| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
Buggles73 |
|||
|
Eh, it just kinda sucks to see someone get played that badly and then get a 2nd chance. Should expect it from this cheeseball show by now anyways though.
|
|||
Ahminept |
|||
WylDawg wrote: So true!! What makes people try to call this the worst twist ever is because it didn't work. I do believe it is true though that Grodner etal likes the James character and created this "guess who" thing at the last moment to TRY to keep him in, and the 2 least brightest people in the house - Adam and Natalie - bought into it. They should have been like Matt - fuck it, I'm down for a change - throw all caution to the wind and pick the mystery guest. I really don't see why Adam and Natalie didn't do the same. Who was a REAL threat to them if they came back? No one. Granted, I not the biggest fan of the mole infested, n*gger-knockin', cock-suckin' mother fucker - but I'm definitely not on the Matt or Ryan train. So fuck it, let the weird little fucker win even. He'll need the money more than most when he see's how isolated he'll be when he gets out and has to start a new life, only having porn friends and such. |
|||
Lovejonze |
|||
|
I feel like this show will never end and the past week was a complete waste of time. I'm getting sick of them all and I want to see someone leave.
|
|||
MJSLawrence |
|||
|
I LOVED the outcome of the twist...what a waste of time for the sequestered players though...especially the ones that were locked up alone somewhere...be
pretty hard to swallow...
But the fact that you guys wanted Alex in makes me so glad it didn't pan out for him...James is the best...he didn't deserve to go out like that and now I'm glad he hasn't... |
|||
Mypoody2 |
|||
|
shouldve had an endurance between returning houseguests including James to return.
|
|||
Zep |
|||
|
I like any endurance challenge. Really shows who wants it the most. Especially on Survivor, but would be nice to see the BB freaks sweat to make it back in.
|
|||
Zep |
|||
|
double post. Sorry.
|
|||
Lovejonze |
|||
Mypoody2 wrote: I agree. All this did was drag on an already established line in the sand. Love your icon - is that Chelsia? |
|||
GodHatesAllOfUs |
|||
Eating With Kim wrote: This just makes me think that if it was anyone BUT James then there would have been no stupid mystery box and Alex would walked straight in.
|
|||
mikenpalms |
|||
GLee2112 wrote: Well, in all fairness, what happened to James is the same thing that happened to Ryan. Ryan was evicted and then went to becoming HoH, which fucked James. And now James won HoH and Ryan is fucked. It all evens out. |
|||
roxbury123 |
|||
|
I think this twist was GREAT!! and here is why. All week i thought it was BS James was going to not get his jury spot and this gave him a way to still get it.
Every other time they brought a player back either everyone was on the jury or it was still the prejury stage. Utopian- Even if they did that James still would
have come back. Ryan would have voted Jen, and all Adam, Chelsea, Josh, Sharon would have still voted for James. Sheila/Nat/Matt's votes would not have
mattered cause i dont think they would have voted Jen.
|
|||
denise4925 |
|||
roxbury123 wrote: Jen? Alex was AC. It was a horrible twist. They should have told the HG's who AC was and then let them vote. I can see giving James a chance to come back because it would have been unfair that he missed the AC twist, but to make it a mystery and one they know smells of manipulation. It was definitely a waste of Ryan's HOH and I'm not getting Nat and Adam's vote at all. Especially Adam. |
|||
StarRider |
|||
|
Face it, the original couples twist ruined the show from the start, but allowing anybody back after being evicted is just plain unfair from a strategic point
of view. It's great for a viewer fan, but really fucks up the players who played their hands in the boot. It's just stupid to do period.
|
|||
gokkun |
|||
|
i'm already loling @ next season's quickly concocted twist that saves the tattooed guy with a wacky adjective before his name
you all should just laugh, too. it's not going to change so long as allison grodner runs this |
|||
Kelegyrl |
|||
|
I think the twist was somewhat different, which made it interesting, but stupid nonetheless. It makes no sense to keep all those people sequestered for nothing. I hear rumors of the writer's strike coming up again so i just think CBS is doing what they can to make the season longer, if need be. They could always cut two or three at a time if they have to end it earlier than suspected. It seems the producers are playing it by ear with what the writer's are going to do. Either way, letting America believe they were taking part in the game, then leaving it up to the houseguests was wrong. But, this is Big Brother and when has shit ever been fair or right? |
|||
SimplyKimberly |
|||
StarRider wrote: I so completely agree. No matter who it is, I think it is wrong to give someone another chance in this game when they couldn't hack it the first time. |
|||
latinkay |
|||
|
i will NOT watch the show this sunday
|
|||
Kelegyrl |
|||
|
And CBS is going to be so upset by this?
|
|||
denise4925 |
|||
StarRider wrote: I totally agree. Ryan, Sheila and Matt were exposed and got fucked. It's different if someone in the house outplays you and fucks you, but if your alliance outplays and fucks another alliance and the producers of the show turns it around on you, it's a violation of the spirit of the game. Let the players play the game and leave the producers out of it. It'd be better if they do away with twists altogether. Let's just have pure gameplay.
Last Edited By: denise4925
03/13/08 3:34 PM.
Edited 1 times.
|
|||
chad6 |
|||
|
This twist sucked. Last week was worthless.
|
|||