Yuku free message boards

ArtieeLange wrote:

---

That alliance would not only have to start immediately,

actually no, at any given time any given half of the players on the winning tribe can form an alliance and they'r already up one member. also, even though the winning tribe gets smaller as the game goes on, so does th losing tribe, so the winning tribe alliance need less people to control the vote.

but it would also have to start eating itself once there are 10 players left.

this is the same in the current system, irrelevant!!!!!!!!!!!!

This would be obvious to the players, not only preventing it from forming in the first place, but it would encourage players to flip since the less players trying, the easier it is get into the top half.

ZOMG!!! false assumptions!

and there are plenty of motivations for players to flip in the current system, more irrelevancy!!!!!

Also, the same players on the losing team also results in the same players on the winning team. Post-merge, you end up with two alliances; one well-fed, well-rested, strong as possible, and the other weakened to a state of near-exhaustion If that's the strategy they want, let them try it.

umz, if its the original winning tribe of ten that made the alliance in the first place, and they switch who's on the winning tribe, then when the merge comes its that same original alliance of ten that is there (if merge isnt at ten, correct me)

and if the alliance is formed later in the game, then thats still an alliance that consist of half the total player at that point in the game, so if the alliance is formed pre-merge and continue to be successful in thier strategy and vote non-alliance players out until merge, than they have majority at merge

the only exception to that being if a winning tribe of five when there are eleven people left form an alliance one round before the merge, and thats only if the winning tribe in your system is smaller than the losing tribe when there are an odd number of players (is it?)

but even if that happened, since they were the last winning tribe, THEY would be the well fed tribe

and in all other cases, the alliance has the majority assuming they are succesful pre-merge, and just as it is in the current system, 4 morons malnourished players can vote off 3 rocket-scientists well fed players.

so being well fed does nothing for you if your in the minority. except a possible immunity run, but then that player better hope all the post-merge IC's are endurance

wait, you said the challenges would be varied, scratch that, it doesnt help at all.


Under my system the players can do whatever they want,

you know you need to stop being a hypocrite artiee, because you keep on being irrelevant

and the winner will always be the best, not the luckiest.

i am currently preparing undeniable proof that your system is in fact designed so that it is easier to be lucky, lemurowage coming soon to a 100+ page thread near you soon.

although it would only being adding insult to injury, as i've owned the rest of your points already, with the exception of one loophole ive provided you with myself, but even with that after you try to use il be ready to re-own you again, so I'l be waiting.

ArtieeLange wrote:

---

Fizzmix wrote:

---

People choose to suffer over getting voted out, all the time. Like in challenges where Jeff offers rewards to quit.

Look everyone ^ Fixxmix just proved his own argument invalid by noting that players will do anything for guaranteed immunity, because they know, even if he doesn't, that alliances are never guaranteed.

Guaranteed.