| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
airshowpilot |
|||
|
How can a person prove that they are gay and that their entitled to such protection under the law?
|
|||
Visa Declined |
|||
airshowpilot wrote: you dont need to be a Gay or a Tranny , the purp just needs to murder you BECAUSE he THINKS you are gay or tranny. However, you are welcome to suck my dick if you want some insurance on this. |
|||
shiza h minelli |
|||
airshowpilot wrote: I believe that question is followed by the sound of a zipper. |
|||
Screerider |
|||
|
Sounds like a plan. Know a dude who's a bigot? Act gay so that he pummels you (come on to him, beg to suck his dick, etc.), and, voila!, he's nailed
for a hate crime.
|
|||
shiza h minelli |
|||
|
I've had a few consensual blo-jays that could have been considered hate crimes... Isn't 'no teeth' a given?
|
|||
BillGuido |
|||
shiza h minelli wrote: You must be watching the same movies I watch. |
|||
shiza h minelli |
|||
|
and if by watching you mean watch for 5 minutes , fast forward, watch for 8 minutes fast forward, then yes... the very same ones!
|
|||
Bonestripper |
|||
How can a person prove that they are gay and that their entitled to such protection under the law?This is not a law for gays so stop getting all proud and uppity. If anyone kills anyone based on sexual orientation they are subject to hate crime penalty's. Obummer did nothing but made gays think he was doing something. |
|||
shiza h minelli |
|||
|
Yay everyone, Bonestripper is here to show us how uninformed he is.
You know, Boner is the perfect example of someone at sucks who just makes stuff up when they don't have an actual legitimate argument to make. Fascinating case study. |
|||
BillGuido |
|||
|
Don't ask too much from Bonestripper, Shiza....or you'll be sorely disappointed.
|
|||
Bonestripper |
|||
|
So you're saying if a gay attacks someone because they are straight that the gay won't be subject to this hate crime legislation?
|
|||
shiza h minelli |
|||
|
Hey boner... you do realize that heterosexuality is considered a sexual orientation as well, right? That this bill
makes it a federal hate crime to assault someone based on sexual orientation, gender and gender identity?
You do get what this means right? So yes... all those incidents of people attacking other people based on them being straight will also be covered. Don't worry pal... when some big burly homo knocks you on your ass you can call it a hate crime too! |
|||
Visa Declined |
|||
|
more likely to be a tranny than a burly homo.
|
|||
shiza h minelli |
|||
|
I was trying to be kind. Hetero privilege has surely made him weak of constitution.
|
|||
unkle greggo |
|||
shiza h minelli wrote: At least you're admitting you want special rights. |
|||
unkle greggo |
|||
Toddomination wrote: Asking for the right isn't melodramatic. Just the idiot poster. And changing a definition to suit your preference then demanding the right isn't equal rights. |
|||
Screerider |
|||
|
I'm glad straight people now have special protection too. It's about time. Symbolic victory!
So it's not really a "gay rights law", as the OP stated. |
|||
leeter |
|||
TobaccoRhoda wrote: You're welcome to it. I agree. |
|||
leeter |
|||
unkle greggo wrote: I love the connotation that 'special' has. How does it harm you if the State recognizes that violence on the basis of sexual orientation is more abhorrent and deserves stronger penalties? Is this is a negative freedom directed towards you? Are you planning some violence on the basis of sexual orientation? Is that why you're so angry? Are you really a gay-basher? |
|||
shiza h minelli |
|||
|
It's the fear of losing hetero privilege that has them scurrying around with their bigotry. They don't seem to want to admit that hetero people having
the right to marry while same-sex couples did not is in itself a special privilege that they are losing.
They grew up with this and take it for granted. It is all based in ignorance. |
|||