Amanda wasted her immunity idol over a jealous twinge, sending her rival STRAIGHT into the arms of her boyfriend. Yeah, that was brilliant.
| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
WatchMeNext |
Alexis????? Someone please explain... |
Lead | |
|
why voting out the non-threatening-challenge gimp Alexis was smarter than voting out the cat lady? Someone?
Amanda wasted her immunity idol over a jealous twinge, sending her rival STRAIGHT into the arms of her boyfriend. Yeah, that was brilliant. |
|||
CathyTheGreat |
|||
|
Because she'd be harder to beat in the end.
|
|||
WatchMeNext |
|||
|
bah - I reject your answer.
NEXT! |
|||
Madduxdude315 |
|||
|
When Alexis won and got to choose to send someone to Exile, Amanda was like OOOOOHHH PLEASE SEND ME! Why couldn't she have sent taken someone else and sent
Cirie, because Cirie probably wouldn't have looked for it. Amanda even raised her hand and Alexis is like oh yeah you can go.
|
|||
WatchMeNext |
|||
|
I'm sorry Madduxdude - your answer is off-topic and thus I REJECT IT!!
NEXT!! |
|||
Survivor Boy |
|||
|
I agree, it was a bad move for Amanda.
I hate to say it but she SHOULD'VE voted for Cirie. Glad that didn't happen! ;) |
|||
BtvsVamp |
|||
|
Sure Alexis would be harder to beat in the end but just vote her ass out next. The F4 IC is always endurance, she ain't winning shit with that knee and
endurance. And she most likely wouldn't win any other IC unless it was completely mental based. Whereas Natalie is fit mentally and physically.
|
|||
token lunatic |
|||
WatchMeNext wrote: |
|||
Thailandsurvivor |
|||
BtvsVamp wrote: That's why Natalie sat out every pre merge challenge over people like Kathy. |
|||
Die Apokalyptischen Reiter |
|||
BtvsVamp wrote: But Natalie is a) Invisble b) A BITCH Won't win a jury vote. |
|||
JeffsOversizedShirt |
|||
|
Alexis's leg was gimped anyway. They were just putting an old dog out to pasture.
|
|||
AllMenAreIslands |
|||
Madduxdude315 wrote: WTF are you whining about? Getting rid of Alexis was a huge move. She was very popular - most honest or whatever it was. Let her slide into the endgame? No way. From Parvati's point of view it gets rid of someone whom none of them can beat, but also makes Natalie more dependent on her for best buddy. Natalie won't be feeling divided loyalties and maybe siding with Alexis later on and booting Parvati.I do think Natalie is Parvati's best bet to win the game. |
|||
WatchMeNext |
|||
|
I'm surprised she didn't vote out Catlady - clearly that was all Amanda and "I have the immunity idol Parv so I want Alexis gone" BS.
Clearly, Cirie stayed because she was honest with Amanda BEFORE tribal council.
|
|||
AllMenAreIslands |
|||
|
She didn't vote out Catlady because Parvati refused to budge and at worst it would have been a tie. Plus I think Amanda may be loved but she's relying
on Parvati to help her get further. Parvy must have reminded Amanda of her own comment about getting rid of the "motivational speaker." Factor in
that Alexis got the "most truthful honest" person at the RC, and we didn't see Natalie get anything nice. Don't forget poor Alexis' gimpy
leg - "Hey we'd be doing her a favor, Manda!" We saw that Amanda was trying to reduce Parvati's options by targeting Catalie, but game wise
for all of them, it IS better to have dumped Alexis now while they had the power to do so. Waiting til F4 could be risking having one of those sit down and
write on a tablet challenges, at which having a gimpy leg would be irrelevant.
|
|||
Joaqenix |
|||
|
Who cares WHY shes gone, just be grateful that she IS gone. At least Natalie has bizarre jugular-flossing confessionals to keep her interesting.
|
|||
WylDawg |
|||
|
I think they were grossly overestimating Clemexis. Since when is Clemmy a challenge threat? And since when is Alexis likable?? Ending up in the final 3 with
both those bitches is the perfect scenario for everyone else. Thank God for us viewers that it won't happen though.
|
|||
AllMenAreIslands |
|||
WylDawg wrote: You can't rule out the fact of Alexis being articulate and well-spoken.Also who knows when a challenge will suit someone's strengths. There have been unexpected wins throughout the seasons. Think about how sympathetic Alexis would have come across, had she made it to the end game with her hurt leg. She had already picked up some nice nods from the other players at the RC (with that questionnaire). I think that most important of all, Parvati wanted to get rid of Alexis to make Natalie more likely to be 100% loyal. In addition, getting rid of a Favorite at this stage would have left the Fans having a numbers advantage (3-2). This way, the Faves have the upper hand.
Last Edited By: AllMenAreIslands
05/01/08 10:07 PM.
Edited 1 times.
|
|||
WatchMeNext |
|||
AllMenAreIslands wrote: Seriously? Parvati who everyone says she mistakenly believes she's in control of the game? I laugh.
|
|||
BuffyTheThreadSlayer |
|||
|
Parvati no longer needs Natalie to be 100 per cent loyal as long as Cirie votes with her and Amanda.
|
|||
WatchMeNext |
|||
|
yea Parvati needs Natalie to be 100% loyal, because Parvati got chopped out first at that reward challenge.
|
|||
Joaqenix |
|||
|
Eh, if Parmanda are smart they'll go right back to Natalie and send Cirie packing. Natalie is no threat to win in the end, Cirie could be. I definitely
think Parmanda have played more interesting games, but you never know if it'll be a "Bitter Betty" jury or not.
|
|||