Riliss wrote:
I can't believe it took 2 minutes!
| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
Us Kids Know |
|||
Riliss wrote: I can't believe it took 2 minutes! |
|||
Us Kids Know |
|||
|
The whole concept of "goats" totally depends on the jurors that season though. I mean, hell, Clay was the classic, perfect goat, and he almost won
against Brian. If there was a Brian/Katie F2 that year she probably would've dominated the votes. |
|||
SnarkyMark |
|||
|
Yeah, a goat can win if he/she can get one more goat to F2 with him/her. F3 changes that because there's no chance in hell you can get three goats to F4.
|
|||
speedyforme |
|||
|
Posts: 5564 (11/27/07 7:34 AM) Registered user |
Both times they had the F3 it sucked. CI - too many jurors and too many people who never interacted with the F3, Becky got an invisible edit because she got no votes.
Fiji - Cassandra got ignored and it was obvious Dreamz wasn't gonna win at all and Earl got all votes.
In the end, the F3 rule ended up only have 2 people receive votes one season and 1 person receive votes the next season.
Not to mention the BORING final tribal councils…yuck |
||
MJSLawrence |
|||
|
Yeah, that's the biggest kicker of it all...when a juror is voting on people they've never even met can they really cast a vote they feel good about??
|
|||
Dr Will Hatch two point oh |
|||
|
Posts: 1724 (11/27/07 10:20 AM) Registered user |
Mypoody2 wrote: Yes, S12 was the next evolution in the show, and they didn't need any fucking twists to do it, just good casting |
||
aboutbreakingrules |
|||
Kirblar wrote: Uuuuhhh, Yul won 5-4-0. Earl was the one who scored the sweep. You can bet your bottom dollar there wouldn't have been a sweep had Fiji only been a
Final Two.
|
|||
RavuRules |
|||
|
The producers changed F2 to F3, because players now had a better grasp of the game, and everyone was using the goat strategy. After Thailand, we started
having a series of finale blow-outs, only interrupted by ASS2's close 4-3 vote between Romber:
Amazon = Jenna wins against Matt 5-2 Pearl Islands = Sandra wins against Lill 6-1 Vanuatu = Chris wins against Twila 5-2 Palau = Tom wins against Katie 6-1 Guatemala = Danni wins against Steph 6-1 Panama = Aras wins against Danielle 5-2 The Fiji 9-0-0 blow-out seems more coincidental than players adjusting to the new F3 dynamic. The Fiji players shouldn't have really been expecting F3, since they would've left before CI's F3 was announced (unless they did some sort of deep analysis and figured it out based on the bloated jury). The have/have-not twist helped created automatic goats in basically all of Moto, in that virtually all of the Ravu finalists would be seen as more deserving and more underdog than anyone who outlasted in the game due to the class twist |
|||
Kirblar |
|||
aboutbreakingrules wrote: Fiji would have been 9-0 Earl or 9-0 Cassandra. And your sarcasm detector needs work. |
|||
Quiddity |
|||
The producers changed F2 to F3, because players now had a better grasp of the game, and everyone was using the goat strategy. After Thailand, we started having a series of finale blow-outs, only interrupted by ASS2's close 4-3 vote between Romber: Ravu, essentially what you're saying is that every jury vote that's not decided by a single vote is a blow out. I find that to be a ridiculous statement. I'm not aiming this solely at you, as I've heard many others throw it out there too, but I find it completely ridiculous to label a 5-2 vote as a blow out. A blow out is 6-1, or 7-0.
We could probably say that Cook Island's result was coincidental as well, as we got both Yul and Ozzy in the F3 because BOTH were immune at that TC, something which shouldn't have happened, and won't happen again after they fixed things to expire the idol at F5 the next season. Fiji was coincidental, to a point. The fact remains that the second Earl realized that 3 would be facing the jury instead of 4, he immediately backstabbed his biggest ally Yaoman so he could sit next to two ultra goats. The same exact thing which would have happened had F3 been Earl, Yaoman and one of Cassandra/Dreamz. If Earl or Yaoman won, they would have voted the other person out. Fiji showed that this F3 thing is not going to solve the goat issue. Better/well liked players always get voted out in that final jury member slot because they're great players and the other players fear facing them. Regardless of which technical position that spot is, third or fourth, its almost always going to be a player with a stronger chance to win the vote than the person who got 'dragged' or 'chosen' to face the jury. Now that F3 is known to the contestants, the odds of more goats there infact raises even higher. This "goat" thing is never going away. Just like pagonging, its smart gameplay. Many viewers dislike it, but if the players did the exact opposite thing, many of you would be bashing them to death for making a stupid move. They just can't win I guess. Screwed no matter what decision they make. |
|||
Kitty Pryde1 |
|||
|
Rudy-Would've won
Keith-Would've lost, dumbest move ever Lex-Could've won Kathy-Would've won Jan-Could've won Rob-Would've won Jon-Could've won Jenna-Might've won Scout-Might've won Ian-Could've won Rafe-Could've won Terry-Would've won Sundra-Would've lost Yau-Man-Would've won Only twice has the player voted out before the final jury been a player who had no chance at winning the final vote, and in Sundra's case, the two players who DID have a chance were immune, so SOMEONE with no chance had to go out. Keith is just the dumbest move in the history of Survivor, IMHO. |
|||
Kitty Pryde1 |
|||
|
Most disappointing winner ever, FOC, but Rob was a complete asshole, while Amber was nice, so she won.
|
|||
beatles20147 |
|||
|
When are people going to realize that you can't just list the third placers and say "They would've won"? The only one you can say that about
is Terry because he was final three no matter what based on immunity. But a final three finish that the players know about in advance should theoretically
change strategy for players from mid-pre-merge (since there's one to three rounds less to ensure somebody doesn't make the jury) and definitely
throughout the later stages (F7 on probably).
