Oowatanite wrote:at least the onions had the last laugh. the twist reguardless would of screwed anyone. just circumstance that it was marcus.
PrettyGoodYear1988 wrote:Are you fuckin' stupid ? How did that 3-2 "majority" turn out for Marcus ? Do ya think that Marcus would prefer to keep his 6-4 tribe advantage or maybe just go to the merge directly with his majority alliance ? The Dan vote INSURED that the Onions would not be idolled. Susie could/should have tried to flip at any time. This sucky twist just guaranteed her flip. And Marcus was the lucky Onion to be screwed first, followed by the rest of the Onions.
Agreed. At least the best team won TAR. In Survivor Gabon, the best-positioned players are screwed by a ridiculous twist designed to do nothing but screw the best-positioned players. Survivor has actually become more of a crapshoot than TAR, due to all of the twists and HIIs and crap like that.I know, Marcus, Charlie, and Corinne were totally screwed by a twist that gave their alliance a 3-2 majority on both tribes. It had nothing to do with unnecessarily revealing that Susie was on the bottom rung of the alliance during the Dan boot. Nothing at all.
the tribes could of been 4 kotas, 1 fang and 3 fang, 2 kota/5 kota and 4 fang, 1 kota...etc. it's not designed to screw people over (although it does) it's to switch up the game to make it more refreshing for the viewers. so unless you're an onion fantard, you're saying there shouldn't be any tribal switches before the merge in future seasons? because it's unfair?
if marcus had targetted susie instead of ken (which crystal/kenny may have agreed to) he could would of gotten rid of both a wildcard at merge (susie knew she was the 6th all) and could of made friends with crystal and kenny. he just made the wrong decision.
with susie gone at f10 the onions have majority. the question is when sugar would of played the idol.
