S15-18: Amanda (China only), Peih-Gee, Ashley, Courtney, Sherea (to a lesser extent), Eliza, Ami, Cirie, Natalie, Tracy (to a lesser extent), Parvati, Corinne, Crystal, Kelly C, Erinn, Sydney, Candace, Sandy, Taj, Debbie = 21.
wow.
| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
JackSparrowBauer |
|||
|
S11-14: Steph, Cindy, Amy, Danielle, Cirie, Courtney, Misty, Sally, Parvati, Candice, Michelle (to a lesser extent) = 11
S15-18: Amanda (China only), Peih-Gee, Ashley, Courtney, Sherea (to a lesser extent), Eliza, Ami, Cirie, Natalie, Tracy (to a lesser extent), Parvati, Corinne, Crystal, Kelly C, Erinn, Sydney, Candace, Sandy, Taj, Debbie = 21. wow. |
|||
survivorisdabest |
|||
|
omh i forgot amy, candace and sandy
|
|||
JackSparrowBauer |
|||
|
Amy <3 she was a beast, and I mean that in a good way. She was easily one of the toughest women ever on the show. She's a Sox fan, too <3
oh yeah, this an Amanda thread... |
|||
craig |
|||
|
Sure, Amanda played a better social game both times. But it was Parv who pulled Natalexis away from Eliza and created the BWB. Amanda never went head to head
against Eliza the way Parv did at that point.
Eliza might have an edge in challenge ability when you factor in her Puzzle Queen status and New Airai's ownage post-switch. Thought it's practically a toss-up. Facing a jury, Amanda is 0/2. Lawyer girl might just have the strateigic cred and speaking skills to do better. Of the China cast, Eliza is most like PG. Of the Vanuatu cast, Amanda is most like Julie |
|||
JackSparrowBauer |
|||
|
Just because Amanda never went head to head with Eliza and Eliza was better at puzzle challenges doesn't mean Eliza's a better player. Eliza was pretty
much never in a position of power, compared with Amanda, who had a near perfect voting record (21 of 22), and was pretty much always in a position of power.
|
|||
survivorisdabest |
|||
|
I was just gonna say what Jack did then i saw he said it lol
Eliza is unable to get herself into a good position while Amanda is excellent at it which is why Amanda will always beat Eliza in any given season. And when it comes to challenges i think Amanda still might have the edge just cause she is good at everything that isn't a puzzle, from ninja star throwing to intense concentration/endurance challenges. |
|||
craig |
|||
|
Funny, I'd probably gave Amanda a slight edge in gameplay over their two seasons (based on placement etc), but still give Eliza better odds of winning if
they played a 3rd time.
Getting into the weaker alliance is an error that is correctable. Thus, Parv and Candice were not inferior to Becky and Sundra in Cooks merely because Yul outplayed Adam\Jonathan at the merge. Unfortunately, the factors that led Amanda to lose two jury votes are harder to overcome. |
|||
survivorisdabest |
|||
|
But Eliza has NEVER been in a stable position, ever, out of all the tribes she has been on. IMO she got alot of bad luck in micronesia though and you are right
that being in the weaker alliance doesnt always mean you are worse. But still, the CONSTANT instability might suggest that she is just not as great at
positioning herself, perhaps due to a weaker social game. Eliza even said that herself in the micro F10 TC.
Meanwhile, Amanda improved in terms of jury vote between China and micronesia. Her micro FTC performance was much much better than her China one and she went from 1 vote to 3 votes. Also, if Micro had been a F3 Amanda could have likely won. |
|||
kenc333 |
|||
|
Daily Amanda <3
I don't think you can really compare Amanda and Eliza because 9 times out of 10, an Amanda-type player would get further than an Eliza-type player. Yes, Amanda wasn't as great at puzzles as Eliza, but she wasn't terrible at them (see China F4 RC, FvF F4 IC..). As said before, Amanda knew how to get into a secure and powerful alliance and knew how to stay calm under pressure. Her gameplay gave her a near perfect voting record, and zero valid votes against her across 2 seasons. Amanda was never regarded as being weak either, so she was never targetted pre-merge (whereas some of the faves saw Eliza as the weakest favourite.) Sure, Eliza may be a better speaker than Amanda, but without a good social game, some jurors may not vote for her just because they don't like her. |
|||
JackSparrowBauer |
|||
|
Eliza is so awesome <3
but as a player, she's very overrated here. She's a decent player at best. She trumps Amanda in entertainingness any day, though <3 |
|||
kenc333 |
|||
|
Daily Amanda <3
Entertainment value is all a matter of opinion though. =) And that's why we have different favourites, so to me, I enjoy watching Amanda more than Eliza. Amanda doesn't even need to say anything to keep my attention <3 |
|||
kenc333 |
|||
|
Daily Amanda <3
Omgosh, Eliza ranked herself above Amanda in terms of gameplay from initial seasons D= Since she knows better than to step into this thread.. Eliza = dead to me. She said the only players worse were Jonathan and James. D= |
|||
craig |
|||
|
Just be glad Amanda ranked ahead of Jonathan and James. :)
Eliza wanting to take out Parv or Ozzy before Amanda says a lot about their perceived threat status. Same way, Yau-man being targeted before Jonathan is hardly a compliment to Penner.
Last Edited By: craig
06/10/09 8:07 PM.
Edited 1 times.
|
|||
JackSparrowBauer |
|||
|
I'm pretty sure personal bias had something to do with that. |
|||
survivorisdabest |
|||
|
lol @ eliza's seething amanda hate
amanda <3 |
|||
Zesty66 |
|||
|
I know lol. I love Eliza, but jealousy is a disease. Same with fucking Todd, "OMG of course I love Amanda! (btw she sucks at the game she never woulda won
she wanted to make all these bad moves I suck)" Herzog.
|
|||
survivorisdabest |
|||
|
^omfg massive agreeance
|
|||
kenc333 |
|||
|
Daily Amanda <3
I think people tend to dwell on Amanda's FTC performances too much and ignore her game before then, which I must say, was pure brilliance. After 78 consecutive days on Survivor, two endgame breakdowns, and living with Denise, of course Amanda's mind would be rattled by the time FTC rolled around. |
|||
craig |
|||
I think people tend to dwell on Amanda's FTC performances too much and ignore her game before then.That's true of Sucks, but her defenders go too far the other way, as if she was the model of good gameplay. In ranking players, I consider their potential to WIN, not just to go far (Amanda) or make interesting moves (Sugar, Jonathan). Many aspects of Amanda's game that save her from being targeted (low-key, introverted, behind the scenes gameplay) also make her likely to lose to most decent players (Todd, Courtney, Peih Gee.or Parvati, Cirie, Ozzy). I loved Katie and Danielle and Stephen too, but their fate with the jury does reveal flaws in their game. |
|||
maldoror122 |
|||
|
Amanda <3
|
|||