is so busy trying to run businesses according to the whim & wish of the moment, that it is the biggest abrogator of rights. |
|||
springfeverish |
|||
|
McCain's nasty, desperate tactics are really boomeranging . Backacha!
McCain linked to private group in Iran-Contra caseWASHINGTON (AP) - GOP presidential nominee John McCain has past connections to a private group that supplied aid to guerrillas seeking to overthrow the leftist government of Nicaragua in the Iran-Contra affair. McCain's ties are facing renewed scrutiny after his campaign criticized Barack Obama for his link to a former radical who engaged in violent acts 40 years ago. The U.S. Council for World Freedom was part of an international organization linked to former Nazi collaborators and ultra-right-wing death squads in Central America. The group was dedicated to stamping out communism around the globe. The council's founder, retired Army Maj. Gen. John Singlaub, said McCain became associated with the organization in the early 1980s as McCain was launching his political career in Arizona. Singlaub said McCain was a supporter but not an active member in the group. "McCain was a new guy on the block learning the ropes," Singlaub told The Associated Press in an interview. "I think I met him in the Washington area when he was just a new congressman. We had McCain on the board to make him feel like he wasn't left out. It looks good to have names on a letterhead who are well-known and appreciated. "I don't recall talking to McCain at all on the work of the group," Singlaub said. The renewed attention over McCain's association with Singlaub's group comes as McCain's campaign steps up criticism of Obama's dealings with William Ayers, a college professor who co-founded the Weather Underground and years later worked on education reform in Chicago alongside Obama. Ayers held a meet-the-candidate event at his home when Obama first ran for public office in the mid-1990s. Obama was roughly 8 years old when Ayers, now at the University of Illinois at Chicago, was working with the Weather Underground, which took responsibility for bombings that included nonfatal blasts at the Pentagon and U.S. Capitol. McCain's vice presidential nominee, Sarah Palin, has said that Obama "pals around with terrorists." In McCain's case, Singlaub knew McCain's father, a Navy admiral who had sought Singlaub's counsel when McCain, a Navy pilot, became a prisoner of war and spent 5 1/2 years in North Vietnamese hands. "John's father asked me for advice about what he ought to do now that his son had been shot down and captured," Singlaub recalled in one of two recent interviews. "I said, 'As long as you don't give any impression that you care more about him than you care about any of the other prisoners, he won't be treated any differently.'" Covert arms shipments to the rebels called Contras, financed in part by secret arms sales to Iran, became known as the Iran-Contra affair. They proved to be the undoing of Singlaub's council. In 1987, the Internal Revenue Service withdrew the tax-exempt status of Singlaub's group because of its activities on behalf of the Contras. Elected to the House in 1982 and at a time when he was on the board of Singlaub's council, McCain was among Republicans on Capitol Hill expressing support for the Contras, a CIA-organized guerrilla force in Central America. In 1984, Congress cut off CIA funds for the Contras. Months before the cutoff, top Reagan administration officials ramped up a secret White House-directed supply network and put National Security Council aide Oliver North in charge of running it. The goal was to keep the Contras operational until Congress could be persuaded to resume CIA funding. Singlaub's private group became the public cover for the White House operation. Secretly, Singlaub worked with North in an effort to raise millions of dollars from foreign governments. McCain has said previously he resigned from the council in 1984 and asked in 1986 to have his name removed from the group's letterhead. "I didn't know whether (the group's activity) was legal or illegal, but I didn't think I wanted to be associated with them," McCain said in a newspaper interview in 1986. Singlaub does not recall any McCain resignation in 1984 or May 1986. Nor does Joyce Downey, who oversaw the group's day-to-day activities. "That's a surprise to me," Singlaub said. "This is the first time I've ever heard that. There may have been someone in his office communicating with our office." "I don't ever remember hearing about his resigning, but I really wasn't worried about that part of our activities, a housekeeping thing,"
said Singlaub. "If he didn't want to be on the board that's OK. It wasn't as if he had been active participant and we were going to miss his
help. He had no active interest. He certainly supported us."
|
|||
merkyl |
|||
|
Nice to see AP is doing Obama's work for him.
|
|||
AllMenAreIslands |
|||
Goosehead wrote: Monopolies (or in fact near-monopolies) earned by business are the complete opposite of monopolies imposed by government. To prevent them, or attack them once they become evident, is to punish competent businessmen for being competent. Bear in mind: it is us, the people, who make those companies successful. You have a choice: to buy or not. You have another choice: to enter the field of competition with your own product. Only when government steps in, and takes over, do we have true monopolies, in which by LAW nobody else is allowed to compete. Then government is not protecting rights, but abridging them. Smith was wrong on this point if he what he meant was that a "monopoly" earned by successful companies should be attacked. I think he may have been referring to the government's tendency to set up monopolies by legislating them into place and forbidding all others to compete. |
|||
Strange Flute |
|||
AllMenAreIslands wrote:How about the right not to be swindled by cons? Do home-buyers have the right to not be bamboozled into buying an overpriced home? Or conned into buying their home with their current credit? Where was the government protecting their rights? Our rights? |
|||
merkyl |
|||
|
You have every right to be stupid, as you constantly prove, flute.
|
|||