| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
SurvivorArctic |
|||
|
Yeah, sorry about that. Eugenics was abolished before her genetic swamp could be purged.
|
|||
gokkun |
|||
|
omg if i find out this bitch is from alberta i will not even be surprised
|
|||
Veelicious |
|||
|
I can handle bitches being bitches, but there's nothing worse than a dumb bitch.
|
|||
RomCen |
|||
|
Sigh...so anyway. Did you guys hear that Michael Jackson is dead?
|
|||
MakePaulaCry |
|||
gokkun wrote: That would surely explain a hell of a lot. |
|||
SurvivorArctic |
|||
|
LIES!!!
|
|||
lilmzcan |
|||
|
Point made--I win---Debbie Rowe should raise her kids.What's good for one culture is good for all.
Should Black children only be adopted by Black parents? yes, they must be taught coping techniques to deal with racist practices The adoption of African-American children by families in the African-American community is important in raising healthy children and crucial to making the community a strong, positive force in this society. My conclusions are based on my professional practice as a Child Protective Services supervisor for 29 years and my position as leader of the National Association of Black Social Workers (NABSW), whose primary focus is the preservation of the African-American family. Related ResultsAfrican-American infants and children being adopted by non-African-American families is not in the best interest of the children because we live in a society where African-American people are ascribed an inferior status based solely on race. This attitude and thought process can be traced back to Africans brought to this country, legislated as three-fifths human, and considered as stock. Though legislation has attempted to erase some of this degradation, laws cannot change the hearts and souls of a people. For African-Americans, this reality is often a vicious, insidious, dehumanizing and degrading form of racism and oppression. African-American children should be reared by African-American families because they must be taught from an early age highly sophisticated coping techniques in order to deal with racist practices. African-American children should not have to live in an environment where their hair texture is likened to a "scouring pad" or where their hair is cut off because the parents don't know how to care for it; or they have an ashy appearance because the parents don't understand the nature of Black skin. Singled out for its position on transracial adoption 36 years ago, a position that has been distorted and misunderstood, NABSW has always maintained the importance of finding culturally grounded options for children of African ancestry before giving consideration to placing our children outside the community. The position was not based on racial hatred or bigotry. It was not an attack on parents of other racial backgrounds or the belief that White families could not love Black children. A former president of the group, the late Dr. Morris F.X. Jeff Jr., once said, "Love is not enough to give a child a sense of belonging, to hold him safe against the experiences of isolation and alienation, of feeling adrift without a sense of anchor in the world. Love is necessary, but it is not sufficient. Children must be equipped, empowered with the arsenal of their cultural traditions and heritage to protect and shield them so that the seeds of love will have a chance to survive and flourish in self-esteem, self-respect, racial identity and self-protection without denial of the gifts of race and color God has so purposefully bestowed upon them." Currently there are more than 500,000 children in foster care in the United States. Of that number, African-American children represent a highly disproportionate number of those and they remain in the system longer than their counterparts from other racial groups. It is good news to know that the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, under the phenomenal leadership of Mrs. Joyce James, is at the forefront of the effort to cope with this disparity. The state analyzed data related to removals of children from homes, reviewed policies and developed plans to remedy disparities. Other states should look at Texas as a model. Since children are best reared in families like themselves, it amazes me that we continue this debate year after year. We know from experience that African-American people are willing to adopt but may not have considered adoption because of real and perceived barriers that they will face at agencies, such as lack of financial assistance and restrictions on single-parent adoptions. All of us have a responsibility to tear down the barriers. In spite of the propaganda, there are many African-American families available to adopt the thousands of African-American children lingering in the foster care system. There are many experts in the field of Black adoption who are willing to consult and/or train foster care/adoption staff on how to break down barriers. And there are Black adoption agencies like Homes for Black Children in Detroit, Roots in Atlanta, Institute for Black Parenting in Los Angeles, Another Choice in North Carolina and others. All families have dreams. The dreams of African-American families are rooted in the past (our heritage); in the present (our communities); and in the future (our children). Gloria Batiste-Roberts is the national president of The National Association of Black Social Workers (NABSW), a retired Child Protective Services supervisor and adjunct professor of social work at Texas Southern University. |
|||
Veelicious |
|||
|
so pathetic. It's sad when people lack complete self awareness.
|
|||
Connie Sewer |
|||
SurvivorArctic wrote: This is why SA is one of my favorite posters. |
|||
lilmzcan |
|||
|
Not my opinion.A black woman thinks children should be raised by their own culture.The Jacksons are black and not blood.Debbie Rowe is blood.
