| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
SurvivorSurvivorSurvivor |
|||
|
The final three definitely has something to do with Russell's performance in S19...he definitely could be the winner as it's been hinted in the show
that both Eric & Shambo don't like their tribe much...them jumping shift would give Russell a good go at winning the whole thing....either the two
girls want to go to the end with a perceived winner or they figure Russell is so incredibly unlikable that they have a shot (perhaps it's also revealed
that he's an oil tycoon, rendering the money issue void?).....in the case of Sandra/Parvati, they really can only win against other winners, regardless. No
jury is going to be un-jealous enough to reward somebody with a second million when they can give a first million to someone else.
|
|||
speedyforme |
|||
|
Posts: 8072 (10/14/09 3:16 PM) Registered user |
I don't see why Parv/Sandra would believe Russell won his season. No proof but his word unless they are that stupid.
|
||
Jedijake |
|||
|
Parvati and Russell being in the final 3 could very well be the worst case scenario that anyone could come up with.
And cut through the liberal bullcrap about how it's "just your personal choice". That's a load of nonsense! Sometimes things are black and white, night and day, etc and Parvati being in the final 3 again is just plain bad for the franchise. She may be a nice girl for the most part and I'm not saying she isn't, but she is NOT someone we are supposed to root for or want to go far, especially considering she won already. And whatever we may think of Russell now or later, nobody is supposed to ever like him. He may have kittens and rainbows above his head in S20 but he was still slated as the "worst villain ever" (whatever the hell that means). BUT that being said, the worst of the worst truly do need each other to make it to the end and if anyone else in the world trusts these schmos, then that's their own fault. Jerri needs them. I suppose Sandra feels that she needs them although I would be VERY surprised that Parv/Russ would actually drag her along since she did win 6-1 in her season. Maybe she becomes unbearable with her loud mouth. So, the new philosophy in Survivor is to either take the weak-minded or the hated to the end and start doing so from the beginning of the game. How exciting! |
|||
dashbrdparadise |
|||
|
lol @ Amanda being a survivor A-lister
|
|||
tomash |
|||
|
Shame on Parvati and Sandra for trying to win again! They should sacrifice their games to fan faves like Rupert, JT and Amanda instead! And having someone to root against (in Russell) usually makes people more invested in the show. I think casual viewers will appreciate it if former winners actually do well this time around. Most people hated it when the winners left early in the first All Stars. Jedijake wrote: Um, taking people to the end that you think you can beat against the jury is pretty much what this game is about... It's not like it's something new. |
|||
tomash |
|||
|
How is Amanda not an A-lister? She made the final 3 both seasons she was on and the audience voted her in the top 3 most popular each season.
|
|||
Jedijake |
|||
Um, taking people to the end that you think you can beat against the jury is pretty much what this game is about... It's not like it's something new.I know that-just now that there have been multiple seasons with return players, there are pre-conceived notions about who is disliked and who is favored (I supposed the hero vs. villain thing defines that). When it's a new season with new players, those notions are created during the season itself. In other words, Russell would already know that Parvati is not well liked. Parvati doesn't necessarily know how liked Russell is BUT if he's on the villain tribe from the season before, you can probably guess that he's not a likable guy. |
|||
Katy Carney |
|||
|
If it's not someone bitching about randoms dominating the game it's someone bitching about the champions dominating the game
|
|||
SkyDreamer |
|||
|
The only thing that annoys me is that people automatically think that players like JT and Rupert are more "deserving", only because of their past
reputations.
|
|||
tomash |
|||
Jedijake wrote: Parvati is well liked by the other contestants, much more so than a couple of people that look like they are booted early. If you are talking about who the audience likes, I don't think think anyone else than Sugar really cares about that. And if cbs didn't want "villains" to go far, they wouldn't have made up half the cast. |
|||
Jedijake |
|||
I don't think think anyone else than Sugar really cares about that.LOL-I'm sure most of the "heroes" would very much disagree with that. |
|||
SurvivorGuy24 |
|||
|
I love Parvati because even though she looks like a woman, she plays the game like a man. She's the Secret antiperspirant of Survivor contestants.
|
|||
Will |
|||
SurvivorGuy24 wrote:Colby ain't no Hershey bar!! Parslutti does have her ways but I will never rule out the spite vote. Sandra won with the spite vote before, SHE CAN DO IT AGAIN! SI SE PUEDE! Jet Jaga wrote:Normally I'd say "The only challenge Sandra could win would one of the following challenges: 1. Military Trivia 2. Arroz con gandules cook off 3. Spanish Grammar test 4. Quickest person to swear and make the host cry the fastest wins" But Susie did win immunities... maybe Sandra can too. |
|||
tomash |
|||
Jedijake wrote: Then why does it look like the hero-tribe keeps Candice (who was very unpopular with casual fans) over some of the biggest fan faves ever in Cirie, Tom and
Steph? The "heroes" will be playing to win, just like everybody else.
|
|||
Joaqenix |
|||
Jedijake wrote:do you do anything other than bitch about Parvati? why don't you just start posting "blah blah blah Parvati sucks blah blah blah" every time instead of your walls of text? ty! |
|||
Maximus20 |
|||
|
Its funny. Im not fan of Parvarti. I loved her Micronesia game. But I still lose respect for her over the "Flirty" game she
played in Cook islands.
But then again, Id love to see Sandra win. And I agree with people here, that "most likely" Sandra would only win agaisnt 2 other winners. So...if Parv and Russel have to make the end for Sandra to win So be it :P I'll go with the flow. And as long as the season is kick ass, why complain?? |
|||
Katy Carney |
|||
|
fwiw these spoilers don't exactly line up with the premerge info from the other spoilers. Courtney allegedly leaves the night before the merge (which could
still work if they merge at 12 and there's a double boot episode the night before), Rob supposedly makes it as many days as in Marquesas, which would have
him leaving at least seventh.
|
|||
tullfan2 |
|||
Katy Carney wrote: The first 5 voted out and the final 10 are consistent with any and all spoilers that have been posted here. There are some inconsistencies but I received this list before the spoiler was posted that Rupert made Final 6 which I had doubted. There have been some hints (courtesy of Stephenie on Facebook) that were removed that Rob was the last person that was voted out before the jury starts which would mean that he would last somewhat longer (either 8th boot or 10th boot depending when the jury starts). I have not seen any the alleged spoiler about when Courtney leaves so it must have been deleted from here. I've assumed that the merger is at 10 (when JT leaves) because the first TC after the merger is the most likely time when 2 idols would be played. I hope that they don't pull the same crap like they did in Cook Islands and Fiji where the jury starts before the tribes merge. Jurors should spend time with all the finalists. In Cooks, Rebecca had to choose among 3 people that she had not even met which is ridiculous. |
|||
SurvivorGuy24 |
|||
|
Missy said JT is on the jury. Presumably he's the first juror.
|
|||
Jho |
|||
Jedijake wrote: And why? |
|||