| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
Olmec Donald |
|||
|
Y'know, India isn't a small country. Just because the terrorists (who incidentally came from outside India) could reach the busiest city, doesn't
mean they could reach the patch of wilderness in the middle of nowhere that Survivor would film in.
|
|||
YemaGrl1988 |
|||
|
... what the hell happened in India?
|
|||
CSCin3D |
|||
Olmec Donald wrote: Well yeah, but I mean there really wasn't THAT high of a risk that they would have been attacked in Jordan either. It's just that this soon after a terrorist attack it's not good publicity. |
|||
cindidindi76 |
|||
YemaGrl1988 wrote:
Agreed, CSC. |
|||
Olmec Donald |
|||
YemaGrl1988 wrote: Don't you Canucks watch the news? |
|||
Bon Qui Qui baby |
|||
|
anyone see slumdog millionaire? I did this past weekend and it makes me want Survivor: India really bad. Though it's highly unlikely.
|
|||
survivor300 |
|||
|
what about peru?
|
|||
Heliox |
|||
survivor300 wrote:I am heading there in April will scope it out!.. ha, very unlikely after Brazil, and it has a heavy travel advisory for anyone visiting. Which means it would be very expensive to get insurance for them, and potentially dangerous to crew. Thailand has the same advisory, and my friend along with others were very surprised to find their travel insurance is null and void when you travel to a country that has a Canadian travel advisory against it. I wonder if Thailand had such an advisory when Survivor filmed there. |
|||
Olmec Donald |
|||
Heliox wrote: The political trouble in Thailand only started two years ago. Survivor filmed there six years ago, when it was a stable country. |
|||
chitaboy14 |
|||
|
Survivor should go to greenland.
Ok, i know you all are going to prove why they SHOULDNT go there using land mass and forestation percentages but i don't care. This is a site for us haters so go ahead and hate. Im sick of seeing hot tropical islands. Put em in the fuckin ice box and see who actually SURVIVES. |
|||
Bon Qui Qui baby |
|||
chitaboy14 wrote: that is so idiotic and will neva happen. everyone will look the same bundled up in parkas and shit. |
|||
Mypoody2 |
|||
|
I think that Survivor should film in Pearl Islands... it has been 5 seasons, they're pushing it.
|
|||
Casey333 |
|||
|
Well, since they seem to be revisiting the old locales one by one (Africa, South America, etc.), I agree that a return to Australia would be nice.
|
|||
dragoondaniel78 |
|||
|
Posts: 1959 (12/25/08 11:20 PM) Registered User |
They really should host a Survivor in continental Europe soon.
|
||
Edinboro |
|||
|
The final season NEEEEDSSSS to be in Pulau Tiga...<3
|
|||
Remote33 |
|||
|
If they do a season in Europe, I really want a Knights of the Round Table/King Arthur feel to it.
Tribal Council in a castle. Crusade challenges. Moats. The works. |
|||
survivorjordancontestant |
|||
Remote33 wrote: they did one in China, they might as well, although I feel that would be pushing it though, Europe just doesn't scream exotic or harsh |
|||
MidwayHaven |
|||
|
<unnameableposter>
Why not do it in Sinapoor?! It only 1st World country in Southeast Asia. We not smelly like Fipilinos! We have insanely large but defective obversation wheel! Pls Mark Burnatt have Survivor in Sinapoor! <unnameableposter> |
|||
survivorjordancontestant |
|||
|
Survivor in Canada during the summer would be great. Bring in a wild sort of North American feel to the series.
|
|||
Bon Qui Qui baby |
|||
|
^ we dont need a north american feel. we live in north america. they will (god willing) never do it in canada, united states, or europe.
|
|||