| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
GoodNeighborgirl |
|||
|
Wait..its something he's doing OUTSIDE of his school, right?
|
|||
BBSpencer |
|||
|
correct.
|
|||
worstdog |
|||
|
Doesn't matter. The devil works all venues.
|
|||
GoodNeighborgirl |
|||
|
Yea, ok , so why do you all think they should not be surprised the rules they agreeded to were about his own school not about his home life. Right?
It's bullshit. |
|||
kooyah |
|||
meatball77 wrote:It's not that he has a problem following the school's rules while at his own school. The issue is that the school is forcing him to follow its rules while he is at a different school. He and his parents likely didn't expect the school to try to enforce its own rules outside of its jurisdiction. That's like a company telling an employee that he can't play video games while working at that company, but then also expecting the employee to not play video games while he's at home or somewhere else.
Last Edited By: kooyah
05/09/09 11:55 AM.
Edited 1 times.
|
|||
Baby Jesus Jr |
|||
|
Video games are the work of the devil.
|
|||
Nonentitled |
|||
|
I wonder if those are the same Baptists that go around in vans giving "pamphlets" to underage kids?
|
|||
Mister Peepers |
|||
kooyah wrote:There are companies that tell their employees that they can't smoke when they are off the clock. |
|||
superguppie |
|||
|
Yesssss, there are many companies that enforce 'good character' type of behavior. Just think of poor Miss California and her nekkid jugs.
But...total agreeance with dmb's post. |
|||
kooyah |
|||
|
I know. That's why I didn't use that example. Those companies are probably also paying health insurance for those employees, which means that off-work
behavior can still cost the company. The same doesn't really apply in the example I gave instead, nor does it apply in the boy's problem with the
school.
|
|||
superguppie |
|||
|
Well, it might apply to the school. If it's private and requires tuition, and their students are running amok, it could ruin the reputation of the school
and decrease enrollment. All I know is--if you send your kid there, STFU about the school's rules. You asked for it, you got it.
|
|||
meatball77 |
|||
superguppie wrote: Agreed There were colleges around where I went to school that didn't allow students to work at jobs where they served alcohol. If you know and agree to the rules when you sign up then you can't complain. |
|||
SonOfAbraxas |
|||
|
I somewhat agree with both sides ... Yeah, you get what you get if you know the school's rules - HOWEVER, if the school with the prom didn't make other
school's kids get a signature from their principal, I'm sure the baptist school would have never known this kid even went to that other school's
prom.
|
|||
unduli clone |
|||
|
I think it's total bull, considering the kid did follow the rules and got a signature! Now this situation is only going to encourage the other kids to NOT
follow the rules since they'll be punished for it.
Me = Christian, but I sure do hate the ones like this. |
|||
Listentothis1 |
|||
|
My highschool had a dumb rule that we had to go to class. On time. Everyday.
Jerks. I should've sued. However, we were allowed to skip class at other schools. |
|||
UrbanSprawl |
|||
|
The kid is a minor. His signature isn't worth much of anything. Minors will sign pretty much anything their parents want them to sign.
The school has no authority over the kid's personal life and personal time. The high school graduate diploma is only valuable in that it has an equivalent value to the graduate diplomas of other high schools, whether in status or as a tool to get admission to a college. To take the value of an object that society has given you and misuse it in this way (as in, not a measure of one's academic achievement but as a means of social control) is to undermine both the value of a high school diploma for all people and the institution of education itself. For example, let's say I'm openning up Charlie High School. There's no classes at Charlie High School. And there's only one rule- Don't have sex. If you follow that rule for four years, you're given your degree. If not, no degree. Substituting academic achievement for an illegal attempt at social control is unconscionable. This school should be sharply censured. And if it wants to continue, it should change accordingly. If not, the state should close down the school immediately. Society has made the high school diploma valuable through its investment in education. It must demand that its value be maintained by sister private institutions. Withholding that high school equivalency over illegitimate grounds should be made illegal. Laws must protect minors who are often underrepresented and made victims in situations like these. |
|||
Pseudo Propaganda |
|||
|
I'm pretty sure if this school feels that Jesus hates dancing he doesn't care if you are on the school grounds or not.
So did the prom come and go? Did the kid get laid? Follow up? |
|||
Zzunk |
|||
|
Can't he just go to the prom and refrain from dancing? Jesus isn't against listening to music and fingering your girl, is he?
|
|||
NickF227 |
|||
Listentothis1 wrote:Learned in Bad Arguments That Don't Apply 101 |
|||
Seyz |
|||
|
That... is pretty messed up.
|
|||