Yuku free message boards

HaroldBalzaccio wrote:

---

platoshrimp wrote:

---

HaroldBalzaccio wrote:

---

platoshrimp wrote:

---

Has the government censored its content?

In a manner of speaking, yes they have. Denying FOX access to administration members is a form of information control, which by definition is censorship.

Wrong.
"In a matter of speaking." No need to go beyond this point. Did they censor anything in any Fox News Broadcast or not?

If you believe so, be sure to bring up the firing of Dan Rather and the treatment of Helen Thomas in the Bush regime

Oh, so keeping administration officials away from reporters who may actually ask probing, even embarrassing questions is not a form of information control? Right. Members of other news organizations are calling Gibbs to the carpet over the practice, but that's not good enough for you, oh no.

And again, Dan Rather fucked himself. Your own quote describes his allegations as a "conspiracy theory," yet you're willing to accept it as gospel truth? What's next, an explosive expose by the guy who wrote that CNN piece back in the late 90's stating that we'd used chemical weapons in Cambodia?

You're a nubber ghost, aren't you? Whoever the fuck you are, you're definitely a duller shade of stupid.

HaroldBalzaccio wrote:

---

platoshrimp wrote:

---

Has the government censored its content?

In a manner of speaking, yes they have. Denying FOX access to administration members is a form of information control, which by definition is censorship.

Reporting on the story has been sketchy thus far, with Fox News being the only network to report it so far. In their report, they also fail to make it clear that it was the Treasury Department, not the White House, who was responsible for setting up the interviews.