Kitty PrydeFrog wrote:
930cab wrote: The players show up and get rid of anybody that has any ability at all. Hey, this lady is a builder and built us a shelter...we better vote her off. Hey, this guy is big and strong and working to hard at camp so we better vote him off. Wow, this guy is smart and is helping us win all the puzzle challenges...we better get rid of him ASAP. Hey, this guy is athletic and helping win most of the challenges...we better vote him off quick. So we end up with a bunch of useless catty women that talk tough but really just sit around and make fun of the people that have any ability at all. If this is what the show is after fine...but please stop holding it on an island and calling it survivor. Hold the show at the mall and call it revenge of the high school clique.
You and Artiee seem to be the only other people here who get the original purpose of the show .
That makes THREE people on here who actually get the game, in this nest of post-whoring morons.
Under the current system, the stronger players will always be voted off by the mobbed-up losers on their team, because the team-portion of the game is
irrelevant. If you lose a team-challenge, you only suffer if you're a good player seen as a threat, since all the losers can simply align and outnumber,
and as 930cab, we end up with weaklings in the finals, what my system is designed to prevent.
