New Poll
| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
 birdlady |
|||
|
Posts: 1481 (10/01/08 7:54 AM) Registered user |
Ken is in a good position right now.I wouldn't go so far as "good". He's physically probably next to the bottom (ahead of Susie). Someone like Matty or Crystal, who has physical strength and social connections, I would have said "good". But it is early. (Although, having two episodes in one week sorta messed with our sense of timing. By Thursday's show, they have been out there a week, and somehwat settled in camp routines as well as friendships.) |
||
|
survivor300 |
|||
|
Posts: 2599 (10/01/08 8:04 AM) Registered User |
didn't michelle say she was rooting for Ken to win... so maybe he makes jury.
|
||
|
YemaGrl1988 |
|||
|
Posts: 2027 (10/01/08 8:08 AM) Registered user |
survivor300 wrote:It depends when she said it. After she was voted out or post-game? |
||
|
survivor300 |
|||
|
Posts: 2600 (10/01/08 8:09 AM) Registered User |
does anyone know what SF's next 5 boots are?? I can not find them
|
||
|
Strahlx |
|||
|
Posts: 4277 (10/01/08 8:26 AM) Registered user |
i think it's just a reference to who is listed as "vulnerable"
those five people would be GC, Dan & Ken from Fang and Kelly & Paloma from Kota. |
||
|
Joaqenix |
|||
|
Posts: 2387 (10/01/08 9:16 AM) |
YemaGrl1988 wrote:I'm assuming he/she was talking about her interviews after the show, but she also said she wants Paloma to go far, soooooo... |
||
|
Heliox |
|||
|
Posts: 1063 (10/01/08 12:09 PM) |
Strahlx wrote:That works for me! Susie making jury would be a dream. It looks like Dan and Kelly might be vulnerable from a swap, which also might be protecting my foul-mouthed momma. It is so frustrating and so fantastic not to have any absolute spoilers this season. |
||
|
Ozzmanda Fan234 |
|||
|
Posts: 631 (10/01/08 1:49 PM) |
I know. Last season, we go SO much boot spoilers, way ahead of the premiere.
|
||
|
Coachocd |
|||
|
Posts: 7196 (10/01/08 2:14 PM) MESS member |
missyae wrote: Well, it may not be worth much, but Ace did have the "Jeff Probst hand me a check" quote a la Rich. |
||
|
decisionisfinal |
|||
|
Posts: 224 (10/01/08 2:28 PM) |
Joaqenix wrote:Dangit that means Paloma won't go far because her an Michelle probably became good friends at losers lodge and she was trying to be nice to her. T_T |
||
|
crzypunk2004 |
|||
|
Posts: 3653 (10/01/08 8:30 PM) Registered User |
if the next 5 are really GC/Dan/Paloma/Kelly/Ken and Matty and Susie got to know Kelly then does that mean these people are the next 7 to go ? or Matty and
susie could have gotten to know Kelly because of a tribal swap?
|
||
|
Coachocd |
|||
|
Posts: 7206 (10/02/08 2:17 AM) MESS member |
GC/Dan/Paloma/Kelly/Ken/Matty/Susie as the remaining pre-jurors along with Gillian and Michelle would leave a traditional final 9 with a final 2 and a 7 member
jury.
I hope it is a final 2 with an odd number of jurors (7 or 9). The final 3 weakened the game, IMO a change probably madel because MB had a hissy fit that Terry didn't get into the final 2 after his challenge run. The only pre-jurors from Kota I think are Kelly and Paloma. That leaves 2-3 slots for Fongs on the jury. Crystal, Susie and Randy have the best shots of making the jury. Matty makes sense as a the last boot pre-jury. I'm hoping it is a final 2 with an odd number of jurors. It makes for the strongest, straightforward game.
Last Edited By: Coachocd
10/02/08 2:20 AM.
Edited 1 times.
|
||
|
crzypunk2004 |
|||
|
Posts: 3654 (10/02/08 8:46 AM) Registered User |
since this is all speculation, but let's say crystal and Randy are the last 2 remaining Fang members. Which I would not be surprised to hear, I wonder how
the good and evil thing comes into play?
It can't be broken down into tribes with 2/3 evil vs 7 good people or 7 evil people vs 2/3 good. So I'm thinking that maybe new alliances are formed and we won't have a pagonging with Crystal and randy or Susie, That's if the 5 or 7 are the next to go. so maybe something happens where Sugar/Bob or someone decides that Fang are the good people and deserve a shot and decided to pick them up and go against the onion alliance, who knows lol.
Last Edited By: crzypunk2004
10/02/08 8:48 AM.
Edited 1 times.
|
||
|
MMan9000 |
|||
|
Posts: 58 (10/02/08 10:01 AM) |
This is just speculation, but could this season turn into a repeat of Marquesas? The onion alliance makes the mistake of thinking they are in absolute control,
leaving the "left out" Kota members to side with the remaining Fang members and take the four onion alliance members out?
|
||
|
Heliox |
|||
|
Posts: 1080 (10/02/08 12:29 PM) |
Rotu 4= Kota onions? could definitely be a possibility
|
||
|
Brooke276 |
|||
|
Posts: 332 (10/02/08 1:41 PM) |
Acme's up with Paloma as the boot.....
|
||
|
Heliox |
|||
|
Posts: 1082 (10/02/08 3:01 PM) |
For those of us old enough to remember this song from the 70's...
Una paloma blanca I'm just a bird in the sky Una paloma blanca Over the mountains I fly No one can take my freedom away... Well, it sounds like your tribe might be taking yours dove. |
||
|
CSCin3D |
|||
|
Posts: 9366 (10/02/08 3:04 PM) Registered user |
Paloma
|
||
 Oowatanite |
|||
|
Posts: 5935 (10/02/08 4:32 PM) Registered User |
Coachocd wrote: |
||
|
MMan9000 |
|||
|
Posts: 59 (10/02/08 4:38 PM) |
I'm wondering something, where does it say that Dan/Matty/Susie get to know Kelly? All it mentions is that someone is calling Dan crazy, Susie talkative,
and Matty has "a go". Perhaps all that indicates is that they are on the same tribe after the potential tribal swap.
I'm thinking that if the onion alliance gets overthrown, it will have to happen at the final nine. Other than that, the best that the non-onions could hope for is a 4-4 tie with the slim hope that an onion would change their vote. |
||
