| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
Deadpool |
|||
|
Zach sucks
|
|||
Crappysucks |
|||
Deadpool wrote: Fixed that one for ya.
Sucks Biggest Douchbag Winner - 2007
|
|||
ZachBB8 |
|||
Crappysucks wrote:Re Fixed |
|||
lachrymoseC |
|||
blmetsfan wrote: He's an idiot |
|||
Dr Will Hatch two point oh |
|||
|
Posts: 5717 (11/07/08 9:08 AM) Registered user |
lachrymoseC wrote:Once again, he overthought the situation and thought Eric would be the bigger challenge threat.
DWH2.0
|
||
Quiddity |
|||
Dr Will Hatch two point oh wrote: Eric, the guy who won what, one challenge the entire season while Daniele dominated? Once again, he's an IDIOT! :) |
|||
Dr Will Hatch two point oh |
|||
|
Posts: 5756 (11/09/08 9:03 AM) Registered user |
Daniele hadn't won a challenge in weeks, and Eric was in berserker rage. I would of booted Dani, but I can see why he would remove Eric. It was totally
reasonable to assume that he would win f4 veto, all this nonsense about him "wanting" to go to the finals with D and D are just cheapshots.
DWH2.0
|
||
Crappysucks |
|||
ZachBB8 wrote: And fixed yet again...
Sucks Biggest Douchbag Winner - 2007
|
|||
Crappysucks |
|||
Dr Will Hatch two point oh wrote: Do you whisper this simple shit in your sleep? You have more excuses for this useless fuck than a cheating husband has for the lispstick on his cock.
Sucks Biggest Douchbag Winner - 2007
|
|||
Dr Will Hatch two point oh |
|||
|
Posts: 5792 (11/10/08 6:06 PM) Registered user |
I'm just clearing up a misconception, Zach DIDN'T plan to go to the final 3 with the Donatos, he expected to win f4 veto, and much earlier he wanted Dani gone at f7, but she didn't, thanks to rigging. That's all.
DWH2.0
|
||
Quiddity |
|||
Dr Will Hatch two point oh wrote:He wanted Dani gone at F7, but he didn't want her gone at F5 when he singlehandedly could have gotten her evicted. Yeah, that makes a lot of sense. Will you ever just admit that Zach was a fucking idiot, one of the stupidest and most pathetic people to ever play this game, and that, above anything else, is the reason he fucked up so badly at F5? Was it rigged at F7? Yes. But that has no relevance whatsoever regarding what happened at F5. Zach had the opportunity to break up the tighest pair in BB history. Instead he guaranteed that a Donato would win the game. Nuff said. |
|||
DAnn Coulter |
|||
Quiddity wrote:
Crappysucks wrote: You are many things Danniboi, but I don't think you have a black conceited soul...
|
|||
Dr Will Hatch two point oh |
|||
|
Posts: 5793 (11/10/08 7:07 PM) Registered user |
I didn't say it was a good decision, I said that I could understand the logic. The majority of players on Survivor and BB usually have an internal logic.
Whether or not it corralates into a good stratagy is up to a number of factors. The bad players and the deluded ones eith have bad information; over analyse;
miscalculate; or simply have bad luck. Rarely do we have someone who is a legitimate bad player(someone who is perpetually bad in the face of good
information). Zach threw most of the competitions, and was stuck with a bunch of cunts. Of course he's going to look bad.
DWH2.0
|
||
Crappysucks |
|||
Dr Will Hatch two point oh wrote: If you can understand Zach's 'logic' you're more fucked up than I thought.
Sucks Biggest Douchbag Winner - 2007
|
|||
diewinelle |
|||
|
oh my holy god. i cannot BELIEVE this guy is still defending one of the worst BB players of all time. and it's always the exact same shit. 'i
didn't say it was smart...i said i understand it.' or 'if he'd only....blah blah.' followed by 'tell me WHY you don't think zach
was a good player.' and then after being told why in 1000 different ways and given 1000 different reasons, he STILL defends that imbecile.
