The Purple Parrot wrote:Not to mention it kept a big fat target on Erik's head. Lividmanda knew she wasn't going anywhere, so why not keep the target on Erik, he's a huge threat to everyone at this point in the game, and I'm really hoping that she can whoop his ass in a challenge soon.
Wow to anyone thinking that Amanda was genuinely mad at Erik. As it was previously stated in this thread multiple times already, she was trying to guilt-trip him and make him look bad in front of the jury.
0 Kudo
- Survivor Sucks
- Lions, Tigers, Survivors - Oh My!
- Survivor Spoilers
- MESS Hall Tribal Council
- MESS Hall Archive
- Survivor Speculation
- Survivor 20+
- The Amazing Race
- Big Brother
- Big Brother - PAST SEASONS
- The Apprentice
- American Idol
- American Idol PAST SEASONS
- The Mole
- Lost
- Other Shows That Suck
- Off Topic
- Clubs That Suck. No, Really.
- The Dump
- Monster Island
- Purgatory
- FAQ
- In Memory, 9/11/01
I still don't get....
| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
 solesurvivor01 |
|||
|
Posts: 1463 (05/04/08 8:42 PM) Registered user |
|
||
|
yosimtesam |
|||
|
Posts: 8 (05/04/08 8:50 PM) |
i agree, it was a guilt trip play; but i just wonder if she played it up to much thereby losing erics vote if he gets voted out. Also, amanda started playing
the all honest and innocent card when she said i didnt lie when she pulled out the idle at tribal; but when one thinks about it she did lie at tribial council
when she said she could not find the idle... and she had it then. I just think that amanda has to be careful with how she plays the all innocent and honest
especially at the final tribal council because what she did to eric was not that innocent and she has lied; otherwise, we could have a repeat of china.
|
||
|
kishuu |
|||
|
Posts: 13 (05/05/08 6:36 AM) |
She found it after she told them she couldn't find it.
She knows how to act. if they knew she had it, she'll be blindsided like Ozzy and Jason. |
||
|
GrenadeJumper85 |
|||
|
Posts: 4597 (05/05/08 6:40 AM) |
If she was acting, it wasn't smart because she potentially lost Erik's jury vote. It was like when Parvati called out Eliza at the Tribal Council she
was leaving. It was like throwing salt in the wounds. Unecessary.
|
||
|
Dan Down Under |
|||
|
Posts: 2341 (05/05/08 6:48 AM) Registered user |
Meh whatevs. Methinks it was all for the jury. What I don't get is how the ladies actually let Erik win immunity. If they wanted him out so bad, couldn't they have just aimed for only one person's colour in the challenge?
Last Edited By: Dan Down Under
05/05/08 6:53 AM.
Edited 2 times.
|
||
|
LES2002 |
|||
|
Posts: 888 (05/05/08 10:36 AM) I need a hobby |
"What I don't get is how the ladies actually let Erik win immunity. If they wanted him out so bad, couldn't they have just aimed for only one
person's colour in the challenge?"
I agree whole-heartedly. I was thinking the same thing. The women could have done it on purpose or claimed "by accident". And I know that they would have been allowed to do it because someone just missed someone else's balloon and Jeff commented about it. All they had to do was all take out Cirie's balloons (pardon the pun) since she was not going to be voted for. Then they could decide who to vote for - Erik or Amanda and make it look better to the jury that they were all ganging up on poor Amanda. They just did a reward challenge where people can easily gang up on someone to eliminate them, without the person being able to do something, so why not here. Actually I never did like the reward challenge where this can happen - it doesn't matter if you answer the questions correctly or not, you can be eliminated. |
||
|
ChristopherMars |
|||
|
Posts: 4 (05/05/08 1:11 PM) |
They were still thinking in terms of individual immunity. Given some of the blindsiding that's gone on, it's a natural reaction to cover your own ass
first and then worry about the strategy of who will get voted out. I seriously doubt anyone will be able to talk Natalie into giving up a shot at immunity
since she just watched her closest ally get the boot. She'll be the next one to go after Erik, unless one of the other three want her as a patsy to secure
more jury votes. Of course, there may another HII just to muck things up.
|
||
|
roflcoptor |
|||
|
Posts: 3 (05/05/08 1:39 PM) |
i hope there's no more hiis.
and i think the next to go is definitely natalie. because parvati is definitely not going to vote out amanda and they could get cirie to vote for natalie. |
||
- Survivor Sucks
- Lions, Tigers, Survivors - Oh My!
- Survivor Spoilers
- MESS Hall Tribal Council
- MESS Hall Archive
- Survivor Speculation
- Survivor 20+
- The Amazing Race
- Big Brother
- Big Brother - PAST SEASONS
- The Apprentice
- American Idol
- American Idol PAST SEASONS
- The Mole
- Lost
- Other Shows That Suck
- Off Topic
- Clubs That Suck. No, Really.
- The Dump
- Monster Island
- Purgatory
- FAQ
- In Memory, 9/11/01
