| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
doc |
|||
|
Cirie would be the puppet master in the loser team.
|
|||
Kitty Pryde1 |
|||
|
You know, after careful thinking, I realized that Artiee's system would've made Micronesia even awesomer. I mean, the boring young bitches like
Amanda, Alexis, Mary (and to a lesser extent Parvati and Natalie) would've been booted early. Then the boring alpha males would've been booted just
after the merge. And we could've had a final five of Chet/Tracy/Kathy/Cirie/Whichever Alpha Male was the last one standing, probably Erik again.
|
|||
ArtieeLange |
|||
Kitty Pryde1 wrote: Kitty Pryde1 wrote: 1) There doesn't need to even be a merge 2) Even if there is a merge, the alpha's have a better chance. 3) It would be all alpha's, not "alpha males". Unless you are saying all women are weak and stupid?
|
|||
oh ehm gee |
|||
ArtieeLange wrote: 3 of those bims won challenges with another as a runner up at least twice, as did the hippo in her original season (let's not forget that Chris's
fat ass won Vanuatu). Leif was a challenge whore. All of these people were involved in at least one power play during the season. I'm not seeing weak.
Unappealing, certainly, but that's because their personalities suck and/or they're boring as hell. Again, casting problems.
No. You can't judge the players under the current unfair system. Then how can you say that Chet/Kathy should have been the first two boots? |
|||
phoenixtobootcamp |
|||
I know it was hard for you to not burst out at the seams like the prickly bitch that you are before making your argument. I know you like being right more
than you like being a bitch. Glad it worked.
...he thought he would get to keep his dignity. Apparently not, since the editors treated him like shit and threw him under the bus. I do NOT disagree with you about how Chet left, you egotistic cunt.
|
|||
phoenixtobootcamp |
|||
ArtieeLange wrote: ssts </3 |
|||
Kitty Pryde1 |
|||
ArtieeLange wrote: 1. So once again, you just want to warp the rules so this isn't Survivor anymore. 2. Correction: ONE Alpha has a better chance. 3. I say alpha males because under your system, the alpha females will be less likely to make the merge due to the fact that they're more likely to lose a challenge than an alpha male, and thus they'll be major targets. Using the cast from Micronesia, I would say the merged tribe would probably be Cirie/Tracy/Chet/Kathy (the weaker players) and Erik/Ozzy/Jonathan/Mikey/James/Amanda (No Joel, because he's pretty much a one hit wonder with the strength aspect, so a mental or balance challenge would get him eliminated). Then odds are, Ozzy and James would be targets early on due to their strength, Mikey would be a target due to his strength and personality, and at that point, the weaker players would outnumber the strong, so they could pick who the fifth member of the final 5 would be, probably Amanda. |
|||
Kitty Pryde1 |
|||
phoenixtobootcamp wrote: 1. Chet's a wuss. We know this. However, the editors didn't have to make him look as bad as they did. It's not like he was a bad person in terms of personality. We've seen weak players get positive edits before. Hell, he was friends with two people who got pretty positive edits overall, and one of them ACTUALLY quit. They could have easily made Chet to be this nice guy who just wasn't cut out for Survivor, like they did with Kathy kinda. But instead, they threw him under the bus and basically made him look absolutely pathetic. They didn't do that to Sonja when she fell during the first challenge EVER. They didn't do it to Lydia, who couldn't win a challenge to save her life. They did it to Courtney, but that was because she wasn't a nice person, so things worked out there. But Chet was not a bad person. He never said mean things about people, and he was actually pretty polite. 2. Oh for FUCK'S sake. I was making a point to ARTIEE. Not to you. In the words of Shane: "STOP TAKING THINGS SO PERSONAL!" It's not like I singled out Amanda. In fact, I labelled about half the female cast as being bland and boring, including the girl that BEAT Amanda, Amanda's rival, and what's-her-name with the fake tits. So don't act like that was a pot-shot at you. I HATE Amanda, and I HATE other boring bitches too. I'm fully capable of making a comment regarding her without purposefully trying to offend you. |
|||
phoenixtobootcamp |
|||
Kitty Pryde1 wrote: 1. Chet is not a horrible person and I do not think he came across as a horrible person either. Hell, when he shut Joel up at the reunion and gave Jiffy a
piece of his mind, I was rooting for the little guy. But he SUCKED in the game. Both mentally and physically. There have been plenty of "weaker
challenge" people that were loved because of their strategy and manuvers in the game. Chet didn't have either that is why it feels like an
overreaction when someone says he wasn't edited properly. The only time he did anything memorable was when he was taking too much time to fish the key out
of the ocean EP2, similar instances and so on. I kind of understand what you are saying. But this is not an attack on his personality. This is an attack on
his game (which he didn't have -minding).
|
|||
SonOfAbraxas |
|||
|
Why won't this thread just DIE already?
|
|||
Kitty Pryde1 |
|||
phoenixtobootcamp wrote: 1. But again, we've seen players like Chet before who got nice edits. Hell, JANU quit the game, had no real strategy, and they managed to make her look positive for doing so. Kathy was pretty much the same. It just seemed really disgusting to see Chet get editted the way he did, as a quitter and as an extreme stereotype of gay guys. It IS possible to make a person look pathetic without making them look as bad as Chet did. 2. It was either that or "Stalker". |
|||
TW After Life |
|||
ArtieeLange wrote: |
|||
phoenixtobootcamp |
|||
Kitty Pryde1 wrote: 1. Janu? Who even cares about that fucking bitch? Though she could climb trees, thats one more skill than Chet showed us physically. He was the worst contestant ever and editing had nothing to do with it. If there is anyone to blame for his patheticness, it is Chet himself. yw 2. Yes, because how dare I indirectly pointificate you on a PUBLIC-FLAME BOARD rather than read, research, and follow contestants' every move in post-post-show-interviews. The has beens that never were should've been my priority! duh! And please don't continue to blame me for a picture YOU put on public display. The one YOUR FRIEND linked me to. ktnxbi |
|||
mattg591971 |
|||
ArtieeLange wrote:
|
|||
m0t0 maj1 |
|||
ArtieeLange wrote: I would love to spend some more energy regarding this matter but then I realize Kitty right here is doing the talking for the against side. I dunno -- I
might be coming back for more just to be entertained but I feel not even close to receiving punishment and humiliation....Hmm... I also didn't feel that
you can "destroy" an idea. Thank you for the attention though....=)
And yes, you can say a lot about how my life is circled around those things, or should I contemplate? Hmm, I'm really quite lost.
Sorry, I didn't and I'm not.
Last Edited By: m0t0 maj1
05/31/08 11:27 AM.
Edited 1 times.
|
|||
m0t0 maj1 |
|||
|
Question, in this proposed system, who among the previous players will most likely succeed. Or if we are to create a 2 tribes, who will they be composed
of...then maybe we can simulate.
|
|||
ArtieeLange |
|||
oh ehm gee wrote: Only because they gave up, a universally douchebag move.
But in general your question brings up the point that under the current system, we cannot know who is truly weak and who is strong, since the only time they
are individually tested is after the merge.
|
|||
pinoyako |
|||
|
Duh, Chet did not gave up. It was edited that way but it's not.
|
|||
ArtieeLange |
|||
m0t0 maj1 wrote: The ones who aren't weak, stupid, clumsy, or cowardly. Survivor has been on long enough so that we all know what the varied challenges consist of. If
you can't even win some of them you have no business being on the show.
|
|||
ArtieeLange |
|||
SonOfAbraxas wrote: Fixed |
|||