| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
Dr Will Hatch two point oh |
Why wern't the larger cast seasons 42 days long? |
Lead | |
|
As much as I dislike larger casts, those seasons would have benifited from an extra episode. Why not have an extra episode and start 1 week early?
|
|||
Riliss |
|||
|
A: Because no one outside of Survivor Sucks (which can't possibly represent more than .01% of viewers) has the attention span for an additional episode.
Larger casts with the same 39 days also allows them to deal more easily with retard contestants like Kathy. |
|||
DarrahColleenJerri |
|||
|
Because Elisabeth came 4th.
|
|||
LuteinSa |
|||
|
|
|||
Pulau Tiga |
|||
|
Did you watch Australia? That's why they'll never go back to 42 days.
|
|||
craig |
|||
|
He's talking about a schedule where you don't get to F5\F4 until day 39.
However, that would drag out the premerge period of the game ever more. I hate waiting 9+ epsiodes for the merge more than I dislike double boot episodes. Also double boots guarentee a certain parity, forcing both tribes to lose a member. Also if they wanted more episodes they could just decrease the number of days between TCs. No need to pay the cameramen and crew to hang around 3 more days. |
|||