Quiddity wrote:
My favorite blindside: Natalie. The look on Natalie's face was priceless when the votes returned 1-1. That moment made up for the awfulness that was BB9.
X. I liked Natalie, but that was an amazing eviction. :P Dustin's in BB8 was awesome too although it was the climax of the season and it was all downhill big time from there.
Why does it increase the chance to be used?
Because the odds of a person needing it winning it is much higher when its six playing compared to 12-14. :P In BB3 when they introduced it completely random people won it pretty much every week except for the week Marcellas won it, and of course even then he didn't use it :P Ironically enough until this week this season was pretty much BB3 from a veto standpoint; used first week then not again after that, even with it down to 6 people playing each time.
I still don't think it gets played that much more than it was in seasons past.
Only the HOH, the nominees, and 3 people of their choosing play. (Much like in the past ala S5). However, to prevent backdooring, only POV players could be nominated should the POV be used. I think that's the fairest way to go about the POV, and it creates a lot of tension (especially for those 3 chosen HGs, knowing that they could go up on the block)
I don't know, I don't really like that system. If one of the three players not on the won the POV and used it on someone on the block, then there are only two choices for the HOH to pick from. It seems like that would actually limit the power of the HOH. And it gives those not playing in the POV a safety pass, which doesn't seem fair. If you weren't on the block, then why would you even want to play POV? You wouldn't. Playing POV would be a 'sub-nomination'. You get to play, but there is a good chance that you would go up if you didn't win it.
