Wisspy wrote:
I said the same thing about the engagement lie several pages back....how could this be a good move when the next person goes to sequester, the engagement lie will be exposed so I don't see how this would help her game. So, that leads me to believe she didn't meet with a juror, but instead she was offered more money and the chance to share it, which of course Natalie would never do, so she needed to make up something to explain why she couldn't play for veto. It's amazing how easily/quickly Natalie comes up with bullshit stories - as my dad always says, practice makes perfect.
only I don't think it would've been another money comp - that was already done. all kevin had to give up was time collecting money. I could be wrong but it doesn't make sense to have the same thing done again.
nat's ego is too huge to believe that her lies will ever catch up with her.
















