| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
Dr Will Hatch two point oh |
Does anyone prefer Mole 1 over Mole 2? |
Lead | |
|
I love both seasons, but for different reasons. Mole 2 has a much more lively cast, and Anderson is more fun than he was in the original season, but I think
that season stays truer to the original premise. The Mole is supposed to be mysterious and kind of gloomy with a pseudo James Bond type atmosphere, which the
first season has. Plus the final 3 were generally better detectives/players than Mole 2s. Anyone agree?
|
|||
Riliss |
|||
|
I never saw season 2. Point me in the correct direction.
|
|||
Erinnloveee |
|||
|
Even though I was more connected to the players on Mole 2, I liked season 1 a bit better. It had an organic feel that season 2 lacked. Season 2 had too many
players as well.
|
|||
Dr Will Hatch two point oh |
|||
Riliss wrote: http://www.youtube.com/user/moleclassic You should watch Australian Mole 3 too. |
|||
Cuauhtemoc Gilmore |
|||
|
Season 1 had better missions but season 2 overall was more enjoyable cast-wise.
|
|||
Dr Will Hatch two point oh |
|||
|
Yeah, Darwin complained that the games were dumbed down in his season.
|
|||
brianboyko |
|||
|
I think Season 1 had the best games, Season 2 had the best players, and Season 5 had the best production. (Not just the graphics, but I think they did a good
job of keeping the narrative easy enough to follow without dumbing the games down.)
|
|||
Cuauhtemoc Gilmore |
|||
|
My main complaint is season 5 was less somber mystery and more action in terms of editing. Maybe it's just me though.
|
|||
Dr Will Hatch two point oh |
|||
|
Yeah, The Mole isn't supposed to be an action centric show as much as a mystery. Mole 3(I won't include the celebrity versions) didn't have the
best editing, but it could have been a lot worse. The score isn't even that bad, it's just not as good as the original.
|
|||
Dr Will Hatch two point oh |
|||
|
Young? The winners of the mundane versions were 30 and 24 respectivly. I can why you would think that though. I can imagine the first cast of Survivor being
called "mactorish" today.
|
|||
Cuauhtemoc Gilmore |
|||
|
MARKOWNAGE!!!!
|
|||
grassip.molehypogroup |
|||
|
You have to remember that the first Mole was 8 years ago and the production company that made it has transformed in that time. The producers have a huge hand
in shaping a show to what they think fans want. If you put a guy who worked for Real World in charge of The Mole it's going to look like "Real Mole
World"!
The Mole rocked no matter what season it was!!! |
|||
Cuauhtemoc Gilmore |
|||
|
GhostiePaul! <3 <3 <3
|
|||
Dr Will Hatch two point oh |
|||
|
Love having you two here. This forum won't die if I have anything to say about it.
No Mark, I meant your comment about what people expect out of the game. If viewers really expect an older cast, I don't know what to say, since history doesn't support them. Even the first season of Survivor skewed younger with the exception of three older folk. |
|||
valentine79 |
|||
|
I preferred the tests in season 1, the cast of season 2. Season 5, the missions weren't as intense, but most of the cast was great.
|
|||