panurge46 wrote:Sandra did not, in any way, cost Christa the game....Christa was the least liked person in the entire game, and there was absolutely no way that the group would vote out Sandra before Christa. The fish was not the reason Christa was booted. Sorry try again.
Sandra was such a great strategist that she would have been voted out first if Drake had lost early. Incredibly worthless.
Sandra was such a great strategist that she couldn't decide which one of Shawn or Fairplay should stay and asked them to plead for their life. Incredibly stupid move.
Sandra was such a great strategist that she never saw the Rupert vote coming. Incredibly blind.
Sandra was such a great strategist that her stupid tantrum cost Christa the game. Throwing the fish could have easily cost Sandra her own survivor life. Another incredibly stupid move.
Sandra was such a great strategist that she kept Burton in the game instead of T when he really had no physical competition left and could have easily run the tables. Incredibly lucky move.
Sandra was such a great strategist that, in frutration, she kicked sand in Lill's face. Incredibly childish move.
Like I said, I see more similarities between Sandra and Yasmin than between Sandra and Cirie or Tina, two real strategists. Like Yasmin, her only two real allies were a hard working, clueless chump (Russell/Rupert) and a weird, awkward woman with a funny nickname (Shambo/Big Bird). Like loud-mouth Yasmin, loud-mouth Sandra could have been voted out early.
Saying Sandra was a great winner is like saying the Earth is flat: You may believe it but it won't make it so.
PS: Fairplay was a provocateur and an attention seeker, not a strategist. His crazy antics in real life and Micronesia proved that.
BTW: I don't remember; was Sandra in on Rupert's offer to Savage? If she was, that is another example of her incredible stupidity.




