Mateui wrote:
Well, I believe the reason they went with this only 6 people playing for veto rule was to make the veto be used more. Oftentimes someone not on the block would win it and then not use it because they didn't want to upset the HOH. With only 6 people, the odds are increased that the veto will be used. A veto used = more entertainment for the viewers.
I hate the random ball bag system as it has a potential for rigging (why don't they let the HGs look inside it to verify it's fair... hmm???). My ideal POV player system would be this: Only the HOH, the nominees, and 3 people of their choosing play. (Much like in the past ala S5). However, to prevent backdooring, only POV players could be nominated should the POV be used. I think that's the fairest way to go about the POV, and it creates a lot of tension (especially for those 3 chosen HGs, knowing that they could go up on the block)
Why does it increase the chance to be used?
