I don't know about passive aggressive, but things she's saying aren't adding up. Maybe she got irrational and is trying to make a rational story of it now. I don't have a good explanation, but am really curious, because I think she is a really smart player. I hope someone here will have some insight.

Another example--in her Reality News Online interview, she said:

Ami: You saw me listening to the Fans. I would listen to their plan and the plan sounded intriguing. But it was to vote off Ozzy, I wouldn't go with that. I wasn't for voting off Ozzy. If it had been Amanda, I could have gone with that.

That doesn't make sense to me. Fine, she wasn't voting off Ozzy, but....then...suggest Amanda. I can't imagine that if she'd suggested Amanda, they'd have been all, "No, no, if we can't vote off Ozzy, we'll let it be one of us." And for her the difference between voting of Amanda v. a fan is huge--maybe it wasn't clear at the time which was better, but it would have a major impact on the direction of her game. I would think she wouldn't just leave it to, "Well, if the fans happen to mention Amanda, great, otherwise too bad for them." I'd think, she'd want and take more control than that.

Also, excellent thread title.