| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
 hagiz1 |
|||
|
Posts: 42 (01/13/08 1:31 AM) |
Mypoody2 wrote: just got the newest TV guide and jeff probst said Tom refused and he said "how could i come better than i already did?"
|
||
|
conorUNH |
|||
|
Posts: 49 (01/13/08 5:10 PM) |
how could he do better than he already did? um, he could win twice....
|
||
|
YemaGrl1988 |
|||
|
Posts: 304 (01/13/08 6:27 PM) Registered user |
conorUNH wrote: But it's very unlikely. When you are someone like Mariano, you can probably do better the second time around than the first.
|
||
|
ILoveCB |
|||
|
Posts: 144 (01/14/08 6:30 AM) Registered User |
YemaGrl1988 wrote: But even he fared poorly in Amazing Race All Stars. Maybe its cause he had Amber there with him.....
|
||
|
troybfreewill |
|||
|
Posts: 35 (01/15/08 8:21 AM) |
i agree i think a tribe of three would be totally awesome, the only problem (if you can call it that) is that i for see that the tribe with the numbers would
be in the most danger as the two other tribes would most likely work together to create a new majority, this is all speculation offcourse and other factors
could and probably would affect who sides with whom, also as i think someone else mentioned there would be alot of switching of alliances so even if the first
vote was for the bigger tribe the rest of the game wouldn't neccesarily go according to that voting line, all in all an awesome idea, and a waste of words
|
||
|
CSCin3D |
|||
|
Posts: 7162 (01/16/08 11:04 AM) Registered user |
I think next season it should just be one tribe the entire game. It would completely change the dynamics, allow for some non-traditional players to make it
farther, and make it near impossible for one group to stay in power the entire game.
|
||
|
XtremeInnovator420 |
|||
|
Posts: 758 (01/16/08 11:20 AM) Registered user |
That would be really insane, I've gotta say. But, I get the weird feeling sticking 20 people at TC would be REALLY crowded.
|
||
|
logse34 |
|||
|
Posts: 16 (01/16/08 2:29 PM) Registered User |
Plus Jeff Probst would have to read all those votes!
|
||
|
ILoveCB |
|||
|
Posts: 146 (01/17/08 7:17 AM) Registered User |
You'd get bored very quickly. It would turn out just like Pirate Master did. The reason why Survivor is more interesting is because of the dynamics when
two or more groups of people are kept away from each other. With one tribe, everyone knows what's happening. Its no fun like that. You wouldn't get
blindsides as much.
|
||
|
agentpf1101 |
|||
|
Posts: 13 (01/17/08 10:07 AM) |
maybe they should switch up tribes every 3 days, that would be insane
|
||
|
Mister Plum |
|||
|
Posts: 333 (01/17/08 10:18 AM) |
agentpf1101 wrote: That would be hard for first timers.
|
||
|
Sole Survivor Genius |
|||
|
Posts: 334 (01/17/08 11:13 AM) Registered User |
Mister Plum wrote: Well they are "Super fans" haha |
||
|
CSCin3D |
|||
|
Posts: 7166 (01/17/08 11:14 AM) Registered user |
ILoveCB wrote: The PM comparison is way off. First of all there were tribes in the game, just picked at random every episode. What I'm proposing is totally individual from the very beginning. The problem with Pirate Master was that it was too structured with the captain shit, and he got to kick off whoever he wanted so it became really predictable. A vast majority of the time the two tribe format will end up in a pagonging, even with pre-merge switches, so why not try something different? |
||
|
Wickershamb |
One tribe | ||
|
Posts: 414 (01/17/08 4:48 PM) Registered user |
I always thought the idea of one tribe was interesting, but before individual immunity they would still have team immunity. Just every challenge they split
into teams(I guess like pirate master, but without all the captain crap), and the losing team goes to TC. The reason I find that interesting, is because
alliances would find it very hard to dominate the game.
|
||
|
burtonsfan |
|||
|
Posts: 99 (01/17/08 9:25 PM) Registered user |
I agree with you, I love this idea
|
||
|
Mister Plum |
|||
|
Posts: 340 (01/17/08 11:46 PM) |
Sole Survivor Genius wrote: First timer watchers I mean. 
|
||
|
Syoma |
|||
|
Posts: 1947 (01/18/08 12:50 AM) Registered User |
Im tired of tribal switches.
|
||
|
ILoveCB |
|||
|
Posts: 147 (01/18/08 9:41 AM) Registered User |
CSCin3D wrote: And if there's a Terry or Ozzy on the show? What happens?
|
||
|
XtremeInnovator420 |
|||
|
Posts: 768 (01/18/08 10:23 AM) Registered user |
Wicker's idea might be good, but I remember someone saying around the "unofficial" merge in Fiji that they should've had the team that won
the challenge all be immune, and instead of sending just the losers to TC, have everyone there. In other words: 10 people, merge, but 5 are immune. At 9, they
could have 3 teams of 3, at 8, 2 of 4...as for 7, 5, and 3...well, individual there I suppose.
|
||
|
Us Kids Know |
|||
|
Posts: 1683 (01/18/08 2:33 PM) Registered user
|
CSCin3D wrote: This is something I've been wanting for a while. Start off like Palau, with everyone together, but keep it that way. If they needed drama, they could do an un-merge halfway through the season, and then have two separate tribes until the final four or something. It would either be awesome or fail horribly, but at least it'd be different. |
||
