| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
LaurenTheLush |
|||
|
I thought it didn't come out until December?
|
|||
ObservingEgo |
|||
Penelope McBagpipe wrote: Up at the Villa |
|||
Vegazguy |
|||
|
advanced screening. sorries for the confusion. go watch it.
|
|||
LaurenTheLush |
|||
|
I'm stoked to see it.
|
|||
Vegazguy |
|||
|
it was like watching the events of the past month on the big screen. i also recommend watching the documentary the times of
harvey milk which is available at your local library for free or your local hollywood/blockbuster for a fee. the doc is really good. the vigil at the
end was knot in the throat inducing.
|
|||
RoMa |
|||
|
Do you, also, recommend that vegas, as well?
|
|||
Phuz1 |
|||
|
Where's the love for this movie?
Sean Penn's performance is dead-on (oh, bad choice of words), and the story managed to build dramatic tension despite the fact we know how it ends. It's a remarkable primer for how shitty politicians and police made gay life 30 years ago, and it's shockingly timely, considering Prop 8 and the historic election of a candidate running on a message of inclusiveness and hope. |
|||
nomii |
|||
|
i laughed, i cried, i cried some more.
awesome movie, and yes, eerily relevant. |
|||
angelinab |
|||
|
I loved the movie. I am not a fan of Sean Penn but he was amazing.
James Franco is ridiculously hot. Not one to cry, but the ending had me in @#+@! anyway. |
|||
goner1 |
|||
|
i like the 2%, but i only allow myself the 1%.
|
|||
Zzunk |
|||
|
What? No t.ears for George Moscone?
|
|||
hossc |
|||
|
Fuck that noise. I'm lactose intolerant.
Eastwood in Gran Torino was Clint goodness. |
|||
sadllama |
|||
|
so is this going to be the movie this year that all the gays latch onto and then cry about the homophobic academy when it doesn't win best picture?
|
|||
Casey333 |
|||
|
No, that's Twilight.
|
|||
Nods |
|||
|
Its a good film but its not in my top five and it shouldn't make my top ten. The film is good, or should I say Sean Penn is really good in the film. The
writing, directing, and editing of the film is why I don't consider the film to be the best picture of the year. The film tries to hard to be several
different types of genres, at first you think the film will be a romance and based on James Franco's performance it really should have been. The film then
moves into a political film but rather then go into the politics the film steers away from that and only gives us cursory look at the events of the time.
Finally the film could have been a thriller, there is an underlying darkness to the story of Harvey Milk but once again the film pulls back and doesn't
deliver any real Hitchcockian thrills the failure to capture any of these tones is the fault of Gus Van Sant which considering his history isn't
surprising, the failure to establish a focus of the film is the editors. The other problem I had with the film was the writing, Milk is not a complex
character he is treated almost Messianic we only get glimpses of his faults. Also the actual layout of scenes was very cliched, we get over the top symbolism,
we get the big speeches, we get the gathering of the cast, we get the same political conversations that I've seen over the over again. Perhaps its unfair
to judge a film based on its predecessors such as And the Band Played On, Angels in America, Philadelphia, Capote
Brokeback Mountain and Before Night Falls but those films had a focus.
But with those negative comments the film is still good. Visually it is an appealing, the film captures the period of the 70's very well and the inserts of documentary footage offer a good feel to the film. Emile Hirsch and James Franco are absolutely fantastic in the film. Both allow for their characters to exude complexity and depth in a few scenes which is more then I can say for Deigo Luna whose character needed to be flushed out more to make him more then a parody. James Brolin is always great but we don't get enough into Dan Brown's character to make him feel fully three dimensional. I would give the film a B |
|||
Antithesys |
|||
|
Good flick and prescient to today's civil rights troubles. If there's any justice in this world, pro-Prop 8 people will see it and realize how
ludicrously wrong they are. I can't stand Penn but here's his finest hour and the Oscar should be his.
"The Times of Harvey Milk" is a much better film though. I was a typical juvenile homophobe until I saw it at some point in high school and it perhaps had more of an impact on me than any other movie I've ever seen. It'll probably be very hard to find unless it's reprinted and redistributed based on the new film's success. By the way, Milk didn't seem to be a particularly competent politician. Had he lived he probably would have gone down on some scandal or another in the 80s. |
|||
Firebolt31 |
|||
|
Loved this movie. The news clips from around that time totally make me feel like I was watching a documentary. Sean Penn gave an amazing performance. That part
at the end with him and James Franco on the phone almost made me cry.
|
|||
SardonicallyIrrelevant |
|||
|
If Sean Penn doesn't win an Oscar for this, It'll make my Brokeback rage look like mild bemusement. In fact, I think they should give him two Oscars
because he's just that fucking good. The movie itself is pretty damn fantastic too. I haven't seen the documentary though, but bandwidth willing, that
will be remedied by morning.
|
|||
factoryhurl |
|||
|
sean penn deserves all the accolades. he is excellent and so is the film. great archival footage mixed in.
|
|||
EndofAlice |
|||
Antithesys wrote:The Times of Harvey Milk is available for free on hulu.com. |
|||