| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
 Oowatanite |
Re: AllStars | ||
|
Posts: 9477 (07/24/06 10:37 AM) Registered User |
Quote: While Jeff did say "line up in any order", I thought it was interesting that the players lined up by partners in the same order as when they were made partners. In other words, L/R, T/J, S/R, K/A, J/A were partnered up for lunch in that order. Later, for choosing buffs, they lined up in the same partner order - L/R, T/J, S/R, K/A, J/A. Interesting. But I don't think that the buffs were stacked. |
||
|
SwineForkbeard |
Re: AllStars | ||
|
Posts: 2580 (07/24/06 11:06 AM) Registered user
|
I quote from Jerri's ASS chat:
Quote: |
||
|
survivorisdabest |
Re: AllStars | ||
|
Posts: 3899 (07/25/06 3:36 AM) Registered User |
ooooooook i was just wondering.
|
||
|
mfrimley |
Re: AllStars | ||
|
Posts: 1223 (08/15/06 4:56 AM) |
Quote: Quote: Quote: Quote: Quote:I've been lurking alot longer then I've been posting, but I have a question. Why is somebody this rude and this unkind not banned? |
||
|
Pulau Tiga |
Re: AllStars | ||
|
Posts: 5727 (08/15/06 5:11 PM) Registered user |
Quote:Because this is a division of Sucks, and Sucks welcomes such characteristics. Also, it's been stated a million times that the buffs were not stacked, nor would any amount of stacking have affected things anyway. Listen to the commentary on the DVD, read interviews, ask the players yourself; the players mixed the buffs up when they reached in and chose randomly from a wide selection. It was not rigged. |
||
|
SwineForkbeard |
Re: AllStars | ||
|
Posts: 2580 (08/15/06 5:13 PM) Registered user
|
Are you stalking me, whoever-you-are? If so, I have one word for you: proofreader.
Quote:This from somebody who said a few days ago "Romber haters can eat shit and die. Swine is the pits of the earth." Nice to meet you, pot. I'm kettle. |
||
|
ptcruisn56 |
Re: AllStars | ||
|
Posts: 5223 (08/15/06 5:18 PM) Registered user |
Um changing topics a bit in here, but has any of the jurors who were voted off 9th and 8th place ever voted or acted bitter?
If I was voted off over 12 days before my final vote I think I would be over it. |
||
 SurvivorFanGP |
Re: AllStars | ||
|
Posts: 11917 (08/15/06 5:20 PM) Registered user |
^ John C, probably.
|
||
|
beatles20147 |
Re: AllStars | ||
|
Posts: 12586 (08/15/06 5:22 PM) Registered User |
Quote: Just because I like you, I'll forgive you for forgetting about the obvious one, Lex (and to a degree, Kathy, although she didn't really vote bitter). ;) Jerri had a bitter question but didn't vote bitter. Same with Kelly G. John C...I'd say he was pretty bitter against Neleh. Rupert was arguably bitter against Lill, and Coby against Tom. I'd say Jamie too; his vote was more against Steph than for Danni. |
||
|
Pulau Tiga |
Re: AllStars | ||
|
Posts: 5727 (08/15/06 5:23 PM) Registered user |
Quote:Jerri (debatably), Kelly Goldsmith, John Carrol, Rupert, Lex, Kathy, Sarge, Coby (debatably), and Jamie (debatably). Yes, you can make the argument that jurors who were given more time to cool off are generally less bitter. But certain people just don't lose this game well, no matter when they're voted off. |
||
|
beatles20147 |
Re: AllStars | ||
|
Posts: 12586 (08/15/06 5:28 PM) Registered User |
Forgot about Sarge...never understood why he had such a problem with Twila's lie about her son since he wasn't even in the game at that point.
Quote: I think that's all it really comes down to. And then there are the gracious jurors, even those in 3rd or 4th place: Rudy, Keith, Elisabeth, Lex (somewhat), Paschal, Jan, Butch, Rupert, Jenna L., Scout (somewhat), Ian, Lydia, and Cirie. |
||
|
ptcruisn56 |
Re: AllStars | ||
|
Posts: 5223 (08/15/06 5:39 PM) Registered user |
Oh sorry about that of course Lex, Kathy, and John C. The others I wasn't to sure about, should have checked that up.
It just makes little sense to me, at least. I guess when you are in the game it is your life, however you would think someone would have had a few days eating and a shower and I would guess they would get to so some recreational activities and that they would be gone from the game so long that they wouldn't feel so bitter. Especially in all the seasons but All Stars where it isn't as personal. |
||
|
SurvivorFanGP |
Re: AllStars | ||
|
Posts: 11917 (08/15/06 5:41 PM) Registered user |
Ironic that ASS had the most bitter Jury.
I don't blame them. It's $1 million. I would be pretty pissed if I were voted out, especially if it was a backstab. ETA - In the end, if I were sitting on the Jury, i'd still reward it to the person who backstabbed me, if they played better than their F2 partner. |
||
|
growsonwalls |
Re: AllStars | ||
|
Posts: 3473 (08/15/06 5:47 PM) Registered user |
I always like the unexpectedly bitter jurors. For instance, Gregg. I'll never forget the look on Katie's face when Gregg hit her with that whammy. Gregg showed more personality in that minute than he did during the game.
Sarge was also an unexpectedly bitter juror. |
||
|
SenseiKreese |
Re: AllStars | ||
|
Posts: 2886 (08/15/06 5:48 PM) Registered user |
Survivor is a social game. If you want one of the F2 to win more than the other one, that means they played better. There's no such thing as a bitter vote.
|
||
|
SurvivorFanGP |
Re: AllStars | ||
|
Posts: 11917 (08/15/06 5:52 PM) Registered user |
Quote: Being bitter can cloud your judgement. You can be alligned with someone for one minute, and think they're an outstanding player. If they backstab you, the bitter Jury could just vote for the other person out of spite. |
||
|
SenseiKreese |
Re: AllStars | ||
|
Posts: 2886 (08/15/06 5:56 PM) Registered user |
<< Being bitter can cloud your judgement. You can be alligned with someone for one minute, and think they're an outstanding player. If they backstab you, the bitter Jury could just vote for the other person out of spite. >>
No, because as as a juror you have the right to vote however you want. That's the beauty part of being a juror. If your friend backstabs you, and they piss you off to the point where they lost your vote, that is THEIR problem. That makes them a worse player. Social game = the jury want you to win. If the jury doesn't want you to win, it means you fucked up. And that makes you a worse player than the guy sitting next to you. Every Survivor winner has been the correct one. |
||
|
SurvivorFanGP |
Re: AllStars | ||
|
Posts: 11917 (08/15/06 6:08 PM) Registered user |
Good point.
|
||
|
mfrimley |
Re: AllStars | ||
|
Posts: 1223 (08/15/06 6:16 PM) |
No sane person can say that Boston Rob wasn't robbed. He Marianowned the game. He got less then four votes because there weren't enough adults on the jury, not because he's a bad player.
|
||
|
mfrimley |
Re: AllStars | ||
|
Posts: 1223 (08/15/06 6:19 PM) |
Quote:Get over yourself. It's just hard to resist responding to your jerky comments, not satlkning. |
||
