| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
seaguy |
|||
|
I am glad they showed him on Extra actually. I got a good look at his face, and if he did not have the tattoos all over them, it looked like he'd be quite
attractive.
|
|||
suckshardcore |
|||
|
Yeah her husband isn't ugly or anything. He's actually kind of hot. It's just those damn tattoos.
If I was a little kid I wouldn't think he was scary though, even with the tattoos. I would think it was kind of cool. He's not ugly or scary looking enough to scare little kids imo. Besides I find that children are do not necessarily judge if they like an adult or not based on how they look. It's weird but just from experience it's like they sense vibes about people rather than looking at them. |
|||
Drew B |
|||
suckshardcore wrote:
We bitch about the judges and the fangirls when they go against what we believe to be true. We congratulate them when they echo our sentiments. Because we are split here over Carly, some feel she was mistreated while others feel that she got the critique she deserved. Ditto with Archtard for that matter. While some feel that he is overpimped to an astonishing degree, others feel that the only reason he gets so much praise is that he never gives terrible performances. He had one trainwreck (in top 12 week), and he DID get lambasted for it... *** and DWTS is a TOTALLY different story. The expectations of the female dancers, simply based on how ballroom dance works, are astronomically higher than for the men. A woman can be every bit as good as a man, but if she's not a whole lot BETTER, she's going to look worse. That's not a matter of who is voting -- that's simply a fact of ballroom... On Idol with singing, there is no inherent gender advantage/disadvantage.
Last Edited By: Drew B
04/28/08 12:18 PM.
Edited 1 times.
|
|||
seaguy |
|||
|
I'd say Archtard was pretty terrible last week. Missed words (AGAIN), weak lower register (couldn't even HEAR him) and pitchy all over the place. The
only one who bothered to say anything remotely negative was Simon.
|
|||
Drew B |
|||
|
I agree he was weak, Sea, but Simon DID say something negative. That's all that matters, as far as I'm concerned. Also, he followed Jason and Brooke.
Even bad, to most people, he looked better by comparison... Paula has such a hard time saying anything negative, and Randy is retarded. We can't take
anything either of them says seriously, anyway...
|
|||
seaguy |
|||
|
Very true, but I was just saying he had more than just one trainwreck of a performance. I'd even put this last week on par with that first trainwreck.
While he forgot words, he actually didn't sound anywhere near as bad as he did this week. I thought he was going to fall to the floor trying to breathe.
|
|||
Drew B |
|||
|
He covered forgetting the words better this week, and his performance this week at least had the SEMBLANCE of originality (as opposed to admitting to trying -
and failing - to do a Stevie Wonder version of a Beatles song)... This week he was not great, but not a train wreck, IMO. Of course, if Jason and (at least in
most other people's opinions) Brooke hadn't been SUCH train wrecks, then Archie being merely bad would have warranted much harsher critique...
|
|||
Screerider |
|||
Drew B wrote:Don't forget whatever split I'm in that feels that she was way overpraised. |
|||
SurvivorFanGP |
|||
|
Despite her never getting unanimous praise for anything except "Come Together" and "Here You Come Again" (if you don't count
Simon's wardrobe bashing
|
|||
Screerider |
|||
|
Yes. She didn't deserve any of the positive criticism's she received, whether part of a unanimous panel or not. Compared to Kelly Clarkson,
"Best Vocalist in the competition", Paula's orgasms, yada yada yada. All bullshit. And even the negative critiques should have been harsher.
Glad America wasn't buying what they were selling.
Last Edited By: Screerider
04/28/08 5:47 PM.
Edited 1 times.
