MakePaulaCry wrote:I'm saying that your reasons aren't good enough because trying to change the existing arbitrary age to a different arbitrary age is really difficult.
19= kids out of high school. 18= kids still in high school. If you can't read, maybe you should leave, or better yet, kill yourself. Besides, who the fuck are you to say that my reasons and the college presidents' reasons aren't good enough? This is fucking OT, not a scholarly debate in front of house of representatives.
And let's see. MADD lobbies to ban alcohol in 1984 to kids 18-20. Seems like an alcohol ban on them to me.
So all the problems you see with the current drinking age are solved by limiting drinking to people out of high school? Do you think that people in high school shouldn't drink? Don't you realize that many countries allow 15-17 to drink alcohol? Didn't you earlier cite these countries as examples of why we should lower the drinking age? Why use those countries as an example but then say that they are wrong and that drinking age should be 19?
And nice backpedal on MADD trying to ban alcohol.
How old are you anyway?
