54321blastoff wrote:
I get that Natalie was going to be out so she needed to play Erik but it wasn't even her idea. Why would Parv, Amanda and Cerie do all that scheming just to save Natalie when they were all safe anyway??! I don't get it.
I would think that Parv/Cerie would want Erik to stay to the F4 so that at the F4 immunity challege they can half ass it and hope Erik beats out Amanda so they can vote off Amanda but act like their backs are up against the wall so Amanda doesn't feel betrayed.
Erik was no jury threat anyway...Amanda IS.
Makes no sense.
Now...in order to get rid of Amanda, Cerie/Parv have to screw her over and in that case, Nat might end up getting her vote.
Because with Erik winning the last 3 IC he was more in control of the game then Pav, Cerie and Amanda...Had Nat gone home last night and Erik won immunity
next time he it would have forced Amanda, Parv and Cierie to vote one of themselves off...they were assuring themselves F3.