|
|||
Drew B |
|||
SurvivorFanGP wrote:
Those were her two best performances. Her other performances didn't necessarily deserve "unanimous praise". If somebody enjoys her, good for them. To imply , though, that there is something sinister if others (including the judges) did NOT enjoy her weaker performances is just silly! |
|||
Riff |
|||
SurvivorFanGP wrote: Responding to this ancient post because I finally snagged a copy of the album this weekend for the I-paid-way-too-much price of 99 cents. Not because I cared to know what Scarly was up to before she became Randy's bitch, but because it was largely helmed by Gregg Alexander and Danielle Brisebois, whose defunct band's (New Radicals) album most certainly did not suck ass. The main reason it flopped is even simpler than that. There isn't a hit on it. Alexander wrote the first single and Brisebois co-wrote the second, but neither of them are hits. (Alexander's track especially so.) They're both certainly capable of writing hits. New Radicals had a sizeable one with "You Get What You Give." Brisebois was partly responsible for the biggest radio hit of 2006 - Natasha Bedingfield's "Unwritten." Nothing on the album comes close to either of those. It's as if the two of them didn't think any more of Scarly than we do, and just unloaded all their "C" material on her. They would have been better off giving her the failed New Radicals single, "Someday We'll Know." I'm sure she could've done more with it than Mandy Moore did. The filler is no better or worse than the filler you'll find on albums that don't suck ass, but without a grabber, there was nowhere for it to go but directly into the cut-out bins. I must say even without any standout tracks to recommend it, I certainly enjoyed listening to Scarly being Brisebois' bitch much more than I did listening to her screeching and caterwauling on the AI stage. Being realistic here, if Scarly had won this season, and "Ultimate High" was the resulting release, it would have gone platinum, same as all the other Idull winners' albums (with one exception) did. It's on par with those. MCA did bungle promotions, most notably in the fact that "Beautiful You" should have been the lead single and not "Blow Your Mind." "Beautiful You" was the closest thing to a hit on the record, and with a big promotional push behind it, the album certainly would've done better than the laughable 300 copies it sold the first 3 months.
Last Edited By: Riff
04/28/08 8:27 PM.
Edited 1 times.
|
|||
HoboKitty |
|||
|
Very insightful review.
I heard a couple of the songs on youtube and thought they were pretty terrible - a 16-year-old Carly described her album as an edgy pop-rock-motown fusion, but all I heard was a watered-down pop album that would have sold better in the mid to late 90s when people listened to equally sugary Irish pop groups such as The Corrs and B*witched. I couldn't stand the "nananas" in "Beautiful You" nor the "dooby doobies" in the blowjob song - that was just too much. I've read other articles that said "Blow Your Mind" was a terribly risky single to choose - both because of the subject matter and the fact it isn't catchy. Having said that, yeah, her voice sounded much better back then. Watch her here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gb3mhGHoS90 Hopefully she's matured now and will release a much better album. |
|||
Zebra 3 |
|||
suckshardcore wrote: Nice try, carpet muncher. |
|||
seaguy |
|||
Zebra 3 wrote: Wow, Zebra comes through with a carpet muncher joke about SHC. That's something new and different. |
|||
eastersundayhate |
|||
|
A four-part Carly Shitstain interview is up on Idolatry (Entertainment Weekly's AI coverage). Michael Slezak clearly has his gay
tongue up her pussy the whole time, but some of Carly's bitterness about a double standard between her and the other contestants/inconsistent judging
definitely shines through here and there.
Highlights: Part 1: Simon's Tough Love. "Randy and Paula were sweet but... " "I wanted to do Jolene, Brooke got to do it" Part 2: A "Superstar" Controversy. "Initially we were told it was a song that inspired you [to be a singer] or from a band that inspired you." Part 3: Defining a Style. "We don't get to see the band that much before the show." "A lot of other people maybe have stuff off of Youtube... and it sounds exactly like what they wanted." Part 4: A Higher Standard. "People in the show would forget their lyrics... but the judges would call them human. But I would sing my song and it wasn't good enough." "Half of the top 24 had a record deal and I was singled out" "The facts and figures were totally untrue." Yawn. Crybaby. |
|||
seaguy |
|||
eastersundayhate wrote:Loved that Idolatry thing. Good for her telling it like it is. <3 |
|||
eastersundayhate |
|||
seaguy wrote: I kinda "get" and agree with some of what she is saying (they do critique inconsistently) but a lot of the interview comes across in jarring contrast to the contestant she portrayed who was so at peace with being voted off. It just comes across as angry and bitter to be complaining about song choice and treatment 5 days after coming in last place. |
|||
HoboKitty |
|||
|
Boohoo. Bitterness if very off-putting. I'm back to hating her. "Initially we were told it was a song that inspired you [to be a singer] or from a band that inspired you."And dude, for somebody who auditioned in season 5, doesn't she know anything about the show?? That's one of the lamest excuses I've ever heard.
Last Edited By: HoboKitty
04/30/08 7:52 AM.
Edited 1 times.
|
|||
Drew B |
|||
|
She would have a point if (and only if) her performances WARRANTED better treatment. There is no scandal when you are told that you suck and you
actually DO SUCK!!! That's the part she's not getting, here.
|
|||