dr. will hatch, you should go to work for dolphincrash. you and your idol could sit around on top of all those mildewed, dusty, unsold clothes and talk about how smart and successful you both are. you could be 'CEO in charge of dude threads' or something. |
|||
buried out back |
|||
Dr Will Hatch two point oh wrote:And yet, Zach had no such thing. Any decision he made in the game was based on outright stupidity, idiocy and the delusion that he was a master at a game he knew absolutely nothing about. Rarely do we have someone who is a legitimate bad player(someone who is perpetually bad in the face of good information). Thank God that we all got to witness the rarity that was Zach then. He was certainly someone who was a legitimately bad player(someone who is perpetually bad in the fact of good information according to you). Zach knew exactly what the Donato's plans were. Dick and Daniele shared their plans and how they were going to execute them with Zach. He was the one who fucked it up on his own by not taking Daniele out. He could have wrapped up an f2 spot at f5 if he took Daniele out instead of Eric, he had all the information he needed to make that decision. He was too stupid to follow through. He saw, like we saw that Dick and Daniele had a tremendous bond yet he chose to keep them both in the game and hope that Jameka??? could help him. If he was too dumb to keep Daniele in, he could have cut Jameka loose and worked with Eric. Eric would have been a smarter player to help advance his game in the end. He would have come away with F2 for sure if the F3 were Dick, Eric and Zach. That's $50 grand more than the F3 he left with. The reason he didn't make it to the end game is because he was a fucking tool with no intelligence and no sense of how to play the game. He also had absolutely no social game, which is imperative to winning in BB. You say he was stuck with a bunch of cunts, well ALL of them were stuck with a bunch of cunts. . The difference between Zach and the others is that all of the others found a way to work their game around the cuntiness of the other houseguests as well as work around the idiocy that was Zach. Zach was like the retard who got on the wrong bus. He thought the bus would just somehow take him to his final destination but he's too retarded to realize that he might have to transfer a few times to get where he wants to go. |
|||
Crappysucks |
|||
|
^^^ That assessment gets the Crappy Seal of Approval.
Sucks Biggest Douchbag Winner - 2007
|
|||
Dr Will Hatch two point oh |
|||
|
Posts: 5848 (11/13/08 5:27 PM) Registered user |
buried out back wrote: Fair enough. Maybe I am overcompensating because BB8 is one of the few seasons of any reality show that took the step beyond manipulation and into outright rigging. I said all along that it was a mistake, infact my first reaction when he didn't use te veto was, "Zach, you dumb fuck." I do think he is underrated though.I think if I hope against all logic and Zach makes it on an All Stars 2,if there was one, that would be the real test. dr. will hatch, you should go to work for dolphincrash. you and your idol could sit around on top of all those mildewed, dusty, unsold clothes and talk about how smart and successful you both are. you could be 'CEO in charge of dude threads' or something.
DWH2.0
|
||
Quiddity |
|||
|
You 'understood the logic'?!?! WTF?!?!? How in the world can one understand the logic of "I can singlehandedly break up the tightest pair in the
game, eliminate the #1 challenge threat, and increase my likelyhood at getting to F2 with the most despised person in the house, but I'm not going to do
it"?! Zach is the pure definition of 'legitimately bad player'. Lets look at his strategy, shall we?
1) Suck at challenges big time 2) Team up with Mike, who willingly threw his game away for no reason, Kail, who wanted to quit and had no idea how to play, and Nick who cared more about screwing Skeletor than playing the game 3) Once all those horrible players, who Zach willingly teamed up with (it was his decision to team up with the 'cunts' as you call them), he then teams up with the tighest pair in BB history, and actually thought that Dick would pick him over Dani!?!?!?!? As for this rigging crap, let me make this very clear to you for the billionth time. Whether there was rigging or not, it was 100% IRRELEVENT TO ZACH'S GAME. The big 'rigging' that occurred at F9 with Dick and Dustin was something that Zach was fine with, he voted for Dustin, remember? And regardless of how many times you whine about the F7 being rigged to keep Dani in, the simple fact of the matter is that Zach could have singlehandedly gotten her out two rounds later and didn't do it? Whether the game was rigged or not makes no difference in rating Zach's game, because the undisputed FACT is that if Zach uses the veto at F5, a Donato DOES NOT WIN. And enough with your dreams about Zach being on BB All Stars 2. The more likely event that will occur is BB's producers purging him from their archives as if he never existed. Wouldn't that be glorious? A BB8 without Zach! I'd love that! |
|||
Dr Will Hatch two point oh |
|||
|
Posts: 5853 (11/15/08 11:06 AM) Registered user |
See, that's the problem I have with you Quid, you are a revisionist.
He THREW the challenges at the begining, just like Dan did.
DWH2.0
|
||