| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
Kirblar |
|||
|
East Coast is fine, everyone else is going to get screwed with.
|
|||
Orangeena |
Charlie's also already giving print & radio interviews | ||
|
Charlie is also per items elsewhere giving print and radio interviews ALREADY. Not a good sign for his winning.
And he's a friend of Eliza's?I love Eliza myself. I especially loved her after seeing how kind and caring she was in the Ponderosa videos to the recent cast-offs as they came trudging in.... |
|||
Kirblar |
|||
|
Charlie had major weight loss. Given his behavior/traits I'd feel safe to just call it attention-whoring.
That and he probably doesn't win. |
|||
Cassidy666 |
|||
craig wrote: That's a nice catch, Craig. I'm hoping something like that happens. Marcus's edit is just too in your face and it would suck if it really ended like that. I LUV TIJUANA wrote: I'm actually contemplating which would be more entertaining. |
|||
birdlady |
|||
|
I'd still like to see more of a Survivor format for the "debates". Not like who can carry more mud in their hair, and definitely not going around
in their underwwear, but like having to work in a group, with people who aren't necessarily your allies, with constrained resources, solving anticipated
problems like food and shelter, but also unexpected ones like challenges.
|
|||
Poopert |
Survivor debate | ||
|
oooh, a survivor format for the debates... i like it.
|
|||
kdeec |
|||
birdlady wrote: Problem is, we're supposed to vote someone in... I'd rather vote people out. |
|||