|
|||
lilmzcan |
|||
|
Is this woman a racist-are all the blacks who feel this way racist?She has good crdentials.Get your collective heads out of your asses lololol.
|
|||
MakePaulaCry |
|||
|
LMAO AT LILZCAM thinking we read any of that bullshit. Go fuck yourself.
|
|||
lilmzcan |
|||
|
I'm just so sick of reverse racism.If you can't make valid arguments then don't tell me to STFU.You all are a bunch of ass kissers but I'm
still right. Nitersssssssssssssssssssssssssss
|
|||
Veelicious |
|||
|
She's ignorant and so are you.
Are you ready to admit you stalk me, psycho? |
|||
RomCen |
|||
MakePaulaCry wrote:X |
|||
Hotlantan |
|||
MakePaulaCry wrote:
|
|||
PeachessandCreeams |
|||
Hotlantan wrote: |
|||
superguppie |
|||
|
Hey Lil? One black woman does not speak for every single black person in this country (except for Oprah, of course), and quite frankly her opinion is rather
ill-informed. So please, shut the fuck up. Thanks!
: J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2006;34(3):303-14.
Cultural stereotypes die hard: the case of transracial adoption.Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, 300 George Street, Suite 901, New Haven, CT 06511, USA. Transracial adoption (commonly understood as the adoption of black children by white families) has been the subject of a persistent debate
among adoption specialists, legal advocates, mental health professionals, and even civil rights advocates in this country for a long time. This
has been so despite cumulative research evidence indicating that transracial adoptees can thrive and develop into confident adults with strong senses of
identity and self-esteem. We contend that the evidence undergirding transracial adoption has not been effectively persuasive because of the tenacious
and ubiquitous cultural belief that children and their potential adoptive parents should be matched along racial lines. However, the cultural principle of
racial matching has also been diluted by judicial decisions that have narrowly allowed the use of race as one factor rather than as the controlling factor in
adoption decisions. This article focuses on the use of a third element--federal statutory attempts intended to remove race as a controlling factor in child
placement decisions. We will show how as a matter of public policy, the statutory efforts were meant to promote race-neutral approaches to adoption and to
support transracial adoptions. However, in practice, the statutory attempts may still leave the door open to continued race-matching, which suggests that the
cultural preference for race-matching in the construction of families remains powerfully ingrained and difficult to eradicate. As a consequence, transracial
adoption appears to maintain its status as a culturally suspect phenomenon.
Transracial adoptees: developmental status after 17 years.Chicago Child Care Society, USA. At the fifth phase of a longitudinal study of transracial adoption outcomes, 52 adolescents of black descent adopted in infancy were
examined with respect to racial self-identity, general adjustment, and self-esteem. The 34 adolescents adopted into white families and the 18
adopted into black families identified themselves as black or of mixed race in similar proportions, and most were found to be well adjusted and to have good or
very good self-esteem. The findings offer implications for adoption policy and placement decisions.
Adoptees do not lack self-esteem: a meta-analysis of studies on self-esteem of transracial, international, and domestic adoptees.Leiden University, Centre for Child & Family Studies, Ther Netherlands. juffer@fsw.leidenuniv.nl Do adopted children show lower self-esteem than nonadopted peers, and do transracial adoptees show lower self-esteem than same-race adoptees? Adopted children are hypothesized to be at risk of low self-esteem. They may suffer from the consequences of neglect, abuse, and malnutrition in institutions before adoption. They have to cope with their adoptive status, which often includes difficulties associated with the lack of resemblance to their adoptive parents. Additionally, transracial and international adoptees may feel less integrated into their family, resulting in low self-esteem. In a series of metaanalyses, the authors found, however, no difference in self-esteem between adoptees (N = 10,977) and nonadopted comparisons (N = 33,862) across 88 studies. This was equally true for international, domestic, and transracial adoptees. Across 18 studies including 2,198 adoptees, no differences in self-esteem were found between transracial and same-race adoptees. In contrast, in a small set of 3 studies (N = 300), adoptees showed higher levels of self-esteem than nonadopted, institutionalized children. The authors' findings may be explained by adoptees' resilience to overcome early adversity, supported by the large investment of adoptive families. Adoption can be seen as an effective intervention, leading to normative self-esteem. |
|||
MakePaulaCry |
|||
|
^ugh. sum it up in 2 sentences or less.
|
|||
superguppie |
|||
|
I did. In the first two lines of the post.
|
|||