I've written far too much about why I think the final three is the absolute worst thing to ever happen to this show, and I always promise myself before I get into a rant that I'm not going to but it ends up being a huge missive. So I'm not even going to right now. But yeah, it's the worst thing to ever happen to the show and what sucks is that it'll probably stick around forever because the producers seem to have a huge issue with admitting to making mistakes and fixing them. |
|||
Kitty Pryde1 |
|||
|
My list was actually all the people who got voted off right before the final tribal council, not who would've won if their season had a final 3.
|
|||
RavuRules |
|||
|
To be clear Quiddity, I don't really care for or against F3. I've just accepted it and moved on. I was just stating that was the producers' logic
for implementing the F3 twist, and given the string of decisive victories or blow-outs since Thailand, and perhaps starting as early as Africa or Amazon, I can
understand why they did what they did
Ravu, essentially what you're saying is that every jury vote that's not decided by a single vote is a blow out. I find that to be a ridiculous statement. I'm not aiming this solely at you, as I've heard many others throw it out there too, but I find it completely ridiculous to label a 5-2 vote as a blow out. A blow out is 6-1, or 7-0. I understand what you're saying. "Blow-out" for 5-2 is perhaps to strong of a word. I might say, "Decisive victory". The nature of the voting (1 vote changing being a difference of 2--1 point for and 1 point against) leads to the big difference that 1 vote change can cause. 4-3 is a difference of 1 point, whereas 5-2 is a difference of 3, even though only 1 vote has changed
In terms of CI, that season did not necessarily need Yul and Ozzy for the close vote. If we had a different combination of people, even Sundra and Becky, the vote still might have been close. If we have Candice-Paravti-Sundra for instance, the voting dynamic might very well have been something like 2-3-4. There were no real goats in CI, only circumstantial ones The purpose of the F3 twist was to eliminate the strategy of "goat-taking" which has arguably worked. The problem with Fiji, was that the goats took themselves! They were the overt controllers that strung Earl and Yau-Man along, not the other way around. While Yau did get screwed as a jury threat at F4, the twist isn't meant to protect all the people with high jury chances, but to weaken the incentives to take a goat merely for the sake of increasing one's final jury chances. Whether this can work is largely up in the air still. The class twist created a lot of goats--more than usual: Stacy and Cassandra were like instant ones. Dreamz turned himself into a goat, and even Boo probably had significantly lower jury chances than any Ravu including late members like Edgardo and Alex. So the 9-0-0 circumstance was largely unique in that way China will be the 1st season where the F3 twist was not sprung at the candidates at the last minute, so everybody should be strategizing for that possibility well in advance before F3 hits. I think it is way to early to judge it for or against F3's merit as a twist |
|||
tullfan2 |
|||
|
Although there was a problem with the Final 2 with the winner of the Final IC consistently dragging a goat to the finals, there was an easy way to fix it without resorting to a Final 3. They simply could have the 6 jurors vote out one of the two contestants that did not win the last immunity challenge. If it ends up being a 3-3 tie, they go to a tie breaker. The person voted out joins the jury and the 7 jurors vote for the winner from the 2 remaining. If there are 2 goats out of the 3 (eg. Dreamz and Cassandra) at least the jury gets rid of the less deserving of the 2 that did not win the Final IC. |
|||
027huds |
|||
tullfan2 wrote: I think it'd be better to have a fire making challenge or something like that. Getting the jury to vote out one of the players is effectively the same thing as final 3. The jury is still deciding the fate of three people, although of course there would be one less juror making the desicion. |
|||
PrettyGoodYear1988 |
|||
But yeah, it's the worst thing to ever happen to the show and what sucks is that it'll probably stick around forever because the producers seem to have a huge issue with admitting to making mistakes and fixing them.They admitted that bloated casts of 18, 19, or 20 were bad. I think I remember reading somewhere that 16 castaways will be staying around (except for a second ASS, of course, in which case it doesn't matter how many we have since we know them already). They also fixed the huge Jury of 9 and the fact that pre-merge losers like Rebecca and Lisi got to participate in the Final TC. So maybe they'll fix the Final 3 as well. One can only hope. |
|||
tullfan2 |
|||
027huds wrote: Actually it isn't the same because at the Final 3 TC, the jury cannot vote out the contestant that won the Final 3 IC. Also the Final TC would go back to the original format where the jury can question both finalists which is far superior to that of the last 2 seasons. They admitted that bloated casts of 18, 19, or 20 were bad. I think I remember reading somewhere that 16 castaways will be staying around (except for a second ASS, of course, in which case it doesn't matter how many we have since we know them already). They also fixed the huge Jury of 9 and the fact that pre-merge losers like Rebecca and Lisi got to participate in the Final TCWith Survivor China they actually took a conscious step back and analyzed what wasn't working. Another improvement was ditching the elaborate, lengthy, multi-stage challenges that got progressively more complex starting with Vanuatu through Cook Islands. They finally realized that these types of challenges were dominated by the most athletic contestants like Terry and Ozzy. Survivor was becoming a male dominated game. I'm glad that they went back to simpler challenges where the outcome can be more wide open. Hell, even Courtney won a challenge.
Last Edited By: tullfan2
12/01/07 5:01 PM.
Edited 1 times.
|
|||
Alpha 0Mega X |
|||
|
Doesn't that just mean that the challenges favor females now? The alpha males just are left as big targets without the ability to help save themselves
with their skills
|
|||