| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
 TimmyTAR |
|||
|
Posts: 454 (07/09/08 11:29 AM) Registered user |
ArtieeLange wrote: Kinda like how you should start respecting the other posters here period and let them voice their opinions and point out how you're wrong? |
||
|
kenc333 |
|||
|
Posts: 2373 (07/09/08 3:20 PM) |
I think I've finally figured this thread out...
It's all just a joke and Artiee is just a random fool who thought up the most cracked up idea to see how long he could get a thread going about it because it's so unimagineably terrible. To beat the system, we just need to ignore him forever, and he'll go away with his awful, awful 'idea' =) |
||
|
GnarlsInCharge |
|||
|
Posts: 1797 (07/09/08 3:50 PM) Registered user |
Artiee is just taking the piss out of people ? And all along i thought he had charts and everything with all his ideas for the show.
|
||
|
Dr Will Hatch two point oh |
|||
|
Posts: 4002 (07/09/08 3:55 PM) Registered user |
The funny thing is, Colorofcoils makes more sense then Artiee does |
||
|
ArtieeLange |
|||
|
Posts: 110 (07/09/08 4:20 PM) |
goose wrote:
The team segment of the game does not find the best players, only the best team. Teams, btw, that are randomly selected, again nothing to do with
"deserves".
The mindless viewer such as yourself isn't aware of this, you aren't aware the team segment was to allow charity cases (the old, the fat, the weak,
the stupid) to skate through, perhaps because you're also one of lifes charity case.
|
||
|
Dr Will Hatch two point oh |
|||
|
Posts: 4008 (07/09/08 4:43 PM) Registered user |
*shakes head* Your a comic genius, the PT Barnum of this site, because I keep coming back to it. Maybe to see you embarress yourself some more. Face it kid,
your arguements are worth shit because you take what people say out of context/ignore valid points when you can't rebut them/insult people mindlessly(even
by the standards of this forum)
|
||
|
TimmyTAR |
|||
|
Posts: 465 (07/09/08 9:30 PM) Registered user |
Dr Will Hatch two point oh wrote: X |
||
|
ArtieeLange |
|||
|
Posts: 111 (07/10/08 1:51 AM) |
Dr Will Hatch two point oh wrote: 
Dr Will Hatch two point oh wrote:
arguements
Dr Will Hatch two point oh wrote:
ignore valid points
You have over 4000 posts but can't find the balls or the brains to list these "valid points" I ignore?
|
||
|
platinumtlc |
|||
|
Posts: 3525 (07/10/08 2:14 AM) Registered User |
Night. |
||
|
SFC |
|||
|
Posts: 401 (07/10/08 2:23 AM) Registered user |
ArtieeLange wrote: Look through the thread, it shouldn't be that hard for you to find. |
||
|
getting real |
|||
|
Posts: 1242 (07/10/08 2:31 AM) Registered User |
Artie, just what is your idea of fun in the real world?
Picking eyeballs off kittens? Stalking Bambi with a howizer? Offering suggestions to gallows operators during executions? |
||
|
ArtieeLange |
|||
|
Posts: 112 (07/10/08 10:11 AM) |
SFC wrote: You mean the one where you said you would be intimidated by Ozzy because of his physical presence? I didn't ignore that, I laughed at you, then I said you must be a crippled midget to think Ozzy looks threatening, and then I asked if you were Eric the Midget. I have no reason to ignore any points, valid ones I debate, pea-brained ones (like yours) I find amusing.
|
||
|
Dr Will Hatch two point oh |
|||
|
Posts: 4017 (07/10/08 11:36 AM) Registered user |
Those who do better in certain aspects will fail in other challenges,and therefore the order of the challenges is pertinent. Therefore, those who are adept
in both will do well, and not those who excel in one specific area.This means certain "weaklings" will advance if a strong guy like Terry fails at
something requiring intellect,because it gives those "weaklings" a better shot at being in the winning tribe. Also, you are claiming that people want
the "strong" to advance,and they are not so that is why ratings are dropping.Under your system,this removal of threats is also a likely scenario, so
ratings would drop anyway over time. Do you have any proof that this is why the ratings are dropping? From what I heard,people left after season 2 when they
realized that the show wasn't purely about "surviving",which requires a strong folk to survive, but it might also include "weaklings"
if they are resourceful and willful enough. Please rubut me,I implore you,but for someone who claims to be intellectually superior,please have patience with my
lack of forethought.
|
||
|
kenc333 |
|||
|
Posts: 2379 (07/10/08 2:50 PM) |
platinumtlc wrote: Whaaaat? Is that a reference to me? |
||
|
ArtieeLange |
|||
|
Posts: 113 (07/10/08 7:49 PM) |
Dr Will Hatch two point oh wrote:
As it is now, dummy.
Next. Dr Will Hatch two point oh wrote: No, it could just be coincidence |
||
|
ArtieeLange |
|||
|
Posts: 114 (07/11/08 11:25 AM) |
doc wrote: Is this why you're so confused?
The losers half are the going to TC, they are all vulnerable. The ones that don't get voted out are the ones who strategize successfully. That means
they deserve to be there. The ones that do get voted out fail. That means they deserve it too.
This merit-based system is always fair and always more entertaining, short term and long term.
|
||
|
Kitty Pryde1 |
|||
|
Posts: 5040 (07/11/08 12:59 PM) |
ArtieeLange wrote: Uh...no. Chet didn't really do a damn thing to strategize in Micronesia, and I doubt he'd do it in your system either. And he wouldn't get voted out because he's not a strategic or physical threat. Your system rewards the lesser players like on All-Stars while punishing the better players that still lose challenges (like Tina, Richard, Rob C., etc.) |
||
|
ArtieeLange |
|||
|
Posts: 115 (07/11/08 3:01 PM) |
Kitty Pryde1 wrote: And he was used to vote out stronger players, which on my system would be impossible, since they would be safe, therefore Chet can only vote out other losers, or get voted out himself. Are you that slow that you can't understand the main difference between the two system is that my teams are earned by the players, and the current ones
are randomly selected by the producers?
|
||
|
TW4Life |
|||
|
Posts: 362 (07/11/08 3:11 PM) |
The difference is that not voting out Chet was dumb in the current system while it would be smart with your system yw.
|
||
|
Kitty Pryde1 |
|||
|
Posts: 5043 (07/11/08 3:22 PM) |
Yeah, exactly my point. The best position to be in the game would be to be the worst of the losers. Because no one would ever vote them out due to them being
incapable of winning immunity or strategizing, and thus we'd have a final 2 or Chet vs. Ozzy, which would be boring as hell.
|
||
